Influence of Blended Learning Against Computational Thinking Students on Basic Programming Subjects is Reviewed From Self-Efficacy Students

Zaima Faiza Hakim, Munoto Munoto, I.G.P.Asto Buditjahjanto, Tri Rijanto

Abstract


The study aims to know the computational thinking students who are taught using blended learning and students taught using a direct learning model. To find out the thinking of students with self-efficacy owned by students . This type of research is experimental research using factorial design. The results of the study found that (1) Computational thinking students taught using blended learning are higher than the computational thinking students taught using direct learning models; (2) Computational thinking students with self-efficacy higher height than computational thinking students with self-efficacy low on the basic programming subjects; and (3) There is an interaction between learning models (blended learning and direct learning models) and self-efficacy against computational thinking students in basic programming subjects.


References


Alqurashi, Emtinan. (2016). "Self-Efficacy In Online Learning." Contemporary Issues in Education Research 45-51.

Alqurashi, Emtinan. (2016). "Self-Efficacy In Online Learning Environments: A Literature Review." Contemporary Issues in Education Research 9 (1): 45-52.

Bandura, Albert. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.

Bebras. n.d. Bebras Indonesia. Accessed April 8, 2019. http://bebras.or.id/v3/.

Darmawan, Deni. (2014). Pengembangan E-Learning Teori dan Desain. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Effendi, Empy, and Hartono Zhuang. (2005). E-Learning konsep dan aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Google. n.d. Computational Thinking For Educators. Accessed September 06, 2017. https://computationalthinkingcourse.withgoogle.com/unit.

Graham, C. (2006). Blended learning system, definitions, current trends and future directions. San Francisco: John Wiley and Sons.

Hubackova, Sarka, and Ilona Semradova. (2016). "Evaluation of blende learning." Procedia-Social and Behavioral 551-557.

Husamah. 2014. Pembelajaran Bauran (Blended Learning) Terampil Memadukan Keunggulan Pembelajaran Face-To-Face, E-learning Offline-Online dan Mobile Learning. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka Publisher.

Li, Ying, Yu Liu, and Pan Shu. (2015). "Teaching Research and Practice of Blended Learning Model Based on Computational Thinking." IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

Liao, Chun-Hsiung, and Wei-Lung Huang. (2009). "Community adaptability, computer and internet self-efficacy, and intention of blended learning." Int. J. Society Systems Science 209-226.

Rusman, Deni Kurniawan, and Cepi Riyana. (2011). Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Shea, Peter, and Temi Bidjerano. (2010). "Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments." Computers & Education 1721-1731.

Stapa, Muhamad Azhar, Mohamad Ibrahim, and Amri Yusof. (2015). "Engaging Vocational College Students Through Blended Learning: Improving Class Attendance and Participation." Procedia-Social and Behavioral 127-135.

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi: mixed methods. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Wing, Jeannette M. (2006). "Computational Thinking." Communication of the ACM 49 (3): 33-35.

Yalcinkaya, Deniz. (2015). "Why is Bblended learning for vocationally oriented language teaching?" Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science 1061-1068.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v2i5.2502

Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 849 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Zaima Faiza Hakim, Munoto Munoto, I.G.P.Asto Buditjahjanto, Tri Rijanto