Development of Psychomotor Domain Assessment Instrument on Brake System Competence in SMKN 1 Jetis Mojokerto

Authors

  • Sudirman Rizki Ariyanto Technology and Vocational Education, Postgraduate of Universitas Negeri Surabaya, East Java, 60213
  • Munoto Munoto Technology and Vocational Education, Postgraduate of Universitas Negeri Surabaya, East Java, 60213
  • Muhaji Muhaji Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, East Java, 6023,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v1i6.1648

Keywords:

Vocational High School, Psychomotor Domain Assessment, ADDIE Model, Brake System Competence

Abstract

Many factors influence the low number of skilled vocational high school graduates. One factor that is the leading cause is the lack of instruments that can be used in the learning process, especially authentic instruments, to assess students' abilities in the psychomotor domain. Students who are dominant in the cognitive sphere are not necessarily skilled in the psychomotor realm, especially when using the equipment and making improvements to the brake system. The purpose of this study is to develop an assessment instrument that is appropriate to be used by the teacher in evaluating the psychomotor domain's abilities, specifically for the brake system competency. This research is development research that uses ADDIE models as a reference for research. ADDIE model has five stages of development that need to be considered, including analysis; (2) design; (3) development; (4) implementations; and (5) evaluation. Based on the results of the analysis and discussion of the psychomotor domain assessment instrument for the competency of the brake system that was developed to be suitable for use in the learning process. Feasibility is proven from the results of the validation of experts who get an assessment of 4.66 with a very valid category. The instrument reliability test results that get the Cronbach's alpha value of 0.895, and the value of inter-observer reliability is 0.740. In addition, the instrument is also practical when used in the learning process. This was evidenced by the acquisition of practicality test value of 3.31 and entered in the practical category.

References

Ahmad, A., Kamin, Y., & Md.Nasir, A. . (2018). Applying Psychomotor Domain for Competency Based Teaching in Vocational Education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1049, 012049. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1049/1/012049

Ariyanto, S. R., Munoto, M., & Muhaji, M. (2019). Development of affective authentic assessment instruments for automotive engineering expertise in vocational school. TAMAN VOKASI, 7(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.30738/jtv.v7i1.4777

Begam, A. A. A., & Tholappan, A. (2018). Psychomotor domain of Blooms taxonomy in teacher education. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 6(3), 11-14. https://doi.org/10.1021/am303261c

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6

Chowdhury, F. (2018). Application of Rubrics in the Classroom: A Vital Tool for Improvement in Assessment, Feedback and Learning. International Education Studies, 12(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v12n1p61

Dimyati, & Mujiono. (2006). Belajar dan pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Hebebci, M., Kucuk, S., Celik, I., Akturk, A., Sahin, I., & Eren, F. (2014). Designing an Online Case-Based Library for Technology Integration in Teacher Education. Tojet - The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(8), 1253-1258.

Kasilingam, G., Ramalingam, M., & Chinnavan, E. (2014). Assessment of learning domains to improve students learning in higher education. Journal of Young Pharmacists, 6(1), 27-33. https://doi.org/10.5530/jyp.2014.1.5

Lekwa, A. J., Reddy, L. A., Dudek, C. M., & Hua, A. N. (2019). Assessment of teaching to predict gains in student achievement in urban schools. School Psychology, 34(3), 271-280. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000293

Mohamad, M. M., Sulaiman, N. L., Sern, L. C., & Salleh, K. M. (2015). Measuring the Validity and Reliability of Research Instruments. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 164-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.129

Nahadi, Firman, H., & Yulina, E. (2016). Performance assessment instrument to assess the senior high students psychomotor for the salt hydrolysis material. 040005. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4941155

Nichols Hess, A., & Greer, K. (2016). Designing for Engagement: Using the ADDIE Model to Integrate High-Impact Practices into an Online Information Literacy Course. Comminfolit, 10(2), 264. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2016.10.2.27

Scholtes, V. A., Terwee, C. B., & Poolman, R. W. (2011). What makes a measurement instrument valid and reliable? Injury, 42(3), 236-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2010.11.042.

Shirali, G., Shekari, M., & Angali, K. A. (2018). Assessing Reliability and Validity of an Instrument for Measuring Resilience Safety Culture in Sociotechnical Systems. Safety and Health at Work, 9(3), 296-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2017.07.010.

Souza, A. C. de, Alexandre, N. M. C., Guirardello, E. de B., Souza, A. C. de, Alexandre, N. M. C., & Guirardello, E. de B. (2017). Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, 26(3), 649-659. https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022.

Sumarni, W., Supardi, K. I., & Widiarti, N. (2018). Development of assessment instruments to measure critical thinking skills. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 349, 012066. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/349/1/012066

Suparmin, Bakar, U. A., Giyoto, & Fauzi, A. (2012). Validitas, reliabilitas, dan kepraktisan ujian melalui observasi dan bentuk lisan bagi kelas besar pada prodi PAI Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Bahasa Iain Surakarta. Kodifikasia, 6(1), 65-76.

Downloads

Published

2019-08-26

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 6 (2019): October 2019

Section

Articles

License

Please find the rights and licenses in International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies (IJEVS)

1. License

The article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

2. Authors Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).

3. User Rights

IJEVS's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, IJEVS permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work. Users will also need to attribute authors and IJEVS on distributing works in the journal.

4. Rights of Authors

Authors retain the following rights:

  • Copyright, and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
  • The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books,
  • The right to self-archive the article,
  • the right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies).

5. Co-Authorship

If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.

6. Termination

This agreement can be terminated by the author or IJEVS upon two months notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating partys notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of IJEVS. 

7. Royalties

This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by IJEVS or its sublicensee.

8. Miscellaneous

IJEVS will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the articles editorial process is successfully completed and IJEVS or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. IJEVS may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers.