Subjective Well-Being of Chinese Residents in Lhokseumawe: A Demographic Analysis Based on Gender and Education

Dewi Rahayu, Nur Afni Safarina

Abstract


Subjective well-being is one of the essential indicators in assessing an individual's quality of life. The Chinese ethnic group, as a minority in Indonesia, faces various social and cultural challenges that may affect their subjective well-being. This study aims to examine differences in the subjective well-being of Chinese residents in Lhokseumawe based on gender and educational level. The research method used a quantitative approach with a comparative research design. The sample consisted of 96 respondents selected using the incidental sampling technique. The research instrument was the "Subjective Well-being" questionnaire developed by Diener and Tov, measuring life satisfaction, positive affect, and negative affect. Data analysis was conducted using the Mann-Whitney U Test to compare groups based on gender and educational level. The results showed significant differences in subjective well-being based on these two variables. Women had higher subjective well-being than men, while individuals with higher education levels exhibited better subjective well-being than those with only a high school education. The findings confirm that demographic factors play a role in subjective well-being, highlighting the need for more targeted interventions to enhance minority well-being. The implications of this study can serve as a foundation for developing programs to improve the subjective well-being of the Chinese community in Lhokseumawe. Further research is recommended to expand the geographical scope and employ a longitudinal approach to understand changes in subjective well-being over time.

Keywords


Chinese ethnic group, education level, gender, subjective well-being

Full Text:

PDF

References


Diener, M. L. & McGavran, M. B. D. (2008). What makes people happy? A developmental

approach to the literature on family relationship and well-being. New York London: The

Gulford Press. 3347-368. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-00541-017

Diener, E. (2009). Assesing Well-Being. Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg. Doi 10. 1007/978-90-

-2354-4.

Diener Ed. (2010). Positive psychology: Differences in well-being. Oxford University.

https://books.google.co.id/books?id=R77hWl1gaQsC&lpg=PR7&ots=EWqEaFjLxY&dq

Diener, E. (2005). Guidelines for National Indicators of Subjective Well Being and Ill-Being.

DOI:10.1007/s11482-006-9007-x

Howell, R. T., & Howell, J. C. (2008). The relation of economic status well-being in developing

countries: A meta-analysis. Psychological Relition. 134(4), 536-560. Doi. 10.1037/00332909.134.4.536.

Hapsari, D. (2015). Idealisme kwe tek hoay tentang sistem pendidikan berbasis budaya Tionghoa dalam cerita pendek “Rumah seolah yang saya impikan”. Jurnal Metasastra. 8

(1), 1-16. https://scholar.archive.org/work/c47ckoowdbgh3aat6ad2p22vum/access/wayback

Eddington, N. & Shuman, R. (2005). Subjective well-being (happiness). Continuing

Psychological Education. https://www.texcpe.com/pdf/fl/2019/FLSWB.pdf




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29103/jpt.v7i1.14712

Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 9 times
 PDF Downloaded : 3 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Dewi Rahayu

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.