Implementation of the Uninhabitable House Social Rehabilitation Program
Abstract
Implementation of the Uninhabitable House Social Rehabilitation Program (RSRTLH). In its performance, several problems were found. First, there are large numbers of individuals without adequate housing. In addition, the distribution of beneficiaries of the RS-RTLH program has not been fully optimal, and the construction and renovation of houses have not been completed. This study aims to examine and describe the Uninhabitable House Rehabilitation Program implementation. In implementing the program delivered by Merilee S. Grindle, the tone of the program is appropriate, and the program objectives have been achieved. The research method uses a qualitative approach. The research results show that the program's implementation has not reached its target, indicating that the performance has not been by the observed impacts, and the level of change has not been running optimally as stated in the regulations that have been set. The inhibiting factors include the lack of involvement of related parties, budget constraints, and lack of community participation, so the program's implementation aims to be completed but has not yet obtained maximum results.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (1997). Qualitative research for education. Allyn & Bacon Boston, MA.
Edward, george I. (1980). Implementing Public Policy. Congressional Quarterly Press.
Grindle, M. S. (2017). Politics and policy implementation in the Third World (Vol. 5159). Princeton University Press.
Horowitz, D. L. (2010). The courts and social policy. Brookings Institution Press.
Nazaruddin. (2021). The Implementation Electronic Application E-Musrenbang Towards Local Development Planning in Lhokseumawe, Indonesia. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210125.054
Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2005). Realist review-a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10(1_suppl), 21β34.
Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1984). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland; Or, why itβs amazing that federal programs work at all, this being a saga of the Economic Development Administration as told by two sympathetic observers who seek to build morals (Vol. 708). Univ of California Press.
Ripley, R. B., & Franklin, G. A. (1986). Policy implementation and bureaucracy. Brooks/Cole.
Smith, T. B. (1973). The policy implementation process. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 197β209. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01405732
Sutton, R. (1999). The policy process: an overview. Overseas Development Institute London.
Tachjan, H. (2006). Implementasi Kebijakan Publik (D. Mariana & C. Paskarina (eds.); Cetakan 1). Asosiasi Ilmu Politik Indonesia (AIPI) Bandung.
Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The policy implementation process: A conceptual framework. Administration & Society, 6(4), 445β488.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29103/ijpas.v3i1.12330
Article Metrics
Abstract Views : 318 timesPDF Downloaded : 41 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Milli Milli, Nazaruddin Nazaruddin, Teuku Alfiady, Muklir Muklir
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
e-ISSN 2807-3169
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Address: Kampus Bukit Indah jln Sumatera nomor 8 Kecamatan Muara Satu, Kota Lhokseumawe, tlp. 0645 44450/ 08116818083 fax 0645 44450 ISSN: