Local Open Government: Key Issues in Paris

Syed Agung Afandi, Muslim Afandi, Rizki Erdayani

Abstract


This study aims to analyze key issues of open government in Paris. The city is one of the selected members of the Open Government Partnership (OGP) for the Local Government Pilot Program. A qualitative approach and bibliometric analysis method are used in this study. Data sourced from Google Scholar collected using Publish or Perish (keywords: Paris information access; Paris transparency; Paris public participation; and Paris public collaboration). Data selection using Mendelay, while bibliometric maps obtained using VOSviewer. This study found 90 relevant articles and 90 topics of open government in Paris. The dominant topics include: transparency; Paris agreement; information; guidelines; and access. While the current and potential topics include: communications; challenges; capacity; policy-making; and hidden-order procedure. Since its main role in the Open Government Partnership, Paris has set twelve commitments, four of which are their current focus: Paris citizens’ assembly; introducing two brand-new digital platforms for greater transparency and citizen participation; European citizenship; developing the first index to assess ecological democracy, and establish an action to implement the UNFCCC Action for Climate Empowerment program. These commitments are part of the current potential study of open government in Paris.


Keywords


Key issues; Open government; Paris

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afandi, S. A. (2024). Local Open Government: Strategi Reformasi Administrasi Publik. Depok: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Afandi, S. A., Afandi, M., & Erdayani, R. (2023). Local Open Government: Studies in West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. Jurnal Administrative Reform, 11(2), 85–98.

Afandi, S. A., Erdayani, R., & Afandi, M. (2023). Open Government: A Bibliographic Study of The Semarang and Gwangju Experiences. Jurnal Dinamika Pemerintahan, 6(2), 217–234.

Afandi, S. A., Erdayani, R., & Afandi, M. (2024). Open Parliament: Study from Indonesia and Philippines. Journal of Governance and Social Policy, 5(1), 126–147.

De Blasio, E., & Selva, D. (2019). Implementing open government: a qualitative comparative analysis of digital platforms in France, Italy and United Kingdom. Quality and Quantity, 53(2), 871–896.

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to Conduct a Bibliometric Analysis: An Overview and Guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133(1), 285–296.

Gao, Y., Janssen, M., & Zhang, C. (2021). Understanding the evolution of open government data research: towards open data sustainability and smartness. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 89(1), 59–75.

Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigó, J. M., & Baier-Fuentes, H. (2019). Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140(12), 194–220.

Gil-Garcia, J. R., Gasco-Hernandez, M., & Pardo, T. A. (2020). Beyond Transparency, Participation, and Collaboration? A Reflection on the Dimensions of Open Government. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(3), 483–502.

Ham, J., Koo, Y., & Lee, J. N. (2019). Provision and Usage of Open Government Data: Strategic Transformation Paths. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 119(8), 1841–1858.

Ingrams, A. (2020). Administrative Reform and the Quest for Openness: A Popperian Review of Open Government. Administration and Society, 52(2), 319–340.

Ingrams, A., Piotrowski, S., & Berliner, D. (2020). Learning from Our Mistakes: Public Management Reform and the Hope of Open Government. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 3(4), 257–272.

Irfan, M., Septiadi, Y., Rivandra, M. A., & Rakhmawati, N. A. (2023). Analisis Bibliometrik Publikasi tentang ChatGPT. Journal Information Engineering and Educational Technology, 7(2), 92–97.

Kulsum, U., Nurmandi, A., Isnaini, Muallidin, Jafar, M., Loilatu, & Kurniawan, D. (2022). A Bibliometric Analysis of Open Government: Study on Indonesia and Philippines. Journal of Governance, 7(1), 133–143.

Lnenicka, M., & Saxena, S. (2021). Re-Defining Open Government Data Standards for Smart Cities’ Websites: A Case Study of Selected Cities. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 23(4), 398–411.

Moon, M. J. (2020). Shifting from Old Open Government to New Open Government: Four Critical Dimensions and Case Illustrations. Public Performance and Management Review, 43(3), 535–559.

Moral-Muñoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., Santisteban-Espejo, A., & Cobo, M. J. (2020). Software Tools for Conducting Bibliometric Analysis in Science: An Up-to-date Review. Multidisciplinar, 29(1), 629–635.

Ruijer, E., Détienne, F., Baker, M., Groff, J., & Meijer, A. J. (2020). The Politics of Open Government Data: Understanding Organizational Responses to Pressure for More Transparency. The American Review of Public Administration, 50(3), 156–172.

Ruijer, E., & Meijer, A. (2020). Open Government Data as an Innovation Process: Lessons from a Living Lab Experiment. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(3), 613–635.

Schmidthuber, L., & Hilgers, D. (2021). Trajectories of local open government: An empirical investigation of managerial and political perceptions. International Public Management Journal, 24(4), 537–561.

Tai, K.-T. (2021). Open government research over a decade: A systematic review. Government Information Quarterly, 38(2).

Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Sch, M. R. (2019). Open government and citizen participation: an empirical analysis of citizen expectancy towards open government data. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(3), 566–586.

Zulfa, R. G., & Afandi, S. A. (2023). Analisis Open Government Pada Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kota Pekanbaru. Jurnal Indragiri Penelitian Multidisiplin, 3(2), 57–62.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29103/mspr.v5i2.17772

Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 18 times
 PDF Downloaded : 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Syed Agung Afandi, Muslim Afandi, Rizki Erdayani

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.