The Application of Problem Solving Reasoning (PSR) in Improving Students Metacognitive at the Twelfth Grade Students of SMAN 19 Makassar

Authors

  • Sujarwo Sujarwo Universitas Megarezky, Jl.Antang Raya No.45, Makassar, 90234.
  • Akhiruddin Akhiruddin Universitas Megarezky, Jl.Antang Raya No.45, Makassar, 90234.
  • Muh. Reski Salemuddin Universitas Megarezky, Jl.Antang Raya No.45, Makassar, 90234.
  • Bellona Mardhatillah Sabillah Universitas Megarezky, Jl.Antang Raya No.45, Makassar, 90234.
  • Sriwahyuni Sriwahyuni Universitas Megarezky, Jl.Antang Raya No.45, Makassar, 90234.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v1i2.1525

Keywords:

Problem solving reasoning, Students metacognitive,

Abstract

The study describes the students thinking skill, and metacognitive in problem solving reasoning (PSR) learning model at SMAN 19 Makassar in the academic year 2018/2019. The design of this research was Classroom Action Research (CAR) in which subject was students social science eleventh grade students that consisted of 69 students. Data were collected by using a problem-solving reasoning tests in the form of multiple choice, essay, oral and practice tests. Data of problem solving reasoning (PSR) abilities were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. The results of this study show that: (1) The application of problem solving reasoning (PSR) can improve the statistical students metacognitive of social science eleventh grade students. In cycle I, the students English outcomes average reached 59.2, whereas in cycle II was successfully increased into 84.8, In cycle I, the students sociology and anthropology outcomes average reached 60.9, whereas in cycle II was successfully increased into 88.5 and in cycle I, the students Art and Culture outcomes average reached 62.3, whereas in cycle II was successfully increased into 86.9. (2) The application of problem solving reasoning (PSR) can improve students' metacognitive of social science XI grade students. These results indicate that there has been an increasing in percentage mastery learning by 20% from cycle I to cycle II.

References

Adhitama, R. S., Kusnadi, K., & Supriatno, B. (2014). Kesadaran metakognitif siswa dalam pembelajaran berbasis proyek pada pokok bahasan pencemaran lingkungan. ASIMILASI, I (1), 2-11.

Arikunto, et al. (2006). Classroom Action Research. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Dunbar K, and Fugelsang J 2006 Problem Solving and Reasoning Appear in E.E. Smith & S.Kosslyn an introduction to cognitive psychology http://www.utsc.utoronto.ca/

Foshay, R. & Kirkley, J. (2003). Principles for Teaching Problem Solving. Tersedia: www.plato.com/downloads/papers/paper_04.pdf diakses tanggal 15 December 2018.

Harrison, G. M., & Vallin, L. M. (2017). Evaluating the metacognitive awareness inventory using empirical factor-structure evidence. Metacognition and Learning, 1- 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-017-9176-z

Jacobsen D A, Eggen P, and Kauchak D 2009 Methods for Teaching (Terj A Fawaid & C. Anam.Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar).

Jagals, D., & Walt, M. Van Der. (2016). Enabling metacognitive skills for mathematics problem solving: A collective case study of metacognitive reflection and awareness. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(2), 154-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2016.11 92239.

Kallio, H., Virta, K., & Kallio, M. (2018). Modelling the components of metacognitive awareness. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 7(2),94-122. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2018.2789.

Kunandar. (2011). Langkah Mudah Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: PT. Rajawali Pers.

Munir, N. P. (2016). Pengaruh kesadaran metakognitif terhadap motivasi belajar dan kaitannya dengan hasil belajarn matematika siswa kelas XI SMA Negeri di Kota Pare-Pare. Al-Khwarizmi: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan ALam, 4(2), 117-128.

Murni. (2013). Open-Ended Approach in Learning to Improve Students Thinking Skills in Banda Aceh.International Jurnal of Independent Research and studies-IJIRS. Vol. 2, No. 2 (April, 2013) 95-101.

Nasution, M. Y., & Rezeqi, S. (2015). Application of contextual learning to improve critical thinking ability of students in biology teaching and learning strategies class. International Journal ofLearning, Teaching and Educational Research, 11(3), 109-116.

Sanjaya, W 2006 Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan (Jakarta: Kencana).

Santyasa. I. W. (2005). Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Dalam Implementasi Kurikulum. Tersedia pada: http://www.freewebs.com diakses pada tanggal 5 January 2019.

Shoimin A 2014 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013 (Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media).

Sugiyono. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R & amp; D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tanner, K. D. (2012). Promoting student metacognition. CBE Life Sciences Education, 11(2), 113-120. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0033

Downloads

Published

2019-06-30

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019): June 2019

Section

Articles

License

Please find the rights and licenses in International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies (IJEVS)

1. License

The article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

2. Authors Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).

3. User Rights

IJEVS's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, IJEVS permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work. Users will also need to attribute authors and IJEVS on distributing works in the journal.

4. Rights of Authors

Authors retain the following rights:

  • Copyright, and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
  • The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books,
  • The right to self-archive the article,
  • the right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies).

5. Co-Authorship

If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.

6. Termination

This agreement can be terminated by the author or IJEVS upon two months notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating partys notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of IJEVS. 

7. Royalties

This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by IJEVS or its sublicensee.

8. Miscellaneous

IJEVS will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the articles editorial process is successfully completed and IJEVS or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. IJEVS may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers.