Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditor Terhadap Pelunasan Piutang Dari Harta Pailit
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29103/jimfh.v1i1.2541Abstract
The concept of legal protection in bankruptcy has so far been seen as a way out of the problem of accounts receivable debt which coincides with a bankrupt debtor, where the debtor no longer has the ability to repay the debts which are past due to their creditors, so that the steps to submit a request for the determination of bankruptcy status by the Court Commerce of the debtor is a possible step to resolve the bankruptcy case. Bankruptcy was originally regulated in Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (UUK and PKPU). Furthermore, if the parties submitting bankruptcy applications, the Commercial Court Judges at the District Court are required to examine and hear the case being submitted. The research method used is the normative legal research method or library research with the statute aprroach approach and the case aprroach approach. Based on the results of the study, it is known that the form of legal protection for creditors against paying off debts from bankrupt assets in the Supreme Court Decision Number 511 / K / Pdt. Yinchenindo Mining Industry (in bankruptcy) by law becomes a guarantee for its debts to preferred creditors, in this case the Head of the Second Foreign Capital Investment Service Tax Office. Furthermore, the UUK and PKPU also guarantee the rights of creditors in bankruptcy, especially the rights of preferred creditors who have a special position with peace efforts and the postponement of obligations to pay debts of bankrupt debtors to their creditors as stipulated in Article 222 of the UUK and PKPU. The concept of the distribution of bankrupt assets distributed to preferred creditors after deducting bankruptcy fees and compensation for curatorial services where the payment process is settled based on the principle of fairness and balance set forth in Article 265 of the UUK and PKPU, where the preferred creditor parties receive the remaining payment of the receivables amounting to 62.5% ( sixty two point five percent) of the bankruptcy assets.It is expected that the Judges of the Commercial Court and the Court of Appeals at the Supreme Court consider the rights of preferred creditors who pay off their receivables first. The Debtor should be able to immediately submit a request to postpone the debt payment obligation so that the remaining outstanding debt receivables cannot be paid off to the preferred creditors through the sale of free assets. Keywords: Protections of the law, creditor, Treasures of starcDownloads
References
Abdul R. Saliman, 2014, Hukum Bisnis Untuk Perusahaan, Kencana, Jakarta. Ahmad Yani, dan Gunawan Widjaja, 2004, Kepailitan, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta. Bagus Irawan, 2007, Aspek-Aspek Hukum Kepailitan Perusahaan Dan Asuransi, Alumni, Bandung. Bagus Irawan, 2007, Aspek-Aspek Hukum Kepailitan, dan Asuransi, Alumni, Bandung. Burhan Ashofa, 2001, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Rineka Cipta, Cetakan Ketiga. Jakarta. Burhan Bungin, 2007, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Aktualisasi Metodologi Ke Arah Ragam Varian Kontemporer, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, 2015, Buku Panduan Tugas Akhir, Unimal Press, Lhokseumawe. Imran Nating, 2004, Peranan Dan Tanggung Jawab Kurator Dalam Pengurusan dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta. Jono, 2013, Hukum Kepailitan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta. Kartini Muljadi, 2004, Kredior Preferens dan Kreditor Separatis Dalam Kepailitan, UndangUndang Kepailitan dan Perkembangannya: Prosiding Rangkaian Lokarya terbatas Masalah-Masalah Kepailitan dan Wawasan Hukum Bisnis Lainnya, Jakarta. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Khairandy, 2002, Perlindungan Dalam Undang-Undang Kepailitan, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, Jakarta. Muhammad Hadi Subhan, 2008, Hukum Kepailitan Prinsip, Norma, dan Praktik di Peradilan, Kencana, Jakarta. Man Suparman Sastrawidjaja, 2006, Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran utang, Sofmedia, Bandung. Mohammad Chidir Ali, 1995, Kepailitan dan Penundaan Pembayaran, Mandar Maju, Bandung. Munir Fuady, 2002, Hukum Pailit Dalam Teori dan Praktek, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung. Nanda Narendra Putra, Pengertian Utang, Kreditor, dan Debitor dalam KePailitan, http://nandoxodnan.blogspot.co.id/2013/09/pengertian-utang-Kreditor-dan-Debitor.html. Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2008, Penelitian Hukum, Kencana, Jakarta. R. Suyatin, 1983, Hukum Dagang I dan II, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta. Rahayu Hartini, 2007, Hukum Kepailitan, UM Press, Bandung. Ricardo Simanjuntak, 2002, Rancangan Perubahan Undang-Undang Kepailitan dalam Perspektif Pengacara (Komentar Terhadap Perubahan Undang-Undang Kepailitan), Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, Http://Www.Academia.Edu/31144303/Eksistensi_Pengadilan_Niaga_Dan_Perkembangan nya_Dalam_Era_Globalisasi. Ronny Hanitijo, 2004, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta. Ropauan Rambe, Sandar Profesi Kurator dan Pengurus Indonesia, http://KreditorPailit.wordpres.com/standar-kurator-pengurus-indonesia/.
Soejono, dan Abdurrahman, 2003, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta. Sri Redjeki Slamet, 2016, Perlindungan Hukum Dan Kedudukan Kreditor Separatis Dalam Hal Terjadinya KePailitan Terhadap Debitor, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta. Sunarmi, 2010, Hukum Kepailitan, Sofmedia, Jakarta. Sutan Remy Sjahdeini, 2010, Hukum Kepailitan; Memahami Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan, Pustaka Utama Grafiti, Jakarta. Titik Tejaningsih, 2016, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Keditor Separatis Dalam Pengurusan Dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit, FH UII Press, Yogyakarta. Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan. Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Zainal Asikin, 2013, Hukum Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Di Indonesia, Pustaka Reka Cipta, Bandung.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication and this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
All articles in this journal may be disseminated by listing valid sources and the title of the article should not be omitted. The content of the article is liable to the author.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
In the dissemination of articles, the author must declare the JURNAL ILMIAH MAHASISWA FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS MALIKUSSALEH as the first party to publish the article.
