ILMIZI: Innovation Learning Model for Natural Science and Environmental Learning based on HOTS

Ilmi Zajuli Ichsan


Natural science and environmental learning in the 21st century require Higher order thinking skills (HOTS). The purpose of this study was to develop an ILMIZI learning model. The method used is research and development carried out in June-July 2019. The results of the study showed that the ILMIZI model syntax consists of 6 stages, start from Identify problem, Limitation problem, Make mind map, Interpret result, Analyze result, Interaction and evaluate. The six stages are the results of development which are expected to have an impact on the rise of HOTS. Validation results from various learning experts and teachers showed a score of 3.74 with a percentage of  93.50%  and a very valid category which means that the ILMIZI model is suitable for use in natural science learning (biology, physics, chemistry) and environmental learning at all levels of education. The conclusion is that the ILMIZI learning model was suitable for learning and expected to have an impact on HOTS students


Environmental learning; Higher Order Thinking Skills; ILMIZI; Learning Model; Natural Science Learning


Abdullah, A. H., Mokhtar, M., Halim, N. D. A., Ali, D. F., Tahir, L. M., & Kohar, U. H. A. (2017). Mathematics teachers’ level of knowledge and practice on the implementation of higher-order thinking skills (HOTS). Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(1), 3–17.

Afflerbach, P., Cho, B. Y., & Kim, J. Y. (2015). Conceptualizing and Assessing Higher-Order Thinking in Reading. Theory into Practice, 54(3), 203–212.

Ahokoski, E., Korventausta, M., Veermans, K., & Jaakkola, T. (2017). Teachers’ Experiences of an Inquiry Learning Training Course in Finland. Science Education International, 28(4), 305–314.

Aisyah, A., Salehuddin, K., Aman, I., Yasin, R. ., & Mimiko, N. (2018). Eliciting Elements of Higher Order Thinking Skills in the Higher Secondary Examination Question Structure in Japan and Malaysia Aznur. In Proceedings of the Regional Conference on Science, Technology and Social Sciences (RCSTSS 2016) (pp. 455–464). Springer Singapore.

Akbar, S. (2013). Instrumen Perangkat Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Anagün, Ş. S. (2018). Teachers’ Perceptions about the Relationship between 21st Century Skills and Managing Constructivist Learning Environments. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 825–840.

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airiasian, W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., & Pintrich, P. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of educational outcomes: Complete edition. New York: Longman.

Boholano, H. B. (2017). Smart Social Networking: 21st Century Teaching And Learning Skills. Research in Pedagogy, 7(1), 21–29.

Chalkiadaki, A. (2018). A Systematic Literature Review of 21st Century Skills and Competencies in Primary Education. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 1–16.

Chang, J. H., Chiu, P. S., & Huang, Y. M. (2018). A sharing mind map-oriented approach to enhance collaborative mobile learning With digital archiving systems. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1), 1–24.

Copley, P. (2013). The Need to Deliver Higher-Order Skills in the Context of Marketing in SMEs. Industry and Higher Education, 27(6), 465–476.

Daghistan, B. I. A. M. (2016). Mind Maps to Modify Lack of Attention among Saudi Kindergarten Children. International Education Studies, 9(4), 245–256.

Dubas, J. M., & Toledo, S. A. (2016). Taking higher order thinking seriously: Using Marzano’s taxonomy in the economics classroom. International Review of Economics Education, 21, 12–20.

Farisi, M. I. (2016). Developing the 21 st-century social studies skills through technology integration. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 17(1), 16–30.

Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2003). Educational Research An Introduction. San Fransisco: Pearson Education.

Garcia, L. C. (2015). Environmental Science Issues for Higher- Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Development: A Case Study in the Philippines. In Biology Education and Research in a Changing Planet (pp. 45–54).

Gruzd, A., Haythornthwaite, C., Paulin, D., Gilbert, S., & del Valle, M. E. (2018). Uses and Gratifications factors for social media use in teaching: Instructors’ perspectives. New Media & Society, 20(2), 475–494.

Gündüz, A. Y., Alemdağ, E., Yaşar, S., & Erdem, M. (2016). Design of a Problem-Based Online Learning Environment and Evaluation of its Effectiveness. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 15(3), 49–57.

Heinrichs, C. R. (2016). Exploring the Influence of 21st Century Skills in a Dual Language Program: A Case Study. International Journal of Teacher Leadership Heinrichs - Exploring the Influence, 37(1), 37–56. Retrieved from

Hidayat, W., Wahyudin, W., & Prabawanto, S. (2018). Improving students ’ creative mathematical reasoning ability students through adversity quotient and argument driven inquiry learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948.

Husamah, H., Fatmawati, D., & Setyawan, D. (2018). OIDDE Learning Model : Improving Higher Order Thinking Skills of Biology Teacher Candidates. Interntaional Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 249–264.

Ichsan, I. Z., Sigit, D. V., & Miarsyah, M. (2019). Environmental Learning Based on Higher Order Thinking Skills: A Needs Assessment. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 1(1), 21–24.

Istiana, R., & Awaludin, M. T. (2018). Enhancing biology education students ability to solve problems in environmental science material through inquiri model-based lesson study. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 11(1), 57–66.

