Collaboration of Educational Actors in Formulating Integrated Curriculum Based on Islamic Values in Aceh

Nur Hafni, Aiyub Aiyub

Abstract


The Province of Aceh has a robust legal basis and umbrella in implementing an education system based on Islamic values following the mandate of Law No. 11 of 2006 and is described in the provincial and district qanuns of North Aceh. Implementing the special autonomy policy in education gives the Aceh Provincial government the flexibility to develop creative and innovative Islamic-based programs following the characteristics of Aceh's privileges. This study aims to analyze the formulation of Islamic values-based curriculum education policies in primary education and the collaborative actors involved in forming Islamic values-based educational curriculum policies. The research was used the descriptive qualitative method. The informants were determined by purposive sampling. The study found no synergy of cross-actor in collaborative governance in the formulation of Islamic values-based Aceh education curriculum policies. Thus, the implementation of education programs based on Islamic values was interpreted and meant differently among agencies. In addition, the National Curriculum strongly dominated the implementation of Aceh education in primary education, while local policies on Islamic values were few. Therefore, the policies of providing education do not reflect the specificity of Aceh's privileges. Besides that, the Islamic-based education policy program was not explained in a more detailed derivative policy.


Keywords


collaborative; governance; formulation; actors; islamic education curriculum;

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ansell, C& Gash.A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory . 18 (4),543-57.https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum 032,

Anderson, James, 1975. Public Policy Making (second edition, New York: Holt Rencart and Winston.

Booher.D.E.& Innes, J.E.(2002)Network Power in Collaborative planning Journal of planning education and research. 21(3) .221-236. https://doi.urg/10.1177/0739456X0202100301

Bradley.Q (2012). A” Performative”Social Movement: The Emergence ofCollective Contention within Collaborative Governance. Space and Polity.16 (2) 215 -232. https://doi.org/10/1080/13562576.2012.721504

Baska.B. (2012). The Paradigms of Public Administration Re-Examined: A Reflection Journal of Public Administration.47(1).23-67

Dwiyanto, A. (2003). Kependudukan dan Kebijakan UGM. Reformasi Tata-Pemerintahan di Indonesia. Pusat Studi

Dwiyanto, A. (2011). Penilaian Kinerja Organisasi Pelayanan Publik. UGM.

Dwiyanto, A. (2018). Mencari Identitas Ilmu Administrasi Publik di Indonesia, Gadjah Mada University Press.

Ewalt, J. A. G. (2001). Theories of Governance and New Public Management: Links to Understanding Welfare Policy Implementation. Igarss 2001, 1, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2

Gibson, R. (2011). A Primer on Collaborative Multi-Level Governance. In Canadian Regional Development: A Critical Review of Theory, Practice, and Potentials.

Goldsmith, S., & Kettl, D. F. (2009). Networks, The Key to Networked Government Government Unlocking The Power of Network. The Kay to Networking governance.

Henry, N., 2007. Public administration and Public Affairs. Sixth Edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice-Hall.

Ikeanyibe, O. M. (2016). Uniformity in Local Government System and the Governance Model in Nigeria. 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909616666105 Journal of Asian and African Studies, 53(1).

Jones, Charles O., 1984. An Introduction to the Study of Public Policy (Third Edt.) Monterey Brooks/ Cole Publishing Company,

Salamon, L. M., & Lund, M. S. (1989). Beyond Privatization: The Tools of Government Action. Urban Institute Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=BXI2nGfivJQC

Schöttle, A., Haghsheno, S., & Gehbauer, F. (2014). Defining Cooperation and Collaboration in the Context of Lean Construction.Proceedings IGLC-22, 1269–1280.

Seigler, D. (2011). Renewing Democracy by Engaging Citizens in Shared Governance. Public Administration Review, 71(6), 968–970. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02452.x

Suwitri Sri. Jurnal Delegasi, Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi, STIA Banjarmasin, Vol. VI No. 3, Januari 2008, Terakreditasi KepDirjenDikti No. 56/ DIKTI/ KEP/ 2005).

Subarsono, 2008. Analisis Kebijakan Publik, Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar.

Sudarmo. (2015). Menuju Model Resolusi Konflik Berbasis Governance: Memuat Pengalaman Penelitian Lapangan tentang Isu Pedagang Kaki Lima Dan Konflik Antar Kelompok. Sebelas Maret University Press.

Tamayao, M. J. M. (2014). what is governance? Law, Politics and Philosophy. https://tamayaosbc.wordpress.com/2014/08/21/what-is-governance

Phares, D. (2004). Metropolitan Governance Without Metropolitan Government? Ashgate.

Yin Robert K.(2006). Studi Kasus ; Desain & Metode. PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2006 tentang Pemerintah Aceh.

Qanun Aceh Utara No 4 tahun 2012 Tentang penyelenggaraan pendidikan Serambi Indonesia Dana Otsus Menurut UU Jumat, 14 Agustus 2015 14: 14.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29103/mspr.v2i1.4975

Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 257 times
 PDF Downloaded : 13 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Nur Hafni, Aiyub Aiyub

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.