Implementation of Guided Inquiry Model Based on Visual Cartoon Media Towards Skills of Science Process and Mastery of Concepts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v2i5.2564Keywords:
Guided Inquiry Model, Visual Cartoon Media, Science Process Skills And Mastery of ConceptsAbstract
This research is motivated by the science process skills of students who are still low. Factors causing low science process skills are mastery of students' concepts of subject matter is still low. The purpose of this study is 1) to describe the feasibility of learning by implementing guided inquiry model based on visual cartoon media on science process skills and mastery of the concept of environmental pollution, 2) to obtain data on guided inquiry model based on visual cartoon media can improve environmental pollution science process skills, 3) to find out the implementation of guided inquiry model based on visual cartoon media can improve mastery of the concept of environmental pollution, 4) to uncover student responses by implementing guided inquiry model based on visual cartoon media on science process skills and mastery of the concept of environmental pollution. The method used in this study is a mixed method (mixed methods research design). The sampling technique using cluster random sampling was obtained by 2 classes, each of which amounted to 40 students for the experimental class and 40 students for the control class. The research instrument used was task and rubric science process skills, mastery concept essay tests, student response questionnaires to learning and observation sheets of teacher and student activities. The data analysis technique used is the normality test, homogeneity test and hypothesis test. Based on the results of the analysis of the hypothesis test shows the value of t = 4.476 with Sig. 0.001 <0.05 means that the implementation of guided inquiry model based on visual cartoon media can improve students' science process skills in the concept of environmental pollution. Based on the results of the test analysis shows the value t = 8.486 with Sig. 0.001 < 0.05 means that the implementation of the guided inquiry model based on visual cartoon media can improve the mastery of the concept of environmental pollution.
References
Amita Dhaaka. (2012). Research Article. Biological Science Inquiry Model And Biology Teaching. Principal, Department of Education, RG College of Education, G.Noida, Uttar Pradesh, INDIA. Bookman International Journal of Accounts, Economics & Business Management, Vol. 1 No. 2, October-November-December 2012 / 80. ISSN No. 2319-426X © Bookman International Journals.
Ashiq Hussain. Muhammad Azeem. (2011). Physics Teaching Methods: Scientific Inquiry Vs Traditional Lecture. Punjab Education Assessment System (PEAS) Pakistan Azra Shakoor Doctoral Research Scholar University of Education, College Road, Township Lahore, Pakistan. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 1 No. 19.
Elisa M. Stone. (2014). Guiding Students to Develop an Understanding of Scientific Inquiry: A Science Skills Approach to Instruction. Berkeley Science & Math Initiative, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-3860. CBE”Life Sciences Education. Vol. 13, 90-101, Spring 2014.
Eva Sri Nur. (2014). Implementasi Praktikum Berbesis Keterampilan Proses Sains Menggunakan LKS Berbantu Multimedia terhadap Peningkatan Penguasaan Konsep dan Sikap Ilmiah pada Konsep Pencemaran Lingkungan. Tesis. Kuningan. Universitas Kuningan.
Hanifah, Sarah. (2012). Pengaruh metode model guided inquiry terhadap keterampilan proses sains. (Online). Jurnal. Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS Tersedia :http://psb-psma.org/content/blog/3992-keterampilan-proses-sains (diakses 17 April 2017). Hal 51-52.
Christoph Randler, Eda Demirhan, Peter Wüst-Ackermann, and Inga H. Desch. (2016). Influence of a Dissection Video Clip on Anxiety, Affect, and Self-Efficacy in Educational Dissection: A Treatment Study.Department of Biology, University of Education Heidelberg, D-69121 Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Special Education, Sakarya University, Sakarya 54300, Turkey. CBE”Life Sciences Education.
Demircioglu,T. (2012). The effect of argument-driven inquiry on pre-service science teachers' attitudes and argumentation skills. Procedia sicial and Behavioral scinces. Cukurova University, Faculty of Education, saricum/Adana, Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 116 ( 2014 ) 4511 - 4516.
Jennifer K. Hood - De Grenier. (2012). Undergraduate Cell Biology LaboratoryA Western Blot-based Investigation of the Yeast Secretory Pathway Designed for an Intermediate-Level. CBE”Life Sciences Education. Vol. 7, 107-117.
