Mathematical Reasoning Ability and Learning Independence of High School Students Through Problem Based Learning Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v1i3.1596Keywords:
Problem Based Learning Model, Mathematical Reasoning, Student Learning Independence,Abstract
The ability of students to answer mathematical reasoning questions and to learn independence is still low. Mathematical reasoning and learning independence are important possessed by students. Therefore, a learning model of a relevant. One of the learning approaches is the Problem Based Learning (PBL) model. The purpose of the study to find out: Differences in the increase in mathematical reasoning abilities and student learning independence taught by using PBL with students taught with conventional learning in terms of (a) all students, and (b) student level (high, medium, low). This research is an experimental research design with a pretest-posttest control group design. The population of this study was all students of class X of the Delima 1 High School in Pidie. While the sample consisted of two classes, namely the experimental class (X-2) and the control class (X-3) taken by random sampling. The instrument used to obtain research data is a test of mathematical reasoning ability and student learning independence. To see the difference in mathematical reasoning abilities and student learning independence between classes PBL models with conventional classes using the t-test. The results showed that the improvement of students' mathematical reasoning abilities and student learning independence that obtained learning with PBL approach was better than students who obtained learning with conventional approach in terms of overall and initial abilities of students (high, medium, low), in quality there were significant differences between students who studied using PBL model with those using conventional learning.References
Ali, M, & Asrori, M. (2010). Psikologi remaja. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Amir, M.T. (2010). Inovasi pendidikan melalui problem based learning. Jakarta: Kencana Prenanda Media Group.
Arends, R.I. (2010). Learning to teach seventh edition. New York: The McGraw Hill Companies.
Arikunto, S. (2012). Prosedur penelitian : suatu pendekatan praktik. (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.
Arikunto, S. (2003). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Ario, M. (2015). Penalaran matematis dan mathematical habits of mind melalui pembelajaran berbasis masalah dan penemuan terbimbing. Edusentris, Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 2(1), 34-46.
Bieda, K. N., Ji, X., Drwencke, J., & Picard, A. (2014). Reasoning-and-proving opportunities in elementary mathematics textbooks. International Journal of Educational Research, 64, 71-80.
Depdiknas. (2012). KBBI pusat bahasa. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Gallagher, S (2015). Doing the math: calculating the role of evolution and enculturation in the origins of geometrical and mathematical reasoning. [versi elektronik]. Journal for Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 119, 341-346.
Mahardiyanti, T. (2014). Penerapan metode pembelajaran problem based learning (pbl) untuk meningkatkan kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa. Journal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 2(2), 142-149.
Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 In-ternastional result in mathema-tics. chestnut hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College
NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Novak, V. (2010). Reasoning about mathematical fuzzylogic and its future. [versi elektronik]. Journal of Fuzzy Sets and System,19(2), 25-44.
Rizqi,N.R., & Surya,E. (2017). An analysis of students mathematical reasoning ability in viii grade of sabilina tembung junior high school. International Journal Of Advance Research And Innovative Ideas In Education (IJARIIE), 3(2).
Rusman.(2012). Model-model pembelajaran. Depok: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Savery, J.R, & Duffy, T.M. (2001). Problem based learning: An Introduction model and its Constructivist framework. [versi elektronik]. Journal CRLT Technical Report, 16(1), 1-17.
Slameto. (2010). Belajar dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Sudjana, N. (2011). Dasar-dasar proses belajar mengajar. Bandung : Sinar Baru Algensindo.
Sugandi, A.I (2013). Pengaruh pembelajaran berbasis masalah dengan setting kooperatif jigsaw terhadap kemandirian belajar siswa SMA. Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Matematika STKIP Siliwangi Bandung, 2 (2),3-5
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan r&d. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suharti, A. (2013). Improvement of power mathmatical in learning math through learning model combined. International Journal of Science and Technology. 2(8), 576-582.
Suherman. (2003). Strategi pembelajaran matematika kontemporer. Bandung: JICA-IMSTEP Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Sumarmo, U. (2010). Kemandirian belajar : apa, mengapa, dan bagaimana, dikembangkan pada peserta didik. Bandung: FMIPA UPI.
Sumartini, T.S. (2015). Peningkatan kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa melalui pembelajaran berbasis masalah. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1),1-4.
Sundayana. (2010). Statistika penelitian pendidikan. STKIP Garut Press.
Suprijono, A. 2010. Cooperative learning. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Turmudi. (2008). Landasan filosofis dan teoritis pembelajaran matematika (berparadigma exploratif dan investigatif). Jakarta: Lauser Cita Pustaka.
Uyanto. (2009). Pedoman analisis data dengan spss. Jakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Wena, M. (2009). Strategi pembelajaran inovatif kontemporer. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Yasmin, M. (2011). Desain pembelajaran berbasis tingkat satuan pendidikan. Jakarta: Gaung Persada.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Please find the rights and licenses in International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies (IJEVS)
1. License
The article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2. Authors Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
IJEVS's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, IJEVS permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work. Users will also need to attribute authors and IJEVS on distributing works in the journal.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
- Copyright, and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books,
- The right to self-archive the article,
- the right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
6. Termination
This agreement can be terminated by the author or IJEVS upon two months notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating partys notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of IJEVS.
7. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by IJEVS or its sublicensee.
8. Miscellaneous
IJEVS will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the articles editorial process is successfully completed and IJEVS or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. IJEVS may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers.
