AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE PHENOMENON OF GLOSSINESS IN CONTEMPORARY ARCHITECTURE

Atthaillah Badruddin

Abstract


This paper will investigate the phenomenon of glossiness as a rising trend in contemporary architecture. Also,
this paper will argue a significant transition in the surface finishing and socio-technical development has
directed architecture toward the trend of glossiness. To gain a better understanding toward this particular
phenomenon, the exploration within this study will be discussed in two parts. First, we will look at glossiness as
material quality and the limitation of perception. This will suggest the glossiness as a result of the interaction
between the known material qualities, such as transparency, reflectivity and opacity. Next, we will further look
at this particular phenomenon in socio-technical development in the 20th century to understand why the
glossiness has present in the contemporary architecture. Consequently, this understanding will bring us to the
comprehension of glossiness as a product of consumerism culture and computer innovation in architecture
surface materiality.

Keywords


Glossiness, glossy, sheen

Full Text:

PDF

References


Addington, Michelle., Daniel Schodek. Smart materials and new technologies. Oxford :Elsevier, 2005.

Blau, Eve. “Transparency and the irreconcilable contradictions of modernity.” Praxis 9(2007): 50-59.

Benjamin, Andrew. “Surface effects: Borromini, Semper, Loos.” The journal of architecture 11:1 (2006): 1-36.

Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction : a social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984.

Chase, John,. “The role of consumerism in American architecture.” Journal of architectural education 44 (1991): 211-224.

Collins, Peter. Changing ideals in modern architecture 1750-1950. London: Faber and Faber, 1965.

Deplazes, Andrea., Constructin Architecture: materials, processes, structures. Basel: Birkhauser, 2008.

Dovey, Kim. “Place.” Framing places: mediating power in built form. New York :Routledge, 2008.

Frampton, Kenneth. Studies in tectonic culture. Cambridge: MIT press, 1995.

Frascari, Marco. “Semiotica ab Edendo, Taste in Architecture.” in Eating Architecture, edited by Jamie Horwitz and Paulette Singley, 191-203. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2004.

Frascari, Marco. “The lume materiale in the architecture of Venice.” Perspecta 24 (1988): 136-145.

Hays, K. Micheal. “The envelope as mediator.” In The state of architecture at the beginning of the 21st century, edited by Bernard Tschumi and Irene Cheng, 66-67. New York :Monacelli Press, 2003.

Hays, K. Micheal. “Desire.” Architecture’s desire: reading the late avant-garde. Cambridge:MIT press, 2010.

Heidegger, Martin. Basic writings from Being and time (1927) to The task of thinking (1964). New York : Harper & Row, 1977.

Hodgson, P. Hagen and Rolf Toyka. The architect, the cooks and the good taste. Basel :Birkhäuser, 2007.

Holl, Steven, Juhani Pallasmaa and Alberto Perez Gomez. Questions of perception: phenomenology of architecture. San Fransisco: William Stout, 2006.

Bechir and Yasser Elsheshtawy. “The Ambiguous Veil: On Transparency, the Mashrabiy'ya, and Architecture.” The journal of architectural education 56 (2003): 17-25.

La Marche, Jean. “The space of the surface.” Environment and planning 33 (2001): 2205 2218.

Leatherbarrow, David. The root of architectural invention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

Leatherbarrow, David and Mohsen Mostafavi. Surface architecture. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2002.

Leatherbarrow, David and Mohsen Mostafavi.On weathering: the life of a building in time. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1993.

Leatherbarrow, David and Mohsen Mostafavi. “On weathering: a new surface out of the tracks of time.” Daidalos 43 (1992): 116-123.

Lee, W. Gerald. “Heidegger and modern architecture.” PhD diss., University

of Pennsylvania, 1993.

Lefteri, Chris. Metals: Materials for inspirational design. Sussex: RotoVision, 2004.

Lynn, Greg.”Blob.” Journal of philosophy and the visual arts (1995): 158-168.

Mack, Gerhard. Art museums into the 21st century. Basel: Birkhauser, 1999. Norberg-Schulz, Christian. “Place?.” Genius loci: Toward phenomenology of architecture. New York : Rizolli, 1974.

Otero-Pailos, Jorge. “Christian NorbergSchulz: the genesis of genius loci and its formulation as alecheic image.” Theorizing the anti-avant-garde: invocation of phenomenology in architectural discourse, 1945-1989. PhD diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2002. JURNAL ARSITEKNO VOL. II JULI 2013 : 25-40 40

Pallasmaa, Juhani. The eyes of the skin: architecture and the senses.

hichester: Wiley Academy, 2005.

Rowe, Colin and Robert Slutzsky. “Transparency: literal and phenomenal.” Perspecta 8 (1963): 45- 54.

Sadler, Simon. Archigram architecture without architecture. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2005.

Seamon, David. “A way of seeing people and place: Phenomenology in environment-behavior research.” Theoretical Perspectives in Environment-Behavior Research

(2000): 157-178.

Sharr, Adam. Heidegger for Architects. New York: Routledge, 2007.

Simmels, Georg. “The problem of style.” Theory, culture & Society 8 (1991): 63-71.

Taylor, Mark. “Surface-talk.” Architectural design: surface consciousness 73 (2003): 30-35.

Tschumi, Bernard. “Vectors and envelopes.” In The state of architecture at the beginning of the 21st century, edited by Bernard Tschumi and Irene Cheng, 64-65. New York :Monacelli Press, 2003.

Waters, John K. Blobitecture: waveform architecture and digital design. Massachusetts: Rockport publisher, 2003.

Weston, Richard. Materials, form and architectur. London:Laurence King, 2003.

Woods, Lebbeus. “Drawn into Space: Zaha Hadid.” Architectural design 78 (2008): 28-35.

Zizek, Slavoj. “Introduction.” Enjoy your symptom! : Jacques Lacan in Hollywood and out. New York: Routledge, 2001.

Websites:

Arcspace. “Spacelab Cook-Fournier Kunsthaus Graz.” Accessed October 10, 2011http://www.arcspace.com/archite cts/cook/

Austrian National Tourist Office. “Kunsthaus Graz.” Accessed November 22, 2011

http://www.austria.info/au/culturearts/kunsthaus-graz-1140943.html

Farnsworthhouse. “Farnsworth House.” Accessed October 3, 2011. http://www.farnsworthhouse.org/phot os.htm

Rogers, Stirk, Habour + Partners. “Lloyd’s of London.” Accessed October 8, 2011 http://www.richardrogers.co.uk/work/ all_projects/lloyd_s_of_london/comple ted

Zaha-hadid. “Nordpark railway station, zahahadid.” Accessed September 20, 2011. http://www.zahahadid.com/architectu re/nordpark-railway-stations/




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29103/arj.v2i2.1241

Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 320 times
 PDF Downloaded : 17 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Atthaillah Badruddin

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



Indexed in:

Crossref logo  Portal Garuda   Google Scholar      Dimension

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Published by:
Architecture Program
Universitas Malikussaleh