ANALISIS METODE FUZZY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (FAHP) DALAM MENENTUKAN POSISI JABATAN

Authors

  • Marischa Elveny STTH
  • Rahmad Syah STTH

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29103/techsi.v6i1.166

Abstract

This study aims to determine positions with many criteria . In determining positions often appear the probability of every possible improper, because of the many factors that influence the assessment of existing options . In the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) obtained uncertainty assessment is too subjective for qualitative data. Problems in determining the positions can be solved by Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP ), which uses valuation in the interval , so that qualitative data can provide a more objective assessment. The criteria used in this study is obedience, performance, responsibility, honesty, cooperation and leadership with three alternatives A, B and C. Based on this research can be concluded, performance becomes the highest criterion weighs 6.95 priority, then the priority weight 6.76 obedience, responsibility weighs 6.63 priority , honesty with weights 6.27 priorities , cooperation with priority weight 6.12 and the latter 's leadership with priority weights 6.2 . While the preferred alternative, Alternative C to get the highest score with 21.65 weight which is an alternative to the two weights B with 21.44 and the last alternative A 20.25 by weight

References

Chang, D. Y. (1996). Applications of The Extent Analysis Method on Fuzzy AHP. European Jurnal of Operational Research, 95, 649-655.

Figueira, J., Greco, S. & Ehrgott,M. (2005). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. Print ©2005 Springer Science Business Media, Inc. ISBN: 0-387-23067-X.

Hartono, Hidayat, A. & Dwi, H.J.U. (2013). Bentuk KerjaSama Public-Private Pembangunan Graving Dock dan Manajemen Galangan Kapal Dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchi Process (AHP).Vol. 34 No.1, ISSN 0852-1697.

Kong, F. & Liu, H. (2005), Applying Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process To

Evaluate Success Factors Of E-Commerce. Internasional Journal of

Information And Systems Vol 1, Number 3-4, Page 406-412. Institute For Scientific Computing And Information.

Kopytov, E. & Abramov, D. (2012). Multiple-Criteria Analysis And Choice Of Transportation Alternatives In Multimodal Freight Transport System.

Transport and Telecommunication, 2012, Volume 13, No 2, 148-158.

Kusumadewi Sri, Hartati S, Harjoko A, Wardoyo R. (2006). Fuzzy Multi

Attribute Decision Making (Fuzzy MADM). Graha Ilmu. Yogyakarta.

Moengin, P. (2013). Model AHP/DEA Untuk Mengukur Efisiensi

Penggunaan Teknologi Gas Buang Rumah Tangga Ramah

Lingkungan. Vol VIII, No 1

Shega, H.N.H., Rahmawati, R. & Yasin, H. (2012). Penentuan faktor prioritas mahasiswa dalam memilih telepon seluler merk

blackberry dengan fuzzy AHP. Jurnal Gaussian, Volume 1, Nomor

, Tahun 2012, Halaman 73-82.

Syamsuddin, I. & Hwang, J .(2009). The Application of AHP Model to Guide Decision Makers: A Case Study of E-Banking Security.

Fourth International Conference on Computer Sciences and

Convergence Information Technology.

Ramdhani,M.A. (2001). Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kriteria Majemuk Pada Pengambilan Keputusan Kelompok. Disertasi Doktor Departemen Teknik Industri ITB.Bandung.

Saaty, Thomas L. (1988). Multicriteria Decision Making - The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Typeset in GreT Britain by Eta Service Typesetters) Ltd. Beccles Sufflolk Printed and Bound in the United States America.

Saaty,Thomas L. (1980). Analytic Hierarchy Process. Mc Graw hill : New York. (2001), Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback : The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications :Pittsburgh,PA.

Saaty Thomas.L (1990). How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European journal of operational research 48 (1990) 9-26 NorthHolland.

Witjaksono, A.W (2009). Perancangan Sistem Pengukuran Kinerja Di Apotik XYZ Dengan Menggunakan Metode Integrated Performance Asurement Systems (IPMS) Dan Pembobotan Triangular Fuzzy AHP. Fakultas Teknik Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta

Zeki, A. G & Ozdemir,R.G. (2006). A Fuzzy AHP Approach To Evaluating

Machine Tool Alternatives. Received: July 2004 / Accepted: August

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Downloads

Published

2014-04-14

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2014)

Section

Articles

License

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication and this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this journal.

All articles in this journal may be disseminated by listing valid sources and the title of the article should not be omitted. The content of the article is liable to the author.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

In the dissemination of articles by the author must declare the TECHSI Journal as the first party to publish the article.