Kartikaningtyas, V., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Riyadi, R. (2018). The effect of brain based learning with contextual approach viewed from adversity quotient The effect of brain based learning with contextual approach viewed from adversity quotient. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1022.

Khan, F. M. A., & Masood, M. (2015). The Effectiveness of an Interactive Multimedia Courseware with Cooperative Mastery Approach in Enhancing Higher Order Thinking Skills in Learning Cellular Respiration. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 977–984.

Khuana, K., Khuana, T., & Santiboon, T. (2017). An instructional design model with the cultivating research-based learning strategies for fostering teacher students creative thinking abilities. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(15), 712–724.

Kinay, I., & Bagceci, B. (2016). The Investigation of the Effects of Authentic Assessment Approach on Prospective Teachers’ Problem-Solving Skills. International Education Studies, 9(8), 51–59.

Lewis, C. (2016). How does lesson study improve mathematics instruction? ZDM - Mathematics Education, 48(4), 571–580.

Markaki, V. (2014). Environmental Education through Inquiry and Technology. Science Education International, 25(1), 86–92.

Mercer-Mapstone, L., & Kuchel, L. (2017). Core Skills for Effective Science Communication: A Teaching Resource for Undergraduate Science Education. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 7(2), 181–201.

Miller, A. L. (2018). The Role of Creative Coursework in Skill Development for University Seniors. Global Education Review, 5(1), 88–107.

Muhlisin, A. (2018). Analysis of students’response of the implementation of rms (reading, mind mapping, and sharing) learning model in philosophy of science. Unnes Science Education Journal, 7(1).

Mustam, B., & Daniel, E. S. (2016). Informal and Formal Environmental Education Infusion: Actions of Malaysian Teachers and Parents among Students in a Polluted Area. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(1), 9–20. Retrieved from

Narayanan, S., & Adithan, M. (2015). Analysis of Question Papers in Engineering Courses with Respect to HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skills). American Journal of Engineering Education, 6(1), 1–10.

Polat, O., Yavuz, E. A., & Tunc, A. B. O. (2017). The effect of using mind maps on the development of maths and science skills. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 12(1), 32–45.

Ratumanan, T. ., & Laurens, T. (2006). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar yang Relevan dengan Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi. Surabaya: Unesa University Press.

Sadiqin, I. K., Sholahuddin, A., & Santoso, U. T. (2017). Students ’ Difficulties on Science Learning with Prototype Problem-Solving Based Teaching and Learning Material : A Study Evaluation of Development Research. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 100, 279–282.

Sandberg, K. W., & Ohman, G. (2011). Learning in innovation development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 379–383.

Saputri, A. C., Sajidan, S., Rinanto, Y., Afandi, A., & Prasetyanti, N. M. (2018). Improving Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Cell-Metabolism Learning Using Stimulating Higher Order Thinking Skills Model. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 327–342.

Smith, T. (2014). Elementary Science Instruction: Examining a Virtual Environment for Evidence of Learning, Engagement, and 21st Century Competencies. Education Sciences, 4(1), 122–138.

Tajudin, N. M., & Chinnappan, M. (2016). The Link between Higher Order Thinking Skills, Representation and Concepts in Enhancing TIMSS Tasks. International Journal of Instruction, 9(2), 199–214.

Thomas, J. F., & Fatherly, S. (2017). The Roadmap Seminar: Preparing Students for Success in Learning Communities. Learning Communities: Research & Practice, 5(2), 7.

Urbani, J. M., Truesdell, E., Urbani, J. M., Roshandel, S., Michaels, R., & Truesdell, E. (2017). Developing and Modeling 21st-Century Skills with Preservice Teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 44(4), 27–51.

Utami, W. S., Sumarmi, S., Ruja, I. N., & Utaya, S. (2016). The Effectiveness of Geography Student Worksheet to Develop Learning Experiences for High School Students. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(3), 315–321.

Widiana, I. W., & Jampel, I. N. (2016). Improving Students’ Creative Thinking and Achievement through The Implementation of Multiple Intelligence Approach with Mind Mapping. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 5(3), 246–254.

Wolfson, T., & Funke, P. N. (2014). Communication, class and concentric media practices: Developing a contemporary rubric1. New Media and Society, 16(3), 363–380.

Xia, B. S. (2017). An In-Depth Analysis of Teaching Themes and the Quality of Teaching in Higher Education: Evidence from the Programming Education Environments. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(2), 245–254.

Yang, C.-M. (2018). Applying Design Thinking as a Method for Teaching Packaging Design. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(5), 52–61.

Yang, K. K., Lee, L., Hong, Z. R., & Lin, H. S. (2016). Investigation of effective strategies for developing creative science thinking. International Journal of Science Education, 38(13), 2133–2151.

Yusop, F. D., & Sumari, M. (2013). The Use of Social Media Technologies among Malaysian Youth. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 1204–1209.

Yusuf, M. M., Amin, M., & Nugrahaningsih. (2017). Developing of Instructional Media-Based Animation Video on Enzyme and Metabolism Material. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 3(3), 254–257.


Article Metrics

#### view : 245 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Ilmi Zajuli Ichsan

International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies (IJEVS)

E-ISSN : 2684-6950