PENGGANTIAN BIAYA KEPADA SAKSI ATAU AHLI DALAM RANGKA MEMBERIKAN KETERANGAN DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA (Studi Penelitian di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Takengon)

Lisa Purba Hajini Purba, Sumiadi S, Yusrizal Y

Abstract


Summons of witnesses at each level of criminal case examination has consequences for the cost of attending the summons. So far, the provisions regarding the cost of summoning witnaesses and experts have been regulated in Article 229 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Law Number 13 of 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims and Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning Procedures for Protection of Witnesses and Victims in Human rights violations, however, in reality the fees that have been regulated in the law are not fully provided to all witnesses and even if there are costs they are not up to standard and not optimal. These costs include accommodation costs, consumption costs, transportation costs and costs of reimbursing lost income due to having to attend calls. The purpose of this research is to find out and explain the compensation mechanism to witnesses or experts in order to differentiate information in the criminal justice system in the jurisdiction of the Takengon District Court and what are the obstacles in reimbursing costs to witnesses or experts in order to provide information in the criminal justice system in the region. the law of the Takengon District Court. This type of research is juridical empirical, that is, approaching the problem through legal research by looking at the prevailing legal norms and relating them to the facts that exist in society in connection with the problems encountered in the research.

Keywords


Reimbursement, Witness or Expert, Criminal Justice System

Full Text:

PDF

References


Chazawi, Adami. 2006. Hukum PembuktianTindak Pidana Korupsi, Alumni, Bandung.

Faal, M. 1987. Penyaringan Perkara Pidana Oleh Polisi (Diskresi Kepolisian). Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta.

Hamzah, Andi. 1996. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Sapta Artha Jaya, Jakarta.

……………. . 2006. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Harahap, M. Yahya. 2002. Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

………………… . 2004. Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, Penyidikan dan Penuntutan, Edisi Kedua, Sinar Grafika.

Karim, A. Nasution. 1976. Masalah Hukum Pembuktian dalam Proses Pidana, I, Papas Sinar Sinanti, Jakarta.

Marpaung, Leden. 1997. Proses Tuntutan Ganti Kerugian Dan Rehabilitasi Dalam Hukum Pidana, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

M, Marwan dan Jimmy. 2009. Kamus Hukum, Reality Publisher, Surabaya.

Muhadar. 2009. Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana, ITS. Press, Surabaya.

Pohan, Agustinus dan Topo Santoso, 2012. Hukum Pidana Dalam Perspektif, Pustaka Larasan, Denpasar.

Poerwadarminta, W.J.S. 1976. Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia, Balai Pustaka, Jakarta.

Prakoso, Djoko. 2003. Alat Bukti dan Kekuatan Pembuktian di Dalam Proses Pidana, Liberty, Yogyakarta.

Pradjodikoro, Wiryono. 1977. Hukum Acara Pidana, Sumur, Bandung.

Reksodiputro, Marjdono. 1993. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia (Melihat Kepada Kejatan Dan Penegakan Hukum Dalam Batas - Batas Toleransi), Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.

Soemitro, Ronny Hanitijo. 1998. Metode Penelitian Hukum dan Jumetri, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.

Suggono, Bambang. 2000. Metode Penelitian Hukum, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Soekanto, Soerjono. 1984. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, UI Press, Jakarta.

Tanusubroto, S. 1989. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Acara Pidana Cetakan 2, armico, bandung.

Zulkarnain, 2013. Praktik Peradilan Pidana, Setara Pres, Indonesia.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29103/reusam.v8i2.3865

Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 204 times
 PDF Downloaded : 18 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Lisa Purba Hajini Purba, Sumiadi S, Yusrizal Y


REUSAM: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum

P-ISSN : 2338-4735

E-ISSN : 2722-5100