Using of Wingeom Software in Geometry Learning to Improving the of Mathematical Representation Ability

Mutia Fonna, M Mursalin

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to determine the use of Wingeom software in geometry learning in the Department of Mathematics Education. This type of research is quasi-experimental. This study examines the use of Wingeom software in geometry learning in the Department of Mathematics Education. The population in this study were all students of the Department of Mathematics Education under the Faculty Education and Teacher Training, Universitas Malikussaleh, and the samples were students of class A1 and class A2. The study was divided into two learning groups, namely the experimental group with the use of Wingeom Software and the control group with ordinary learning. This study begins with an instrument test which shows that (1) Validity indicates that the results are significant, (2) Very high reliability, (3) Good distinguishing power and (4) Moderate difficulty level. To test of homogeneity and normality that the data is homogeneous and normal. Based on the results of calculations using the t test at the significance level α = 0.05, obtained tcount of 4.59 with a significance value of 0.003 while the table of 1.68. Because tcount> ttable (3.127> 1.68) and significance <0.05 (0.003 <0.05). Then it can be concluded that the increase in the ability of mathematical representation of students who get learning with the use of Wingeom software is better than the ability of mathematical representation of students who get ordinary learning without Wingeom software.

Keywords


Wingeom Software; Geometry Learning; Mathematical Representation Ability;

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afandi, A. (2018). Difference of learning mathematics between open question model and conventional model. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML), 1(1), 13-18.

Istarani. (2011). 58 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif. Medan: Media Persada.

Putriani, D & Rahayu, C. (2018). The Effect of Discovery Learning Model Using Sunflowers in Circles on Mathematics Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 1(1), 22-25. doi:10.33122/ijtmer.v1i1.26

Silberman. (2013). 101 Strategi untuk Mengajar secara Aktif. Jakarta: Indeks.

Slameto, (2001). Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.

Sudjana. (2005). Metode Statistika. Bandung: Tarsito.

Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Dewi, S. (2016). Pengembangan Modul Matematika Diskrit berbasis Information and Communication Technology (ICT). Tesis SPs UNSYIAH. Banda Aceh: tidak diterbitkan.

Jones, B.F. dan Knuth, R.A. (1991). What does Research Say about Mathematics? [Online].Tersedia:http://www.ncrl.org/sdrs/stwesys/2math.html.[11 April 2017]

Masitoh, L. F., & Fitriyani, H. (2018). Improving students’ mathematics self-efficacy through problem based learning.Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML), 1(1), 26-30.

Mursalin, M., Nuraini, N. L. S., Purnomo, H., Damayanti, N. W., Kristanti, D., Rohim, A., ... & Fonna, M. (2018, September). The development of algebra teaching materials to foster students’ creative thinking skills in higher education. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1088, No. 1, p. 012101). IOP Publishing.

Mursalin, M. (2016). Pembelajaran Geometri Bidang Datar di Sekolah Dasar Berorientasi Teori Belajar Piaget. DIKMA (Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika), 4(2), 250-258.

NCTM (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

NCTM (2008).The Role of Technology in Teaching and Learning of Mathematics.

Plomp, T. (2010). Educational Desain Research: An Introduction to Educational Desain Research. Dalam Plomp, T, and Nienke N. (Eds). An Introductional to Educational Desain Research. Enschede: Nedherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.

Risnawati (2012). Pengaruh Pembelajaran dengan Pendekatan Induktif-deduktif berbantuan Program Cabri Geometry terhadap Peningkatan Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Tesis. SPs UPI. Bandung: tidak diterbitkan.

Sugiyono (2012). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Thahir, M., Roza, Y., & Murni, A. (2018). Validity of learning website of kapita selekta mathematics course at UIN Suska Riau Students. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML), 1(1), 19-25.

Trisnawati, T., Pratiwi, R., & Waziana, W. (2018). The effect of realistic mathematics education on student's mathematical communication ability. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML), 1(1), 31-35.

Usmadi & Ergusni (2018). Design of ARCSI Learning Model with Scientific Approach for Teaching Mathematics in School. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 1(1), 13-18. doi:10.33122/ijtmer.v1i1.28.

Wigati Tri Utami. 2012. Identifikasi Kesulitan dalam menyelesaikan Persoalan Matematika yang berkaitan dengan Pecahan di kelas VIII SMP N 3 Ngaglik Sleman tahun Ajaran 2011/2012. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29103/mjml.v1i2.1174

Article Metrics

#### view : 197 times
PDF 80 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Mutia Fonna, M Mursalin

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


CURRENT INDEXING


MJML journal is abstracting & indexing in the following databases:

width=
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTEScUl3v2Etgwe2TfFrBLazt810llmwl9VyyFd2lwnNa88qoHn

     

 


Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML)