Improving Proof Ability of Prospective Teachers with a Contextual Model on Trigonometry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29103/mjml.v3i1.2339Keywords:
Proof Ability, Contextual model, Prospective Teachers, TrigonometryAbstract
Proof ability of prospective teachers on Trigonometry material is still lacking. It can be seen when they carry out trigonometry proof that does not meet the proof indicators to conduct the research. This study aimed at improving proof ability of prospective teachers with a contextual model on Trigonometry materials. The research method used was classroom action research with the subjects of 30 students of Mathematics Education Study Program, State University of Malang, 2019. The research was conducted in two cycles by providing scaffolding action regarding proof steps, trigonometry identity scaffolding, and conflict cognitive of proof results. The research results showed that an increase of material indicator was 4%, an increase of completeness indicator was 24%, an increase of reason indicator was 59%, an increase of clarity indicator was 31%, an increase of conclusion indicator was 2%, and an increase of application capability indicator was 4% with a total increase of students ability was 23%.
References
Batlolona, J. R. (2016). Hasil Belajar Kognitif dan Respon Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Fisika pada Konsep Listrik Dinamis dengan Menerapkan Media Interaktif. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA UM, 1.
Beecher, J. A., Penna, J. A., & Bittinger, M. L. (2012). Algebra and Trigonometry.
Brown, J. R. (2017). Proofs and Guarantees. Intellectics and Comptational Logic, 39(4), 47-50.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00283-017-9730-1
Coggin, D. (1998). Long-Term Memory in Equity Style Indexes.
Gafur, A. (2003). Penerapan Konsep dan Prinsip Pembelajaran Kontekstual. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 22, 1-17.
Hurst, M., & Cordes, S. (2017). When Being Good at Math Is Not Enough : How Students Beliefs About the Nature of Mathematics Impact Decisions Education. Understanding Emotions in Mathematical Thinking and Learning (Vol. 2009). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802218-4.00008-X
Hyder, S. I., & Bhamani, S. (2017). Blooms Taxonomy (Cognitive Domain) in Higher Education Settings: Reflection Brief. Journal of Education and Educational Development, (December 2016). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.14634.62406
Maharani, A. A. P., & Widhiasih, L. K. S. (2016). Respon Siswa Terhadap Umpan Balik Guru Saat Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris di SD Saraswati 5 Denpasar. Jurnal Bakti Saraswati, 05(02), 11.
Mills, S. (2016). Conceptual Understanding : A Concept Analysis Conceptual Understanding: A Concept Analysis. The Qualitative Report, 21(3), 546-557. Retrieved from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2308&context=tqr
Mulhamah, & Susilahudin, P. (2016). Penerapan Pembelajaran Kontekstual dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Pendidikan Matematika FITK Institut Agama Islam Negeri Mataram, 10(1).
NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, 07(4), 44-54.
Pinto, A., & Karsenty, R. (2017). From course design to presentations of proofs : How mathematics professors attend to student independent proof reading. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, (November), 0-1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.11.008
Smith, B. P. (2010). Instructional Strategies in Family and Consumer Sciences : Implementing the Contextual Teaching and Learning Pedagogical Model. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences Education, 28(1), 23-38.
Stylianides, G. J., Stylianides, A. J., & Philippou, G. (2007). Preservice teachers knowledge of proof by mathematical induction, (June). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9034-z
Subanji. (2016). Teori Defragmentasi Struktur Berpikir dalam Mengonstruksi Konsep dan Pemecahan Masalah. State University of Malang, 1(7), 1-30.
Sukoharjo, D. I. K. (2016). Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Problem Posing dan Problem Solving dengan Pendekatan PMR terhadap Prestasi Belajar dan Kemampuan. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 4(2), 199-214.
Surya, E. (2017). Penerapan Pendekatan Pembelajaran Kontekstual ( CTL ) Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahamana Konsep Matematika Siswa Pada Materi Himpunan Di Kelas VII SMP Muhammadiyah 2 Medan, (December).
Susanto, A. M. P. S. K. H. (2014). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Konstekstual dengan Pendekatan Snowball Throwing untuk Mengembangkan Karakter Komunikatif dan Rasa Ingin Tahu Siswa SMP. Unnes Physics Education Journal, 3(1).
Susiaty. (2018). Peningkatan kemampuan pembuktian matematis melalui model pembelajaran problem posing, 6(1), 128-137.
Suwandy, F. I., & Mangkurat, U. L. (2017). Strategi Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching and Learning Untuk Meningktakan Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi. UNLAM PRESS, 1-9.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Please find the rights and licenses in Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML)
1. License
The article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2. Authors Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
MJML's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, MJML permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work. Users will also need to attribute authors and MJML on distributing works in the journal.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
- Copyright, and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books,
- The right to self-archive the article,
- the right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
6. Termination
This agreement can be terminated by the author or MJML upon two months notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating partys notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of MJML.
7. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by MJML or its sublicensee.
8. Miscellaneous
MJML will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the articles editorial process is successfully completed and MJML or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. MJML may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers.
