PERBANDINGAN KETATANEGARAAN INDONESIA DAN INGGRIS DARI BERBAGAI ASPEK (COMPARISON OF INDONESIAN AND ENGLAND CONSTITUTIONS FROM VARIOUS ASPECTS)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29103/reusam.v10i2.10440Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to find out the differences in various aspects of state administration between Indonesia and England.
Research methodology: The research methodology used in this study is normative juridical with a comparative law approach.
Results: After comparing the Indonesian and England state administrations from various aspects briefly in this study, conclusions are obtained based on the compared aspects of various aspects, namely the legal system, form of state, form of government, system of government, form of constitution and legislative structure.
Limitations: This research was only carried out through a literature study without directly seeing, feeling and conducting empirical studies between Indonesia and England in practice, so that the limitations of this research are clear in detail. Researchers hope that in the future a direct comparative study between the two countries will be carried out in order to produce more comprehensive research. Contribution: This research is expected to be a reference in constitutional law research in Indonesia, especially in this case is the comparison of constitutional law between Indonesia and England.
References
A.Barlian, A. E. dan A. D. P. H. (2021). PEMBANGUNAN SISTEM HUKUM INDONESIA BERDASARKAN NILAI - NILAI PANCASILA SEBAGAI IDEOLOGI POLITIK BANGSA. Jurnal Kajian Lembaga Ketahanan Nasional Republik Indonesia, 9(1), 556. http://jurnal.lemhannas.go.id/index.php/jkl/article/view/208/117
Al-Fatih, F. A. dan S. (2017). PERBANDINGAN SISTEM HUKUM COMMON LAW, CIVIL LAW DAN ISLAMIC LAW DALAM PERSPEKTIF SEJARAH DAN KARAKTERISTIK BERPIKIR. Legality, 25(1), 104-105. https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/legality/article/download/5993/5504/15962
Ali, A. (2017). Menguak Teori Hukum dan Teori Peradilan. PT Kharisma Putra Utama.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2002). Konsolidasi Nasakah UUD 1945 Setelah Perubahan Keempat. Pusat Studi Hukum Fakultas Hukum UI.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2007). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. PT BHUANA ILMU POPULER.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2014). Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Baker, J. H. (2002). An Introduction to English Legal History.
Boa, F. Y. (2018). Pancasila sebagai Sumber Hukum dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional. Jurnal Konstitusi, 15(1), 28.
C.F Storng. (2018). Konstitusi-Konstitusi Politik Modern. Penerbit Nusa Media.
Cruz, P. de. (2010). Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Common Law, Civil Law, and Socialist Law. Nusa Media.
Dickey, A. . (2015). Pengantar Studi Hukum Konstitusi. Penerbit Nusamedia.
Eriton, M. (2021). Perbandingan hukum tata Negara. Universitas Jambi. http://eriton.staff.unja.ac.id/2021/02/16/perbandingan-hukum-tata-negara/
Et.al, D. P. N. (2017). Mengamandemen Ketentuan Yang Tidak Dapat Diamandemen Dalam Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Thafa Media.
Franky Butar-Butar, Hilda Yunita Sabrie, E. I. D. (Ed.). (2017). KONFERENSI NASIONAL ASOSIASI DOSEN PENGAJAR HUKUM PERBANDINGAN INDONESIA (ADPHI). In Perbandingan Hukum Dan Perkembangan Sistem Hukum : Konvergensi atau Divergensi (p. 4). Fakultas Hukum Universitar Airlangga.
Hartono, G. (2019). PERBANDINGAN HUKUM PERSEROAN TERBATAS DI INDONESIA DENGAN INGGRIS. Al Qodiri: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial Dan Keagamaan, 17(2). http://repository.ubaya.ac.id/36601/1/Gunawan Hartono_Perbandingan Hukum Perseroan Terbatas.pdf
Hartono, S. (1991). Politik Hukum Menuju Satu Sistem Hukum Nasional. Alumni.
Hendarmin Ranadireksa. (2009). Visi Bernegara Arsitektur Konstitusi Demokratik. FOKUSMEDIA.
Huda, N. (2015). Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Mahmuzar. (2020). MODEL NEGARA KESATUAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA DI ERA REFORMASI. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 50(2), 303. http://jhp.ui.ac.id/index.php/home/article/view/2590/1601
Martosoewignyo, S. S. (1984). Pengantar Perbandingan Antar Hukum Tata Negara. Rajawali.
Melatyugra, N. (2018). PERJANJIAN INTERNASIONAL DALAM HUKUM NASIONAL: PERBANDINGAN PRAKTIK NEGARA INDONESIA, INGGRIS, DAN AFRIKA SELATAN. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(2). https://ejournal.uksw.edu/refleksihukum/article/view/1984
Michael Bogdan. (2010). Pengantar Perbandingan Sistem Hukum. Penerbit Nusa Media.
