The Effect of PDEODE Learning Model on Competency of Electronic and Electronic Basics Lessons Reviewed From The Ability of Formal Reaching Students of Class X TITL A In Raden Rahmat Mojosari Vocational School

Ayu Zulaikha Hidayati, Ismet Basuki, IGP Asto Buditjahjanto

Abstract


Improving student competence is very dependent on the learning model and students' formal reasoning abilities. This study aims to: (1) analyze differences in competencies between students taught with the PDEODE learning model and students taught using direct learning models in DLE subjects at SMK Raden Rahmat Mojosari, (2) analyze differences in competencies between students who have TKPFT and students who have TKPFR on DLE subjects at SMK Raden Rahmat Mojosari, (3) analyze the interaction between the use of learning models and TKPF on student competencies on DLE subjects at SMK Raden Rahmat Mojosari. This research is a type of experimental research that uses factorial analysis design. Data collection instruments were in the form of passive component social attitude competency observation sheets, passive component knowledge competency test sheets, passive component skills competency performance test sheets and formal reasoning ability test sheets for students. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that: (1) there are differences in competencies between students taught using the PDEODE learning model and students taught using direct learning models in DLE subjects at SMK Raden Rahmat Mojosari, (2) there are differences in competencies between students who have TKPFT and students who have TKPFR on DLE subjects at SMK Raden Rahmat Mojosari, (3) there is an interaction between the use of learning models and TKPF on student competencies in DLE subjects at SMK Raden Rahmat Mojosari.

Keywords


PDEODE Learning Models; Formal Reasoning Skills; DLE Subjects

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdurrahman, M., (1999). Pendidikan bagi anak berkesulitan belajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Achmad, S. (2017). Analyzing educational university students’ conceptions through smartphone-based pdeode*e tasks on magnetic field in several mediums. Mathematics, Science, and Computer Science Education (MSCEIS 2016). Advance online publication. Doi: 10.1063/1. 4983963.

Arikunto, S. (2001). Prosedur penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Arikunto, S. (2008). Evaluasi program pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Bayram, C. (2008). Learning science through the pdeode teaching strategy: helping student make sence of everyday situations. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 14(1), 39-43.

Bayram, C., Alipasa, A., & Mansoor, N. (2011). Investigating the effectiveness of a poe-based teaching activity on students, understanding of condensation. Springer Science and Business Media. Advance Online Publication. Doi: 10.1007/s11251-011-9169-2.

Blocher, Richard. (2004). Dasar elektronika. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Carina, S. R., & Samuli, K. (2003). Promoting the conceptual understanding of engineering students through visualisation. Global J. of Engng. Educ.,7(2), 184-194.

Dimyati dan Mudjiono. (1999). Belajar dan pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Dimyati dan Mudjiono. (2006). Belajar dan pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Kehinde, A. A., Jumoke, B. B., & Olajumoke, S. (2017). Effectiveness of learning cycle models on nigerian senior secondary students’ anxiety towards chemistry. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioral Science, 21(1), 1-13.

Moeslim, S. (2013). Kisi-kisi lembar pengamatan hasil belajar. Surabaya: Unipres Unesa.

Nur, (2000). Pengajaran langsung. Surabaya: University Press.

Raden, R. W., Siswoyo, Fauzi, B. (2015). Pengaruh model pembelajaran pdeode terhadap hasil belajar kognitif fisika siswa SMA. Seminar Nasional Fisika, 4(3), 199-210.

Riduwan. (2006). Dasar-dasar statistika. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Rusyan, Tabrani., Kusdinar, Atang, Arifin, Zainal. (1989). Pendekatan dalam proses belajar mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Karya.

Sudjana, Nana. (2001). Penilaian hasil proses belajar mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

Sudjana. (2005). Metoda statistika. Bandung: Tarsito.

Sugiyono, (2009). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tabitha, S. H. W., Mohamad, A., Siti, Z., & Mimien, H. (2017). Students’ critical thinking improvement through pdeode and stad combination in the nutrition and health lecture. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJRE), 6 (2), 110-117.

Tismi, D., & Aloysius, D., C. (2016). The effect of pdeode learning strategy in the different academic abilities on students’ critical thinking skills in senior high school. European Journal of Education Studies, 2(5), 11-21.

Tismi, D., Herawati, S., & Aloysius, D. C. (2016) Pengaruh strategi pembelajaran pdeode pada kemampuan akademik berbeda terhadap hasil belajar siswa di kota Makassar. Seminar Nasional IIFKIP dengan Studi Lingkungan dan Kependudukan. 12 (3), 15-26.

Tabitha, S. H. W., Mohamad, A., Siti, Z., & Mimien, H. (2016). The effect of pdeode strategy on the concept and retention mastery in nutrition and health course on students with different ability. ICTTE FKIP UNS, 1(1), 52-65.

Trianto. (2007). Model pembelajaran terpadu dalam teori dan praktik. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka Publisher.

Uno, Hamzah. (2006). Perencanaan pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v1i6.1667

Article Metrics

#### view : 131 times
PDF 20 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Ayu Zulaikha Hidayati, Ismet Basuki, IGP Asto Buditjahjanto


International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies (IJEVS)

E-ISSN : 2684-6950