Model Sinergilitas through Triple Helix Competitive Advantage Of SMEs In Samosir

Nurafrina Siregar, Irawan Irawan


This research aims to find out the effect of the synergy model of Triple Helix on Competitive Advantage. This research uses the SEM-Partial Least Square (PLS) approach, which is a component-based or variant-based structural equation model. Hypothesis testing is done using the Bootstrap method with a minimum number of bootstraps as much as 217. The results of this study prove that Academic Collaboration has a positive and significant effect on Competitive Advantage which proves the hypothesis is accepted. This means that the better academic collaboration that can be implemented, the higher the creation of Competitive Advantage. The test results provide empirical evidence that Industry Collaboration had a positive and insignificant effect on Competitive Advantage which proved the hypothesis was rejected. Surely these findings show how Industry Collaboration cannot affect Competitive Advantage so SMEs are expected to evaluate better Industry Collaboration. The test results provide empirical evidence that Government Collaboration has a positive and significant effect on Competitive Advantage which proves the hypothesis is accepted. Surely these findings show how Government Collaboration can affect Competitive Advantage so that SMEs are expected to be able to take advantage of support from the government so that Competitive Advantage can be improved.



Sinergility, Triple Helix, Competitive Advantage and SMEs

Full Text:



Aliqah, K. M. A. (2012). Differentiation and organizational performance: Empirical evidence from Jordanian companies. Journal of Economics, 3(1), 7-11.

Biggs, T., & Shah, M. K. (2006). African SMES, networks, and manufacturing performance. Journal of banking & Finance, 30(11), 3043-3066.

Bronto, S., Asmoro, P., Hartono, G., & Sulistiyono, S. (2012). Evolution of rajabasa volcano in Kalianda area and its vicinity, South Lampung Regency. Indonesian Journal on Geoscience, 7(1), 11-25.

Belderbos, R., Carree, M., Diederen, B., Lokshin, B., & Veugelers, R. (2004). Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies. International journal of industrial organization, 22(8-9), 1237-1263.

Campbell, J., Kümpel, H. J., Fabian, M., Fischer, D., Görres, B., Keysers, C. J., & Lehmann, K. (2002). Recent movement pattern of the Lower Rhine Embayment from tilt, gravity and GPS data. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, 81(2), 223-230.

Chenhall, R. H., & Langfield-Smith, K. (1998). The relationship between strategic priorities, management techniques and management accounting: an empirical investigation using a systems approach. Accounting, organizations and society, 23(3), 243-264.

Dzisah, J., & Etzkowitz, H. (2008). Triple helix circulation: the heart of innovation and development. International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 7(2), 101-115.

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research policy, 29(2), 109-123.

Fritsch, M., & Franke, G. (2004). Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers and R&D cooperation. Research policy, 33(2), 245-255.

Hamidizadeh, M. R., & Taheri, M. (2013). A comprehensive literature review in competitive advantages of businesses. Asian Journal of Research in Marketing, 2(6), 76-97.

Jha, A. K., & Bose, I. (2018). Supplying Innovation?: Investigating Impact of Suppliers on Innovation in IT Firms.

Hewitt-Dundas, N. (2006). Resource and capability constraints to innovation in small and large plants. Small Business Economics, 26(3), 257-277.

Lambing, P., & Kuehl, C. R. (2000). Entrepreneurship. Prentice Hall. 336p. ISBN, 13, 9780132281744.

Nakwa, K., Zawdie, G., & Intarakumnerd, P. (2012). Role of intermediaries in accelerating the transformation of inter-firm networks into triple helix networks: A case study of sme-based industries in Thailand. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 52, 52-61.

Nieto, M. J., & Santamaría, L. (2007). The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation. Technovation, 27(6-7), 367-377.

Porter, M. E. (1996). Competitive advantage, agglomeration economies, and regional policy. International regional science review, 19(1-2), 85-90.

Praswati, A. N. (2017). Perkembangan model helix dalam peningkatan inovasi. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Riset Manajemen & Bisnis.

Xie, X. M., Zeng, S. X., & Tam, C. M. (2010). Overcoming barriers to innovation in SMEs in China: A perspective based cooperation network. Innovation, 12(3), 298-310.

Razak, A. A., & Saad, M. (2007). The role of universities in the evolution of the Triple Helix culture of innovation network: The case of Malaysia. International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 6(3), 211-225.

Singh, V., Vaibhav, S. and Sharma, S.K. (2018), “Using structural equation modelling to assess the

sustainable competitive advantages provided by the low-cost carrier model”, Journal of Indian Business Research.

Sigalas, C. and Pekka Economou, V. (2013), “Revisiting the concept of competitive advantage: problems and fallacies arising from its conceptualization”, Journal of Strategy and Management, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 61-80.

Zuberbier, T., Aberer, W., Asero, R., Abdul Latiff, A. H., Baker, D., Ballmer‐Weber, B., ... & Maurer, M. (2018). The EAACI/GA²LEN/EDF/WAO guideline for the definition, classification, diagnosis and management of urticaria. Allergy, 73(7), 1393-1414


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 125 times
 PDF Downloaded : 60 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 Nurafrina Siregar, Irawan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.