Differences in the delivery of the corner in a baby who was bathed in warm water with a baby whipped in a wet tool at batara siang hospital of Pangkep District
Abstract
WHO (2000), recommends umbilical cord care based on aseptic and dry principles and no longer recommended to use alcohol but with open care. The umbilical cord should also not be tightly closed with anything, because it will make it moist. In addition to slowing the release of the umbilical cord, it also poses a risk of infection. Even if you have to close. according to Taylor (2003, dalam Nopriyarti, 2013) cover or tie loosely at the top of the umbilical cord with sterile gauze. The research used quasi-experimental research. The design of this study used the Experimental Design- Equivalent Time Sample method, which is a quasi-experimental design by treating the experimental group (X1), namely taking a warm bath and the control group (X0), which was wiped with a wet towel, alternately with random determination (Suharsaputra, 2012). The mandatory output in this research is publishing international journals, while the additional output is publishing national journals it can be seen that the average length of umbilical cord detachment of infants who were bathed in warm water (experimental group) was 110.8 hours, while the average length of time to release the umbilical cord of infants who were wiped with a wet towel (control group) was 76.9 hours or 6.6 days. The average difference between the two groups is 24,72 hours. The results of the statistical test obtained a P-value (<0.001), meaning that at alpha 5% there was a significant difference in the average length of umbilical cord detachment between babies who were wiped with a wet towel, which was 2.01 days and babies who were bathed in warm water, which was 4,01 day. So that the treatment of babies who are wiped with a wet towel is more effective and the umbilical cord is removed faster than the care of babies who are bathed in warm water. There was a significant difference between the In umbilical cord care, there was a significant difference in the average length of umbilical cord detachment between babies who were wiped with a wet towel and babies who were bathed in warm water.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Arif, Al. (2004). The Right Way to Take Care of Babies. http://www.anakjenius.comdiung gah on 26 August 2014
Azz, City Ardhillah. (2012). Everything Baby. Yogyakarata : Surya Media Utama.
Bejo. (2010). Mother's Level of Knowledge About Central Cord Care. http://bejocommunity.com/2010/ 05/kti-level-knowledge-ibu-about.
Bidanku.com. How to Bathe a Baby. http://bidanku.com/cara-mandikan-baby. Research.
Masinon. (2013). Differences in the Effectiveness of Umbilical Cord Treatment at Sarinah Hospital
Cord Treatment with or Pekanbaru in 2013.
No Alcohol Against Old Release of the umbilical cord in a new baby Born in the Maternity Home Mother's Love and Mother's Hope Maternity Home Choirunnisa. 2009. Newborn Care. http://digilib.unimus.ac.id/files/disk1/1 22/jtptunimus-gdl-sitimusari-6051-1- babi.pdf
Goddess. (2010). Neonatal Care for Babies and Toddlers. Jakarta: Salemba Medika.
Pekanbaru City Health Office. (2014). Report on Infant Mortality Rate in 2012.
Dwisuda, (2009). Description of Knowledge of Post Partum Mothers About Umbilical Cord Care at RSIA Sarinah Pekanbaru Pekanbaru in 2009.
Fhatimah. (2012). Relationship of Mother's Knowledge About How to Care for Pangkalan Kerinci Rope, Pelalawan Regency.
Varney H, Kriebs JM, Gegor CL. (2008). Textbook of Midwifery Care. Edition 4. Jakarta: EGC, 2, pp : 894-934.
Azizah RA, Nirmasari C, Andayani , A. (2015). Differences in the time of the release of the umbilical cord wrapped in sterile gauze and open care for infants in the working area of the Ambarawa Public Health Center, Semarang Regency.
Sodikin. (2009). Cord Care. Jakarta: EGC, pp: 67.
Aprillia, Y. (2014). Wharton Jelly “The Magic Jelly” in the Umbilical Cord. http://www.bidankita.com/wharton-jelly-si-jelly-ajaib-dalam-tali-central.
Cunningham ,et al (2014). Williams Obstetrics. Edition 23. Jakarta: EGC, 1, pp: 63-436.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v3i4.5902
Article Metrics
Abstract Views : 219 timesPDF Downloaded : 54 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 H Herman