Women Language Features Used By Female Judges And Female Contestants In Australian The Next Top Model Episode Session 10: Corpus Driven Approach

Pipit Ertika Daristin, Slamet Setiawan, Ali Mustofa

Abstract


This study was intended to describe women linguistic features used linguistic features used by female in different role, in this case is between judges and contestants in a television show, In Australian The Next Top Model, which show power and solidarity. The aims of this study are to find out what linguistic features of women used by female judges and female contestants in a competition show and to determine which role is more powerful and show more solidarity. It is shown that the female judges and the female contestants In Australian the Next Top Model Session 10 from episode 1 to 10 are on the two first features which are put on the most rank of used. Those features are lexical hedges and Intensifiers which have the highest frequency used of the female judges and the female contestants. And the other result that the elements of women’s language features influence the context found In Australian the Next Top Model Session 10 are Lexical Hedges or Filler, Empty Adjectives, Intensifiers, Avoidance of Strong Swear Word, Softening Remark and Acceptable Reason, Tag Question, and Super Polite For. The use of these language features depend on the context that is influenced by power and solidarity, dominant and inequality of the status uttered by the speaker of the female judges and the contestants. And then, total Women’s language features used by the female judges 162 while total Women’s language features used by Female contestants 327.

Keywords


Gender; Language Feature; Women’s language feature; Power and solidarity;

References


Amandara, D. (2014). Male and Female Representation in the Grimm's Fairy Tales: a corpus-driven approach. Surabaya: Universitas Airlangga.

Coates, J. (2004). Women, Men, and Language: A Sociolinguistic Account of Gender Differences in Language. London: Longman.

Conrad, S. (2002). Corpus Linguistic Approach for Discourse Analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics : Longman.

Creswell, J. (2003). Research Design: qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methodology. California: Sage Publication.

Crystal, C. (2008). Gender Stereotypes:An analysis of popular films and TV. The Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media, 12-23.

Diana, N. W. (2015). WOMEN LINGUISTIC FEATURES USED BY FEMALE JUDGES. Surabaya: Universitas Airlangga.

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Science: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Eckert, P., Mc Connell-Ginet. (2003). Language and Gender. New York: Caambridge University Press.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London and New York: Longman.

Hanum, D. (2012). A Corpus- Based Analysis on the Typical Nouns and Verbs Used in the Health Section of Men's Health Magazine and Women's Health Magazine. Surabaya: Airlangga University.

Hedenmalm, L. (2012). Language and Gender in Disney: A Study of Male and Female Language in Walt Disney Movies. Lulea: Lulea University of Technology.

Holmes, J. (2008). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Third Edition. London: Pearson Education Limited.

Lakoff, R. (2004). language Gender and Politics Putting "Women" and " Power" in the Same Sentence, In J Holmes, Mm. Meyerholff (Eds). The Handbook of Language and Gender (pp. 161- 178). United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

McConnell-Ginet, S. &. (2003). Language and gender. . Cambridge University Press.

McEnery, T. H. (2012). Corpus Linguistics. United States: Cambridge University Press.

Newman, M. L. (2008). Gender Differences in Language Use: An Analysis of 14000 Text Samples. Routledge Taylor& Francis Group. 211-236.

Pebrianti, A. A. (2013). Women’s Language Features Used by Indonesian Female Bloggers. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Savitri, R. D. (2012). An Analysis of Women Linguistic Features in Legally Blonde. Surabaya: Universitas Airlangga.

Schleppegrell, M. J. (2001). Linguistic features of the language of schooling. Linguistics and education 12(4), 431-459.

Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. England: Oxford University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v2i5.2506

Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 453 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Pipit Ertika Daristin, Slamet Setiawan, Ali Mustofa


International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies (IJEVS)

E-ISSN : 2684-6950