Students' Thinking Process in Solving Mathematical Problems in Build Flat Side Spaces of Material Reviewed from Adversity Quotient

Indra Sari, Marwan Marwan, Hajidin Hajidin

Abstract


Mathematical achievement in problem solving is not yet as expected. This is due to strategies that have not accommodated the situation of students.  Adversity quontient is the state of the student who needs to get the attention of the teacher so that the learning strategy is expected to be appropriate. This research aims to describe the thinking process of MTs Darul Hikmah students in solving mathematical problems in build side spaces of material reviewed from adversity quotient. This research is in the form of qualitative. The subject selection was done by giving questionnaires to class VIII MTsS Darul Hikmah students and obtained by each one person from each adversity quotient group. The subjects in this study amounted to two students. Data collection is done through tests and interviews, while data analysis uses qualitative data analysis techniques, namely data reduction, data display and conclusions from each adversity quotient group. The results showed that no class VIII students entered the quitters group and the results of the study also showed that class VIII students consisted of climpers and campers. The process of thinking of MTsS Darul Hikmah students based on adversity quotient varied: students in the climbers category namely 3 of 53 students had conceptual thinking processes, while students in the campers category were 27 of 53 students did not have conceptual, semiceptual, or computational thinking processes.


Keywords


Adversity quotient Build flat side space Problem solving Thinking process

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agustian, A. G. (2001). Rahasia Sukses Membangun Kecerdasan Emosi dan Spiritual ESQ: Emotional Spiritual Quotient Berdasarkan 6 Rukun Iman dan 5 Rukun Islam. Jakarta: Arga Publishing.

Ahmadi, A. (2003). Psikologi Umum. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Dahrim. (1993). Workshop Matematika. Jakarta: Depdikbud.

Effendi, L. A. (2012). Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Metode Penemuan Terbimbing untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Representasi dan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMP. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 13(2), 1–10.

Herawati, S. (1994). Penelusuran Kemampuan Siswa Sekolah Dasar dalam Memahami Bangun-bangun Geometri. Universitas Negeri Malang.

Hoffer, A. (1981). Geometry is more than proof. Mathematics Teacher, 74(1), 11–18.

Komariah, K. (2011). Penerapan Metode Membelajaran Problem Solving Model Polya untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Memecahkan Masalah Bagi Siswa Kelas IX J di SMPN 3 Cimahi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan Dan Penerapan MIPA, Fakultas MIPA, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 1.

Krulik, S., & Rudnick, J. A. (1995). The New Sourcebook for Teaching Reasoning and Problem Solving in Elementary School. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Lenchner, G. (2005). Creative Problem Solving in School Mathematics. New York: Glenwood Publication Inc.

Masfingatin, T. (2014). Proses Berpikir Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar Berdasarkan Teori Van Hiele. JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika), 3(1), 1–8.

Mayer, R. E., Sims, V., & Tajika, H. (1995). Brief note: A comparison of how textbooks teach mathematical problem solving in Japan and the United States. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 443–460.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (Second Edi). United States of America: Sage Publications.

Moleong, J. L. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revi). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Muldash, M. P. (2011). Pengembangan Modul Matematika Kontekstual Materi Bangun Datar Kelas V SD. Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Nashori. (2007). Adversity Quotient: Hambatan Menjadi Peluang. Jakarta: PT Grasindo.

Polya, G. (1973). How to Solve It : A New Aspect of Mathematical Method. Princeton University Press: Princeton University Press.

Stoltz, G. P. (2007). Adversity Quotient: Mengubah Hambatan Menjadi Peluang (Hermaya, Ed.). Jakarta: PT Grasindo.

Ulya, H. (2015). Hubungan gaya kognitif dengan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa. Jurnal Konseling GUSJIGANG, 1(2), 1–12.

Winarso, W. (2014). Membangun Kemampuan Berfikir Matematika Tingkat Tinggi Melalui Pendekatan Induktif, Deduktif dan Induktif-Deduktif dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Eduma: Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 3(2), 95–118.

Zevenbergen, R., Dole, S., & Wright, R. J. (2004). Teaching Mathematics in Primary Schools. Sidney: Allen and Unwin.

Zuhri, D. (1998). Proses Berpikir Siswa Kelas II SMP Negeri 16 Pekanbaru dalam Menyelesaikan Soal-Soal Perbandingan Senilai dan Perbandingan Berbalik Nilai. Universitas Negeri Surabaya.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29103/mjml.v2i2.1468

Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 664 times
 PDF Downloaded : 146 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Indra Sari, Marwan Marwan, Hajidin Hajidin

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

CURRENT INDEXING :

Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML) are abstracting & indexing in the following databases:

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTEScUl3v2Etgwe2TfFrBLazt810llmwl9VyyFd2lwnNa88qoHn

Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML) also has been listed and archives in the following databases: SHERPA/RoMEO Policy, LOCKSS Archieving System, ULRICHSWEB Proquest, EZB Universitat Reqensburq, Open Science Directory by EBSCO information service and ROAD ISSN.