The Effect of Application of Restaurant Laboratory Management System on College Student Service Satisfaction At The Department of Home Economic Education Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Siti Yuliana, Luthfiyah Nurlaela, Sri Handajani, Tri Rijanto

Abstract


The study was aimed to obtain information the effects the application of system the management of lab where internal conditions a restaurant of the results of the learning and of the level of satisfaction study on public service delivery a student on the directions in which their four of family welfare education of engineering faculty Universitas Negeri Surabaya. The results of the hypothesis in this research showing no influence between management systems laboratory restaurant to study results , especially in study results domain cognitive and domain affective students p of culinary of education family welfare Universitas Negeri Surabaya , but results test hypothesis said influential application of the system laboratory management to study results psychomotor domain .The results of the hypothesis said that there was no influence management systems laboratory to satisfaction service .The results of the hypothesis showing no influence between management systems laboratory restaurant of the results of learning and satisfaction students  of culinary of education family welfare Universitas Negeri Surabaya. This research result in line with several theories that supports. Condition services not yet filled in the system this research that led to the absence of the influence of the application of the system of indicators service so an impact on indicators.

Keywords


Laboratory; Learning Outcomes; Service Satisfaction;

References


Ariant, Abizar. (2012). Definisi psikomotor. Discussion, (Online) (http://abazariant.blogspot.com/2012/10/definisi-kognitif-afektif-dan-psikomotor.html, diakses 14 Mei 2014).

Arikunto, Suharsimi. (1998). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek.Jakarta Rineka Cipta

Azhari & Syafiie. (2006). Sistem Politik Indonesia. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Daryanto. (2013). Inovasi Pembelajaran Efektif. Bandung: Yrama Widya.

Hammerling, Julie A. (2012). Best Practices In Undergraduate Clinical Laboratory Science Online Education And Effective Use of Educational Technology Tools, 45(6),313-319. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1309/LMVB30QRE3AIEUXE

Ibrahim, M. (2010). Dasar-Dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Kunandar. (2013). Penilaian Autentik. Grafindo Persada. Depok.

Lestari, Yanti Dwi. (2010). Studi Tentang Makna Upacara Sedekah Bumi Bagi Masyarakat Dusun Kabunan Kelurahan Kebontemu Kecamatan Peterongan Kabupaten Jombang. Skripsi tidak diterbitkan. Surabaya: PKK FT Unesa.

Mohamad Z, Yasin RM, Rahman MNA. (2012). Journal of Education and Learning. Vol.6 (1) 61 pp. 59-64.

Permendikbud. (2014). Laboratorium Pendidikan. Jakarta: Depdikbud.

Permendiknas No 40. (2008). Standart Sarana dan Prasarana SMK. Jakarta: Diknas.

Riswanti, Heny Tri. (2015). Pengaruh Pengelolaan Bengkel TKR Terhadap Pengetahuan, Keterampilan Praktik dan Motivasi Belajar Siswa di SMK Negeri 1 Sambeng. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Surabaya: PPS Unesa.

Rynja, G.M. & D.C. Moy. (2006). Laboratory service evaluation: Laboratory product model and the supply chain. Benchmarking An International Journal. 13(3):324-336.

Sonhadji, Ahmad. (2002). Laboratorium sebagai Basis Pendidikan Teknik di Perguruan Tinggi: Pidato pengukuhan Guru Besar.Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.

Sudjana, Nana. (2010). Penilian Hasil proses belajar mengajar, Bandung: PT Ramajaya Rosdakarya.

Sugiono. (2010). Metode penelitian Kuantitatif kualitatif danR&D. Bandung. Alfabeta.

Suyono, Harianto. (2011). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Surabaya: Rosda.

Tjiptono. (2003). Total Quality manajeman. Andy.Yogyakarta.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v2i4.2533

Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 329 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Siti Yuliana, Luthfiyah Nurlaela, Sri Handajani, Tri Rijanto