DISPARITAS PENJATUHAN PIDANA DALAM PERKARA PENCURIAN DENGAN PEMBERATAN DI PENGADILAN NEGERI TAKENGON (Studi Putusan Nomor 79/Pid.B/2022/PN.Tkn, Nomor 33/Pid.B/2022/PN.Tkn dan Nomor 13/Pid.B/2022/PN.Tkn)

Authors

  • Arafah - Arafah Pengadilan Negeri Takengon, Aceh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29103/sjp.v13i1.20849

Keywords:

Disparity, Criminal Sentences, Aggravated Theft

Abstract

Disparity in criminal sentences is basically a phenomenon that often occurs in criminal law enforcement efforts. Disparity is the application of unequal punishment to the same crime (Same Offence) or to crimes whose dangerous nature can be compared (Offences of Comparable Seriousness) without a clear justification. Disparity in sentencing can be found in many cases, one of which occurred at the Takengon District Court in Decision Number 79/Pid.B/2022/PN.Tkn, Number 33/Pid.B/2022/PN.Tkn and Number 13/Pid.B/2022/PN.Tkn. This research is an empirical legal research with a case approach that examines court decisions. The data sources in this study consist of two forms, namely primary data sources obtained from interviews with respondents and informants. In addition, it also uses secondary data sources which are divided into three legal materials, namely primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The data collected was then analyzed using qualitative data analysis techniques. The results of this study found that the occurrence of disparity in sentencing in Decision Number 79/Pid.B/2022/PN.Tkn, Decision Number 33/Pid.B/2022/PN.Tkn and Decision Number 13/Pid.B/2022/PN.Tkn, occurred due to several things including 1) the factor of the judge's freedom in assessing. 2) The factor of differences in aggravating and mitigating circumstances between the three cases. 3) The factor of differences in the consequences caused by the perpetrators in the three cases. The disparity in sentencing in aggravated theft cases, especially in Decision Number 79/Pid.B/2022/PN.Tkn, Decision Number 33/Pid.B/2022/PN.Tkn and Decision Number 13/Pid.B/2022/PN.Tkn is something that is permissible and common. The disparity in these three cases was formed automatically because each case has its own legal facts which are different from each other

References

Buku

Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, Panduan Penulisan Tugas Akhir Skripsi, 2016.

Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief, Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana, Edisi Pertama Cetakan Ke-4, Bandung: PT Alumni, 2010.

Radbruch, Gustav, Tujuan Hukum, Terj. Sidharta, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta, 2012.

Rahardjo, Satjipto, Ilmu Hukum, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2012.

Santoso, M. Agus, Hukum, Moral & Keadilan Sebuah Kajian Filsafat Hukum, Ctk. Kedua, Jakarta, Kencana, 2014.

Suteki dan Galang Taufani, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum (Filsafat, Teori dan Praktik), Depok, RajaGrafindo Persada, 2020.

Handoko, Duwi, Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia, Pekanbaru: Hawa dan Ahwa, 2015.

Jurnal

Fachri, Moch, Keadilan dalam Perspektif Agama dan Filsafat Moral, Jurnal Hakam, Vol. 02 No. 02, 2018.

Gulo, Nimerodi dan Ade Kurniawan Muharram, Disparitas dalam Penjatuhan Pidana, Jurnal Masalah-masalah Hukum, Vol, 47 No. 3, 2018.

Idrus, Nur Fadhillah Al, Disparitas Putusan Pemidanaan Perkara Penipuan Online, Jurnal Yudisial, Vol. 16 No. 3, 2023.

Wijaya, Rosa Septa, Husni, Herinawati, Disparitas Pidana Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan pada Perkara Pidana Cepat Kasus Pelanggaran Lalu Lintas (Studi Penelitian di Pengadilan Negeri Kelas I B Lhokseumawe), Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa (JIM-FH), Vol. 6 No. 2, 2023.

Yusmadi, Faktor Terjadinya Disparitas Terhadap Penjatuhan Sanksi Pidana, Jurnal Tahqiqa, Vol. 18 No. 1, 2024.

Perundang-undangan

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana

Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Mengenai Kekuasaan Kehakiman Pasal 5.

Putusan Pengadilan

Putusan Nomor 79/Pid.B/2022/PN.Tkn

Putusan Nomor 33/Pid.B/2022/PN.Tkn

Putusan Nomor 13/Pid.B/2022/PN.Tkn

Downloads

Published

2025-05-19

How to Cite

Arafah, A. .-. (2025). DISPARITAS PENJATUHAN PIDANA DALAM PERKARA PENCURIAN DENGAN PEMBERATAN DI PENGADILAN NEGERI TAKENGON (Studi Putusan Nomor 79/Pid.B/2022/PN.Tkn, Nomor 33/Pid.B/2022/PN.Tkn dan Nomor 13/Pid.B/2022/PN.Tkn). Suloh: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, 13(1), 276–290. https://doi.org/10.29103/sjp.v13i1.20849

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025): Suloh: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, April 2025

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 arafah - arafah, jamaluddin - jamaluddin, budi - bahreisy

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication and this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this journal.

All articles in this journal may be disseminated by listing valid sources and the title of the article should not be omitted. The content of the article is liable to the author.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

In the dissemination of articles by the author must declare the Suloh:Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh as the first party to publish the article.