Jodie Jenkinson and Ga el McGill. (2012). Visualizing Protein Interactions and Dynamics: Evolving a Visual Language for Molecular Animation. Journal. CBE”Life Sciences Education. Vol. 11, 103-110.
Julia J. Snyder, B. Elijah Carter, and Jason R. Wiles. (2015). Implementation of the Peer-Led Team-Learning Instructional Model as a Stopgap Measure Improves Student Achievement for Students Opting Out of Laboratory. Department of Biology and Department of Science Teaching, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244. CBE”Life Sciences Education Vol. 14, 1-6, Spring.
Kim Quillin and Stephen Thomas. (2015). Visual-to-Learn: A Framework for Using Visual to Promote Model-Based Reasoning in Biology Department of Biological Sciences, Salisbury University, Salisbury, MD 21801.
Department of Zoology, Michigan State University Museum, Center for Integrative Studies in General Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48823 Submitted August 16, 2014; Revised October 3, 2014;
Accepted October 11, 2014 Monitoring Editor: Mary Lee Ledbette. CBE-Life Sciences Education. Vol. 14, 1-16
Marga Madhur and Christine Broussa. (2012). Do I Need to Know This for the Exam? Using Popular Media, Inquiry-based Laboratories, and a Community of Scientific Practice to Motivate Students to Learn Developmental Biology. Education Department, College of Education and Organizational Leadership andDepartment of Biology College of Arts and Sciences, University of La Verne, La Verne, CA 9175. CBE”Life Sciences Education. Vol. 7, 36-4.
McNeill, K.L. (2011). Elementary Students View of Explanation, Argumentation and Evidence and Abilities to Construct Arguments Over the School Year. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, CBE”Life Sciences Education 48 (7), 793-823.
Meltem Duran. (2014). A study on 7th grade students' inquiry and communication Competencies. Gazi Education Faculty, Science Education Department, Gazi University, 06500, Ankara,Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 116 ( 2014 ) 4511 - 4516.
Mila G, Merce and Andersen, Christopher. (2011). Developmental Change in Notetaking during Scientific Inquiry. International Journal of Science Education. Vol: 29.
Moraru, M, (2000). Study on the Students' Opinion about the Effectivenessof Lecture-Debate in Teaching. Procedoia social and behavioral sciences.elsevier Roamnai.hal /PP 63-68.
Nurshamshida Md Shamsudin, Nabilah Abdullah, Nurlatifah Yaamat. (2013). Strategies of Teaching Science Using an Inquiry Based Science Education (IBSE) by Novice Chemistry Teachers Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam 40200, Selangor, Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 90 ( 2013 ) 583 - 592.
Omer Acara, Bruce R. Patton. (2015). Argumentation and formal reasoning skillsin an argumentationbased guided inquiry course. aDepartment of Elementary Education, Kocaeli University, Koceli, Turkey. Department of Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 46 ( 2012 ) 4756 - 4760.
Oktaviani, Delisha. (2011). Pengaruh metode model guided inquiry terhadap keterampilan proses sains. (Online). Jurnal. Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS Tersedia :http://psb-psma.org/content/blog/3992-keterampilan-proses-sains (diakses 28 April 2017). Hal: 33-34.
Sally G. Hoskins,David Lopatto, and Leslie M. Stevens. (2013). The C.R.E.A.T.E. Approach to Primary Literature Shifts Undergraduates Self-Assessed Ability to Read and Analyze. Journal, Attitudes about Science, and Epistemological Belief. Department of Biology and The Graduate Center, City College of the City University. CBE”Life Sciences Education. Vol. 10, 368-378.
Sri Nuraeni. (2011). Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif dan Pemahaman Konsep Pencemaran Lingkungan (Studi pada Siswa kelas VII di SMP Negeri 2 Maleber). Tesis. Kuningan. Universitas Kuningan.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Please find the rights and licenses in International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies (IJEVS)
1. License
The article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2. Authors Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
IJEVS's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, IJEVS permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work. Users will also need to attribute authors and IJEVS on distributing works in the journal.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
- Copyright, and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books,
- The right to self-archive the article,
- the right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
6. Termination
This agreement can be terminated by the author or IJEVS upon two months notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating partys notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of IJEVS.
7. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by IJEVS or its sublicensee.
8. Miscellaneous
IJEVS will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the articles editorial process is successfully completed and IJEVS or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. IJEVS may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers.
