Seminar on research results: the violation of the maxim of quantity produced by the undergraduate students at the english department STKIP YPUP Makassar

Fitriani Fitriani

Abstract


This study aims at analyzing the violation of the maxim of quantity produced by undergraduate students in research seminar and the reason why they violate this kind of maxim. The researchers applied qualitative research design by using observation and in-depth interview. Four undergraduate students were the participants of this research recruiting using purposive random sampling. The results show that most of the participants violated the maxim of quantity by doing circumlocution (not to the point), providing more explanation, and talking too much. They considered that it was valuable for them to provide more information than needed to obtain the attention of the examiners. They assume that the more they speak the good outcome for their research seminar will be accomplished because having more explanation means they master their research content well.


Keywords


Cooperative Principle; Maxim of quantity; Research seminars; Over-description;

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arts, A. (2004). Over specification in instructive texts (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Tilburg University.

Arts, Anja, Maes, A., Noordman, L. G., & Jansen, C. (2011). Over specification in written instruction. Linguistics, 49(3), 555–574.

Belke, E. (2006). Visual determinants of preferred adjective order. Visual Cognition, 14(3), 261–294.

Chairunnisa, N., & Natsir, M. (2014). The violating maxims of main characters in the hangover movie’s script. Linguistica, 3(2). http://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/jalu/article/view/1229

Davies, C., & Katsos, N. (2013). Are speakers and listeners ‘only moderately Gricean’? An empirical response to Engelhardt et al.(2006). Journal of Pragmatics, 49(1), 78–106.

Deutsch, W., & Pechmann, T. (1982). Social interaction and the development of definite descriptions. Cognition, 11(2), 159–184.

Engelhardt, P. E., Bailey, K. G., & Ferreira, F. (2006). Do speakers and listeners observe the Gricean Maxim of Quantity? Journal of Memory and Language, 54(4), 554–573.

Engelhardt, P. E., Demiral, Ş. B., & Ferreira, F. (2011). Over-specified referring expressions impair comprehension: An ERP study. Brain and Cognition, 77(2), 304–314.

Fukumura, K., & van Gompel, R. P. G. (2017). How do violations of Gricean maxims affect reading? Journal of Memory and Language, 95, 1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.008.

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2011). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. Pearson Higher Ed.

Geurts, B., & Rubio-Fernández, P. (2015). Pragmatics and processing. Ratio, 28(4), 446–469.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation’in p. cole and j. morgan (eds.) syntax and semantics volume 3: Speech acts. Academic Press, New York.

Grice, H. Paul. (1975). Logic and conversation’in p. cole and j. morgan (eds.) syntax and semantics volume 3: Speech acts. Academic Press, New York.

Grice, Herbert P. (1970). Logic and conversation. na. Retrieved from https://edge.edx.org/asset-v1:Brown+CSCI2951-K+2015_T2+type@asset+block/grice75.pdf

Grodner, D., & Sedivy, J. C. (2011). 10 The Effect of Speaker-Specific Information on Pragmatic Inferences. In The processing and acquisition of reference . 2327: 239–272. MIT Press.

Huberman, M., & Miles, M. B. (2002). The qualitative researcher’s companion. Sage.

Li, Q. (2016). Conversational Implicature in English Listening Comprehension Teaching. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(10), 2044–2051. doi: 10.17507/tpls.0610.22

Maes, A., Arts, A., & Noordman, L. (2004). Reference management in instructive discourse. Discourse Processes, 37(2), 117–144.

Pechmann, T. (1989). Incremental speech production and referential overspecification. Linguistics, 27(1), 89–110.

Piantadosi, S. T., Tily, H., & Gibson, E. (2012). The communicative function of ambiguity in language. Cognition, 122(3), 280–291.

Risdianto, F. (2016). A conversational implicature analysis in oscar wilde’s short story “happy prince.” Register Journal, 4(2). http://ijims.iainsalatiga.ac.id/index.php/register/article/view/461

Safitri, L. M., Seken, P. D. I. K., MA, Putra, P. D. I. N. A. J., & MA. (2014). Observance and Non-Observance of Gricean Maxims in Instructional Context: An Analysis of EFL Classroom Interaction. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 2(1). http://pasca.undiksha.ac.id/e-journal/index.php/jpbi/article/view/1434

Sedivy, J. C. (2003). Pragmatic versus form-based accounts of referential contrast: Evidence for effects of informativity expectations. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(1), 3–23.

Sedivy, J. C. (2007). Implicature during real time conversation: A view from language processing research. Philosophy Compass, 2(3), 475–496.

Wu, S., & Ma, Z. (2020). How is Chinese reading affected by under-specification and over-specification? Evidence from self-paced reading experiments. Journal of Pragmatics, 155, 213–233. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.11.006




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v3i4.3449

Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 20 times
 PDF Downloaded : 3 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Fitriani Fitriani


International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies (IJEVS)

E-ISSN : 2684-6950