Discourse on Adolescent Deviant Behavior on Social Media Facebook: Indonesian Youth Group Caption
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v2i10.2749Keywords:
Discourse, Deviant Behavior, Facebook, Indonesion Youth Group Caption,Abstract
This study aims to determine the content or discourse of deviant behavior by teenagers on Facebook social media and to find out which vocabulary is most widely used by Indonesian teenage grub caption members. This type of research is qualitative with content analysis methods. The subjects of this study were members of the Indonesian Youth Caption group, while the informants used the internet. Based on the results of the analysis and discussion of the data, it shows that the discourse on deviant behavior by teenagers in the Facebook Social Media Grub is: (1) Sharing pornographic videos in the form of adult films or real videos of teenagers who commit deviations, out of habit, and follow what other grub members do, (2) Share pornographic links that can be accessed by members via YouTube or WhatsApp and vent things they cannot do in their daily life, (3) Share pornographic photos for entertainment, are influenced by uploads fellow members, get audience and attention. Then the vocabulary that is often used by teenagers on the Facebook Social Media Grub, namely: (1) Sange, a sentence for men who already understand the adult world, is often used in everyday life, especially teenage boys, slang, and words. which leads to negative and dirty things, (2) Whatsapp media is used to get videos that are is viral, (3) Chat for women because they are used to seeing uploads made by young women, are interested, and feel bored with male friendships.
References
Barnes, S. B. (2006). A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday. 11(9).
Bosiakoh, T. A., & Paul, K. (2010). Differential association theory and juvenile delinquency in Ghanas capital city-Accra: The case of Ghana borstal institute. International Journal of sociology and Anthropology, 2(9), 198-205.
Budiman, A. (2004). Pengantar Analisis Wacana. Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.
Burgess, R. L., & Akers, R. L. (1966). A differential association-reinforcement theory of criminal behavior. Social problems, 14(2), 128-147.
Chaer, A. (2007). Kajian bahasa: struktur internal, pemakaian, dan pemelajaran. Rineka Cipta.
Cohen, B. J. (2003). Theory and practice of psychiatry. Oxford University Press.
Cormode, G., & Krishnamurthy, B. (2008). Key differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0. First Monday, 13(6).
Darma, Y. A. (2014). Analisis Wacana Kritis dalam Multiperspektif. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.
DeBell, M., & Chapman, C. (2006). Computer and Internet Use by Students in 2003. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2006-065. National Center for Education Statistics.
Dowdell, E. B., Burgess, A. W., & Flores, J. R. (2011). Online social networking patterns among adolescents, young adults, and sexual offenders. AJN The American Journal of Nursing, 111(7), 28-36.
Goodson, I., & Deakin Crick, R. (2009). Curriculum as narration: tales from the children of the colonised. The Curriculum Journal, 20(3), 225-236.
Downs, D. (2005). Pornography. Dalam Microsoft Encarta Reference Library.
Engel, V. J. L. (2012). Upaya Melindungi Anak-anak Dari Fornografi Di Internet. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 11(25), 60-65.
GOODE, W. J. (2020). Family systems and social mobility. Families in East and West: Socialization process and kinship ties, 120.
Greenhow, C., & Robelia, B. (2009). Old communication, new literacies: Social network sites as social learning resources. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 1130-1161.
Gunarsa, S. D. (2004). Bunga rampai psikologi perkembangan dari anak sampai usia lanjut. Jakarta: BPK.
Hidayati, K. B., & Farid, M. (2016). Konsep Diri, Adversity Quotient dan Penyesuaian Diri pada Remaja. Persona: Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia, 5(02).
Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. R. (2017). The distinction between crime and criminality. In The Craft of Criminology (pp. 187-202). Routledge.
Horton, P. B., & Hunt, C. L. (1996). Sosiologi (terjemahan Aminudi Ram dan Tita Sobari). Jakarta: Erlangga.
Jacky, M. (2015). Sosiologi konsep, teori, dan metode. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media.
Johnstone, B. (2017). Discourse analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
Jurgenson, N. (2012). When atoms meet bits: Social media, the mobile web and augmented revolution. Future internet, 4(1), 83-91.
Kartono, K. (2014). Patologi sosial jilid 2: Kenakalan remaja. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Kemp, S. (2018). Digital in 2018: Worlds internet users pass the 4 billion mark. We are social, 30.
Lenhart, A., Arafeh, S., Smith, A., & Macgill, A. R. (2008). Writing, Technology and Teens. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
Li, X. (2009). A Daoist perspective on internationalizing curriculum. Curriculum inquiry, 39(1), 179-192.
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (36th ed.; I. Taufik, Ed.). PT Remaja Rosdakarya, April 2017.
Mulyana, D. (2005). Kajian Wacana: Teori, Metode, dan Aplikasi Prinsip-prinsip Analisis Wacana. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
Mulyasa, E. (2012). Manajemen dan kepemimpinan kepala sekolah. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Narwoko, J. D., & Suyanto, B. (2010). Sosiologi Teks Pengantar dan Terapan Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
Nomor, U. U. R. I. (20). Tahun 2003 tentang sistem pendidikan nasional.
Pescosolido, B. A. (2011). The Sociology of Social Networks, 21st Century Sociology.
O'Keeffe, G. S., & Clarke-Pearson, K. (2011). The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. Pediatrics, 127(4), 800-804.
Rochaniningsih, N. S. (2014). Dampak pergeseran peran dan fungsi keluarga pada perilaku menyimpang remaja. Jurnal Pembangunan Pendidikan: Fondasi dan Aplikasi, 2(1).
Scarpitti, FR., AL Nielsen., & JM Miller. (2009). "A Sociological Theory of Criminal Behavior." Pp. 211 in Crime and Criminals Contemporary and Classic Readings in Criminology (2nd ed.). New York
Social, W. A. (2018). Global digital report 2018. New York: We Are Social.
Staksrud, E., Ólafsson, K., & Livingstone, S. (2013). Does the use of social networking sites increase childrens risk of harm?. Computers in human behavior, 29(1), 40-50.
Sumarlam, M. S. (2003). Teori dan Praktik Analisis Wacana. Pustaka Cakra, Surakarta.
Ybarra, M. L., Diener-West, M., & Leaf, P. J. (2007). Examining the overlap in Internet harassment and school bullying: Implications for school intervention. Journal of Adolescent health, 41(6), S42-S50.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Please find the rights and licenses in International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies (IJEVS)
1. License
The article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2. Authors Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
IJEVS's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, IJEVS permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work. Users will also need to attribute authors and IJEVS on distributing works in the journal.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
- Copyright, and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books,
- The right to self-archive the article,
- the right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
6. Termination
This agreement can be terminated by the author or IJEVS upon two months notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating partys notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of IJEVS.
7. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by IJEVS or its sublicensee.
8. Miscellaneous
IJEVS will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the articles editorial process is successfully completed and IJEVS or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. IJEVS may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers.
