Evaluating the Implementation of Policy on Education Board
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v1i3.1584Keywords:
Board of Education, Community Participation, Gap Evaluation ModelAbstract
This study was designed to discuss government policies on the Board Education, so conclusions can be obtained about these policies for the sake of improving the quality of education services. This study uses evaluation with a discrepancy evaluation model (DEM) consisting of four works: design, installation, process, and product. The data were collected through a combination of observation techniques, document studies, interviews, and questionnaires, with qualitative data analysis. The data sources in this study were the Education Board, the Education Office, DPRD, BAPPEDA, and several school principals who were deliberately chosen to collect research data. The results showed that unclear rules regarding funding sources for the Board Education was the main obstacle in the implementation of the work program. At the design and installation stage, there are no gaps, and policies have been applied by reference to existing rules. However, at the process and product stages, there are gaps where only a small number of programs have been prepared. This also results in a gap at the product stage, which results in the goal of forming an Education Board not being achieved. Work programs as operational roles and functions of the Board Education have been arranged according to the purpose of its formation. but limited budget and human resources were obstacles to optimizing the contribution of Board Education to improving the quality of education services. Full support from the government and regional government related to the allocation of funds for the operation of the Board Education, both through the allocation of APBD and through the Regulations of the Regent related to managing the allocation of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) activities from various companies in Cirebon District, so that improving the quality of education services can be more equitable, and the role of DUDI in developing education can be felt evenly throughout the Cirebon district. The Education Agency's readiness is needed to accept the presence of the Education Council as a strategic partner in the development of Education, and the need for delegation of authority related to the development and empowerment of the School Committee by the Education Board.
References
Aref, A. (2019). Community Participation for Educational Planning and Development.
BAPPEDA Cirebon Regency. Socio-Cultural Profile of Cirebon Regency in (2017). Cirebon.
Caldwell, B. J. (2005). School-based management International Institute for Educational Planning. Paris, perancis: The International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP). Retrieved
from http://www.iaoed.org/downloads/Edpol3.pdf
Cheng, Y. C. (1996). School Effectiveness and School-based Management: A Mechanism for Developmen. London, Washington DC: The Falmer Press.
Coles, J. L., Daniel, N. D., & Naveen, L. (2012). Board Advising. SSRN Electronic Journal.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2002250
Ministry of Education. Reference operational activities and school committee performance indicators (2003). Ministry Directorate General Of Basic And Medium Education, Educational Board Development Team And School Committees, 2003
Depdiknas. Kepmendiknas No 044/U/2002 About the Board of Education and School Committee (2002).
Ehren, M. C. M., Honingh, M. E., Hooge, E. H., & OHara, J. (2013). Changing school board governance in primary education through school inspections. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 44(2), 205-223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214549969
Hendarman. (2012). The Role of Education Board in Improving The Quality of Service for Education, 18, 34-44. Retrieved from http://jurnaldikbud.kemdikbud.go.id/index.php/jpnk/article/view/67
Hooge, E., & Honingh, M. (2014). Are School Boards aware of the educational quality of their schools? Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 42(3), 139-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213510509
Iwan Panji, W. (2018). Public Perception of The Role of The Education Board of Yogyakarta City, 5(7), 10-18. Retrieved from https://eprints.uny.ac.id/41713/
Johnson, P. A. (2012). School Board Governance. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 15(2), 83-102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555458911413887
Evaluation Study on the Impact of the Education Board / School Committee's Contribution to the Improvement of Secondary Education Quality. (2011). Retrieved from http://staff.uny.ac.id/sites/default/files/penelitian/aprinuryantospdstmt/laporan-kajian-evaluasi-dampak-1.pdf
Decree of the Minister of National Education of the Republic of Indonesia Number 129a/U/2004 concerning Minimum Service Standards in the Field of Education (2004). Retrieved from
http://luk.staff.ugm.ac.id/atur/bsnp/Kepmendiknas129a-U-2004 Minimum Service Standards.pdf
Kompas.com. (2012). School Committees Utilized to Withdraw Wild Levies, Kompas.com.
Government Agency Performance Accountability Report (LAKIP) Cirebon District Education Office. (2018). Cirebon.
Mas, S. R. (2011). Community and Parent Participation in Education Organization. El-Hikmah, VIII(2), 184-196. Retrieved from http://ejournal.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/elhikmah/article/view/2243/pdf
Muhtadi, A. (2008). Comparative Study of Education Systems in Germany and South Korea. Yogyakarta State University.
Pailwar, V. K., Mahajan, V., & Africa, S. (2005). Janshala in Jharkhand : An experiment with community involvement in education, 6(3), 373-385.
Pardji. (2011). Meaning of the implementation of education and school committee. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 17(6), 469-475. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307798614_Definition of _Education_and_ School Committees
Cirebon District Government. Regional Regulations of Cirebon Regency No. 13 Tahun 2011 regarding the Implementation of Education (2011).
Government of the Republic of Indonesia. Government Regulation Number 17 of 2010 concerning Management and Implementation of Education (2010).
Pikiran Rakyat. (2015). The Education Board and School Committee Should Be Disbanded, Pikiran Rakyat online.
Education Blur Portrait of Cirebon Regency,Cirebon News online. (2016). Cirebon News Online.
Provus, M. M. (1969). The Discrepancy Evaluation Model An Approach to Local Program Improvement and Development. (B. J. McCormick, Ed.). USA: Pittsburgh Public Schools. Retrieved from
https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED030957
Santoso, Y., & Zulaikha, S. (2017). Autonomy And Community Participation On The Implementation Of School- Based Management In The City Of South Tangerang, 118, 1126-1131.
Suru, A. S. (2013). Community Participation in Improving the Quality of Education. Jurnal Eksekutif, (Vol 1, No 1 (2013)). Retrieved from http://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/jurnaleksekutif/article/view/2463
Suryono, A., Santosa, R., & Haryadi. (2013). Implementation of Government Regulation Number 66 of 2010 on Empowerment of the Education Board and School Committees. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 13(2).
National Education System Law (2003). https://doi.org/10.16309/j.cnki.issn.1007-1776.2003.03.004
Wiratno, B. (2016). Community Participation in Education, 26(1), 28-34. Retrieved from
http://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/jpis/article/view/2062/1564
Yau, H. K., & Cheng, A. L. F. (2011). Principals and Teachers perceptions of School policy as a key element of School-Based Management in Hong Kong Primary Schools. Spring, 9(1). Retrieved from
http://www.leadingtoday.org/weleadinlearning/Spring2011/Article 9 - V9N1 - Yau and Cheng.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Please find the rights and licenses in International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies (IJEVS)
1. License
The article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2. Authors Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
IJEVS's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, IJEVS permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work. Users will also need to attribute authors and IJEVS on distributing works in the journal.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
- Copyright, and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books,
- The right to self-archive the article,
- the right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
6. Termination
This agreement can be terminated by the author or IJEVS upon two months notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating partys notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of IJEVS.
7. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by IJEVS or its sublicensee.
8. Miscellaneous
IJEVS will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the articles editorial process is successfully completed and IJEVS or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. IJEVS may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers.
