Evaluating the Implementation of Policy on Education Board

Endang Sri Budi Herawati, Suryadi Suryadi, Bejdo Sujanto

Abstract


This study was designed to discuss government policies on the Board Education, so conclusions can be obtained about these policies for the sake of improving the quality of education services. This study uses evaluation with a discrepancy evaluation model (DEM) consisting of four works: design, installation, process, and product. The data were collected through a combination of observation techniques, document studies, interviews, and questionnaires, with qualitative data analysis. The data sources in this study were the Education Board, the Education Office, DPRD, BAPPEDA, and several school principals who were deliberately chosen to collect research data. The results showed that unclear rules regarding funding sources for the Board Education was the main obstacle in the implementation of the work program. At the design and installation stage, there are no gaps, and policies have been applied by reference to existing rules. However, at the process and product stages, there are gaps where only a small number of programs have been prepared. This also results in a gap at the product stage, which results in the goal of forming an Education Board not being achieved. Work programs as operational roles and functions of the Board Education have been arranged according to the purpose of its formation. but limited budget and human resources were obstacles to optimizing the contribution of Board Education to improving the quality of education services. Full support from the government and regional government related to the allocation of funds for the operation of the Board Education, both through the allocation of APBD and through the Regulations of the Regent related to managing the allocation of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) activities from various companies in Cirebon District, so that improving the quality of education services can be more equitable, and the role of DUDI in developing education can be felt evenly throughout the Cirebon district. The Education Agency's readiness is needed to accept the presence of the Education Council as a strategic partner in the development of Education, and the need for delegation of authority related to the development and empowerment of the School Committee by the Education Board.


Keywords


Board of Education; Community Participation; Gap Evaluation Model

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aref, A. (2019). Community Participation for Educational Planning and Development.

BAPPEDA Cirebon Regency. Socio-Cultural Profile of Cirebon Regency in (2017). Cirebon.

Caldwell, B. J. (2005). School-based management International Institute for Educational Planning. Paris, perancis: The International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP). Retrieved

from http://www.iaoed.org/downloads/Edpol3.pdf

Cheng, Y. C. (1996). School Effectiveness and School-based Management: A Mechanism for Developmen. London, Washington DC: The Falmer Press.

Coles, J. L., Daniel, N. D., & Naveen, L. (2012). Board Advising. SSRN Electronic Journal.

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2002250

Ministry of Education. Reference operational activities and school committee performance indicators (2003). Ministry Directorate General Of Basic And Medium Education, Educational Board Development Team And School Committees, 2003

Depdiknas. Kepmendiknas No 044/U/2002 About the Board of Education and School Committee (2002).

Ehren, M. C. M., Honingh, M. E., Hooge, E. H., & O’Hara, J. (2013). Changing school board governance in primary education through school inspections. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 44(2), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214549969

Hendarman. (2012). The Role of Education Board in Improving The Quality of Service for Education, 18, 34–44. Retrieved from http://jurnaldikbud.kemdikbud.go.id/index.php/jpnk/article/view/67

Hooge, E., & Honingh, M. (2014). Are School Boards aware of the educational quality of their schools? Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 42(3), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213510509

Iwan Panji, W. (2018). Public Perception of The Role of The Education Board of Yogyakarta City, 5(7), 10–18. Retrieved from https://eprints.uny.ac.id/41713/

Johnson, P. A. (2012). School Board Governance. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 15(2), 83–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555458911413887

Evaluation Study on the Impact of the Education Board / School Committee's Contribution to the Improvement of Secondary Education Quality. (2011). Retrieved from http://staff.uny.ac.id/sites/default/files/penelitian/aprinuryantospdstmt/laporan-kajian-evaluasi-dampak-1.pdf

Decree of the Minister of National Education of the Republic of Indonesia Number 129a/U/2004 concerning Minimum Service Standards in the Field of Education (2004). Retrieved from

http://luk.staff.ugm.ac.id/atur/bsnp/Kepmendiknas129a-U-2004 Minimum Service Standards.pdf

Kompas.com. (2012). School Committees Utilized to Withdraw Wild Levies, Kompas.com.

Government Agency Performance Accountability Report (LAKIP) Cirebon District Education Office. (2018). Cirebon.

Mas, S. R. (2011). Community and Parent Participation in Education Organization. El-Hikmah, VIII(2), 184–196. Retrieved from http://ejournal.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/elhikmah/article/view/2243/pdf

Muhtadi, A. (2008). Comparative Study of Education Systems in Germany and South Korea. Yogyakarta State University.

Pailwar, V. K., Mahajan, V., & Africa, S. (2005). Janshala in Jharkhand : An experiment with community involvement in education, 6(3), 373–385.

Pardji. (2011). Meaning of the implementation of education and school committee. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 17(6), 469–475. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307798614_Definition of _Education_and_ School Committees

Cirebon District Government. Regional Regulations of Cirebon Regency No. 13 Tahun 2011 regarding the Implementation of Education (2011).

Government of the Republic of Indonesia. Government Regulation Number 17 of 2010 concerning Management and Implementation of Education (2010).

Pikiran Rakyat. (2015). The Education Board and School Committee Should Be Disbanded, Pikiran Rakyat online.

Education Blur Portrait of Cirebon Regency,Cirebon News online. (2016). Cirebon News Online.

Provus, M. M. (1969). The Discrepancy Evaluation Model An Approach to Local Program Improvement and Development. (B. J. McCormick, Ed.). USA: Pittsburgh Public Schools. Retrieved from

https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED030957

Santoso, Y., & Zulaikha, S. (2017). Autonomy And Community Participation On The Implementation Of School- Based Management In The City Of South Tangerang, 118, 1126–1131.

Suru, A. S. (2013). Community Participation in Improving the Quality of Education. Jurnal Eksekutif, (Vol 1, No 1 (2013)). Retrieved from http://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/jurnaleksekutif/article/view/2463

Suryono, A., Santosa, R., & Haryadi. (2013). Implementation of Government Regulation Number 66 of 2010 on Empowerment of the Education Board and School Committees. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 13(2).

National Education System Law (2003). https://doi.org/10.16309/j.cnki.issn.1007-1776.2003.03.004

Wiratno, B. (2016). Community Participation in Education, 26(1), 28–34. Retrieved from

http://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/jpis/article/view/2062/1564

Yau, H. K., & Cheng, A. L. F. (2011). Principals and Teachers’ perceptions of School policy as a key element of School-Based Management in Hong Kong Primary Schools. Spring, 9(1). Retrieved from

http://www.leadingtoday.org/weleadinlearning/Spring2011/Article 9 - V9N1 - Yau and Cheng.pdf




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v1i3.1584

Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 596 times
 PDF Downloaded : 143 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Endang Sri Budi Herawati, Suryadi Suryadi, Bejdo Sujanto