Mustaghfirin, H. (2011). Sistem Hukum Barat, Sistem Hukum Adat, Dan Sistem Hukum Islam Menuju Sebagai Sistem Hukum Nasional Sebuah Ide Yang Harmoni. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 11(Edisi Khusus Februari), 92.
PRAMATO, R. (2018). KOMPARASI KONSEP HUKUM DELIK TERHADAP AGAMA DALAM KUHP INDONESIA PERBANDINGAN DENGN INGGRIS [Universitas Andalas]. http://scholar.unand.ac.id/32180/
Putra, A. F. K. (2014). Konstruksi Hukum Atas Kepentingan Umum Dan Ganti Rugi Dalam Pengadaan Tanah (Studi Perbandingan Hukum Tanah Indonesia Dan Hukum Tanah Inggris) [Universitas Negeri Surakarta]. https://digilib.uns.ac.id/dokumen/detail/36657
RAHMATIKA, S. A. (2018). BATASAN UMUR ANAK TERKAIT DENGAN PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA (Studi Komparasi Hukum Pidana Indonesia dengan Inggris) [UNIVERSITAS ANDALAS PADANG]. http://scholar.unand.ac.id/37330/
Rani, E. F. dan N. P. (2015). Hukum Tata Negara. Genta Publishing.
RIBERU, K. (2021). PERBANDINGAN HUKUM PIDANA INDONESIA DAN HUKUM PIDANA INGGRIS DALAM PENGATURAN TINDAK PIDANA PEMERKOSAAN (STUDI KASUS REYNHART SINAGA). E-JOURNAL FATWA HUKUM FACULTY OF LAW UNIVERSITAS TANJUNGPURA, 4(1). https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jfh/article/view/44633
Riyanto, A. (2009). Teori Konstitusi. Penerbit YAPEMDO.
Salam, D. S. (2002). Manajemen Pemerintahan Indonesia. Djambatan.
Sautunnida, L. (2018). URGENSI UNDANG-UNDANG PERLINDUNGAN DATA PRIBADI DI INDONESIA; STUDI PERBANDINGAN HUKUM INGGRIS DAN MALAYSIA. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 20(2). http://e-repository.unsyiah.ac.id/kanun/article/download/11159/9202
Sembiring, R. A. (2019). Perbandingan Hukum Tindak Pidana Terorisme Proses Deradikalisasi di Indonesia dan Inggris Tahun 2003-2018 [Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya]. http://repository.ubharajaya.ac.id/2218/
Shidiq, M. K. (2018). Perbandingan hukum penerapan doktrin mitigasi dan asas itikad baik terkait hukum perjanjian dalam hukum perdata Indonesia dengan hukum Jepang, hukum Prancis dan hukum Inggris [Universitas Indonesia]. https://lontar.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20466425&lokasi=lokal
Sodik, H. J. R. dan A. (2010). Tokoh-tokoh Ahli Pikir Negara dan Hukum. Penerbit Nuansa.
Soemardi, D. (1997). Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. Indhillco.
Soeroso. (2007). Perbandingan Hukum Perdata. Sinar Grafika.
Sudding, S. (2014). Perselingkuhan Hukum dan Politik Dalam Negara Demokrasi. Rangkang Education.
Sulaiman, K. F. (2017a). Teori Hukum Konstitusi. Penerbit Nusa Media.
Sulaiman, K. F. (2017b). Teori Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dan Aspek Pengujiannya. Thafa Media.
Tufani, S. dan G. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Wati, B. A. S. dan A. (2016). Perbandingan Hukum Tata Negara. CV PUSTAKA SETIA.
WHERE, K. (2015). Konstitusi-konstitusi Modern. Penerbit Nusa Media.
Yulistyaputri, Z. F. A. dan R. (2019). ROMANTISME SISTEM HUKUM DI INDONESIA : KAJIAN ATAS KONSTRIBUSI HUKUM ADAT DAN HUKUM ISLAM TERHADAP PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA. Jurnal RechtsVinding, 8(1), 38.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Please find the rights and licenses in REUSAM: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Legal Studies).
1. License
The article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2. Authors Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
REUSAM: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Legal Studies)'s spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, REUSAM permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work. Users will also need to attribute authors and REUSAM on distributing works in the journal.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
- Copyright, and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books,
- The right to self-archive the article,
- the right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (REUSAM).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
6. Termination
This agreement can be terminated by the author or REUSAM upon two months notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating partys notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of REUSAM.
7. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by REUSAM or its sublicensee.
8. Miscellaneous
REUSAM will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the articles editorial process is successfully completed and REUSAM or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. REUSAM may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers.
