Indirect Analogical Reasoning Components
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29103/mjml.v4i1.2939Keywords:
analogical reasoning, component, indirect analogical problems,Abstract
If using different instruments obtained a different analogical reasoning component. With use people-piece analogies, verbal analogies, and geometric analogies, have analogical reasoning component consists of encoding, inferring, mapping, and application. Meanwhile, with use analogical problems (algebra, source problem and target problem is equal), have analogical reasoning components consist of structuring, mapping, applying, and verifying. The instrument used was analogical problems consisting of two problems where the source problem was symbolic quadratic equation problem and the target problems were trigonometric equation problem and a word problem. This study aims to provide information analogical reasoning process in solving indirect analogical problems. in addition, to identify the analogical reasoning components in solving indirect analogical problems. Using a qualitative design approach, the study was conducted at two schools in Mataram city of Nusa Tenggara Barat, Indonesia. The results of the study provide an overview of analogical reasoning of the students in solving indirect analogical problems and there is a component the representation and mathematical model in solving indirect analogical problems. So the analogical reasoning component in solving indirect analogical problems is the representation and mathematical modeling, structuring, mapping, applying, and verifying. This means that there are additional components of analogical reasoning developed by Ruppert. Analogical reasoning components in problem-solving depend on the analogical problem is given.
References
Amir-Mofidi, S., Amiripour, P., & Bijan-Zadeh, M. H. (2012). Instruction of mathematical concepts through analogical reasoning skills. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 5(6), 2916-2922.
Assmus, D., Forster, F., & Fritzlar, T. (2014). Analogizing during mathematical problem solving-theoretical and empirical considerations. In Proceeding of the Joint Meeting of PME (Vol. 38, pp. 73-80). Retrieved from https://iris.unito.it/retrieve/handle/2318/1620514/285455/PME38-2014%20Vancouver%202.pdf#page=83
Bernardo, A. B. I. (2001). Analogical Problem Construction and Transfer in Mathematical Problem Solving. Educational Psychology, 21(2), 137-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410020043841
Duit, R. (1991). On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. Science Education, 75(6), 649-672.
Eliasmith, C., & Thagard, P. (2001). Integrating structure and meaning: A distributed model of analogical mapping. Cognitive Science, 25(2), 245-286.
English, L. D. (2004). Mathematical and analogical reasoning of young learners. Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=GCqRAgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Mathematical+and+analogical+reasoning+of+young+learners&ots=oXoAt3Ad_U&sig=DVbtiQwggdS6COnnz916j6iqZF4
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 155-170.
Gentner, D., Holyoak, K. J., & Kokinov, B. N. (Eds.). (2001). The analogical mind: perspectives from cognitive science. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Gentner, D., & Loewenstein, J. (2002). Relational language and relational thought. Language, Literacy, and Cognitive Development: The Development and Consequences of Symbolic Communication, 87-120.
Holyoak, K. J., & Hummel, J. E. (2001). Toward an understanding of analogy within a biological symbol system. The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science, 161-195.
Kristayulita, K., Nusantara, T., Asari, A. R., & Sadijah, C. (2018). Identification of Students Errors in Solving Indirect Analogical Problems Based on Analogical Reasoning Components. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1028, p. 012154). IOP Publishing.
Magdas, I. (2015). Analogical Reasoning in Geometry Education. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 8(1), 57-65.
Melis, E., & Veloso, M. (1998). Analogy in problem solving. In Handbook of practical reasoning: Computational and theoretical aspects. Citeseer. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.51.8553
ODonoghue, J. (2004). Finding Novel Analogies. University College Dublin. Retrieved from http://www.cs.nuim.ie/~dod/pubs/05-thesis.pdf
Richland, L. E., Holyoak, K. J., & Stigler, J. W. (2004). Analogy use in eighth-grade mathematics classrooms. Cognition and Instruction, 22(1), 37-60.
Ruppert, M. (2013). Ways of analogical reasoning-thought processes in an example based learning environment. Erscheint in: Proceedings of the CERME, 8. Retrieved from http://cerme8.metu.edu.tr/wgpapers/WG1/WG1_Ruppert.pdf
Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Component processes in analogical reasoning. Psychological Review, 84(4), 353.
Thagard, P. (2005). Mind: introduction to cognitive science (2nd ed). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Whitten, S., & Graesser, A. C. (2003). Comprehension of text in problem solving. The Psychology of Problem Solving, 207-229.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Please find the rights and licenses in Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML)
1. License
The article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2. Authors Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
MJML's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, MJML permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work. Users will also need to attribute authors and MJML on distributing works in the journal.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
- Copyright, and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books,
- The right to self-archive the article,
- the right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
6. Termination
This agreement can be terminated by the author or MJML upon two months notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating partys notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of MJML.
7. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by MJML or its sublicensee.
8. Miscellaneous
MJML will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the articles editorial process is successfully completed and MJML or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. MJML may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers.
