Gambaran Social Loafing Pada Pengurus Organisasi Himpunan Mahasiswa Psikologi
Abstract
This study aims to describe the dimensions and factors of social loafing carried out by the Psychology Student Association administrators. The method used is descriptive qualitative with interviews and observations involving nine people. The data analysis technique used is the Creswell technique by means of theme analysis and then interpreting the findings in the field. The results of this study indicate that the dimensions of the dilution effect and immediacy gap as well as forms of social loafing carried out by organizational management are not carrying out the tasks assigned to the organization, they do not want to try new jobdesk other than what they usually carry out, they do not provide ideas within the organization and only follow ideas that are given by other members, there is a lack of mutual acquaintance between members, there are problems that occur in the organization, between members are unable to coordinate and communicate when carrying out tasks or activities, lack of concern for other members so that they allow other members not to carry out their responsibilities. Factors that affect social loafing, such as attribution and equality, target regulation is not optimal, contingency is not balanced, group evaluation, group cohesion, distribution of fairness, individual collectivity of co-workers performance, achievement motivation, group size and individual conflict.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Audi, Nanda Lukita. 2014. “Persahabatan Dan Toleransi Pemalasan Sosial Pada Mahasiswa Psikologi Universitas Sumatera Utara.” Psikologia: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Psikologi 9(2).
Budio, Sesra. 2018. “Komunikasi Organisasi: Konsep Dasar Organisasi.” Jurnal Menata: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam 1(2):32–50.
Carron, Albert V, Shauna M. Burke, and Harry Prapavessis. 2010. “Journal of Applied Sport Psychology Self-Presentation and Group Influence.” (March 2015):37–41. doi: 10.1080/10413200490260044.
Clark, Jill, and Trish Baker. 2011. “‘ It’s Not Fair!’ Cultural Attitudes to Social Loafing in Ethnically Diverse Groups.” Intercultural Communication Studies 20(1).
Hadijaya, Yusuf. 2015. “Organisasi Kemahasiswaan Dan Kompetensi Manajerial Mahasiswa.”
Hakim, Anggina Rahmi. 2018. “Hubungan Komitmen Organisasi Dengan Social Loafing Pada Pengurus Organisasi X Di Fakultas Syariáh Dan Hukum.” UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.
Karau, Steven J., and Kipling D. Williams. 1993. “Social Loafing: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65(4):681.
Kerr, Norbert L. 1983. “Motivation Losses in Small Groups: A Social Dilemma Analysis.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45(4):819.
Latane, Bibb, Kipling Williams, and Stephen Harkins. 1979. “Many Hands Make Light the Work : The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing.” 37(6):822–32.
Liden, Robert C., Sandy J. Wayne, Renata A. Jaworski, and Nathan Bennett. 2004. “Social Loafing: A Field Investigation.” Journal of Management 30(2):285–304.
Oktrivia, Ranti Jihan, and Effy Wardati Maryam. 2021. “Social Loafing On Students Of Muhammadiyah University Sidoarjo.” Academia Open 5:10–21070.
Purba, Regina A. S., and Rika Eliana. 2018. “Hubungan Self-Efficacy Dan Social Loafing Tendency Pada Mahasiswa.” Pp. 258–63 in Talenta Conference Series: Local Wisdom, Social, and Arts (LWSA). Vol. 1.
Riyanto, Theo, and Martinus Th. 2008. Kelompok Kerja Yang Efektif. Kanisius.
Strom, Paris S., Robert D. Strom, and Elsie G. Moore. 1999. “Peer and Self-Evaluation of Teamwork Skills.” Journal of Adolescence 22(4):539–53.
Sugiyono, P. D. 2019. “Metode Penelitian Pendekatan Kuantitatif.” Penerbit CV. Alfabeta: Bandung.
Webb, Noreen M. 1997. “Assessing Students in Small Collaborative Groups.” Theory into Practice 36(4):205–13.
Wildanto, Eri, and Wiwien Dinar Pratisti. 2016. “Social Loafing Pada Anggota Organisasi Mahasiswa Fakultas Psikologi UMS.” Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Williams, Kipling, Stephen G. Harkins, and Bibb Latané. 1981. “Identifiability as a Deterrant to Social Loafing: Two Cheering Experiments.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40(2):303–11. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.40.2.303.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2910/insight.v1i4.11329
Article Metrics
Abstract Views : 256 timesPDF Downloaded : 72 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Ukhailiyah Afifah Damanik, Cut Ita Zahara, Safuwan Safuwan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.