THE PRECARIOUS SYSTEM IN GIG POLITICAL ECONOMY:  A STUDY OF THE VULNERABILITY OF ONLINE DRIVERS IN INDONESIA

Nanda Rizka Syafriani Nasution; Sarah Novianti; Nur Inayah Yushar

doi:10.29103/mspr.v6i2.24664

Authors

Nanda Rizka Syafriani Nasution Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
Sarah Novianti Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
Nur Inayah Yushar Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29103/mspr.v6i2.24664

Keywords:

Economy, Indonesia, Vulnerability, Online, Drivers

Abstract

This study is based on the rise of the gig economy in Indonesia, particularly in the online transportation sector, which offers work flexibility but often comes with economic vulnerability for its workers. Online drivers face income uncertainty and a lack of social security, threatening the welfare of their households. This study uses qualitative methods with a literature review and in-depth interviews to examine these issues. The theoretical framework combines the concepts of the precariat, digital political-economic analysis, and human security perspectives to understand the vulnerabilities experienced by workers. The results show that the flexible work system based on digital platforms creates economic uncertainty for online driver workers. This situation is characterized by fluctuating and unguaranteed income, a partnership status that is vulnerable to termination at any time, and very limited social protection. In conclusion, the pseudo-flexibility in this gig economy model creates precarious conditions that undermine the economic security of online drivers and negatively impact their families' welfare. Therefore, structural efforts are needed to improve protection and certainty for workers in Indonesia's gig economy ecosystem.

References

Aritenang. A.F. (2017). “Special Economic Zone at the Crossroads: The Case of Batam,” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik 21 (2). https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.30438.

Badan Kebijakan Fiskal. (2021). Membangun Ketangguhan Ekonomi Pada Era Pandemi. Jakarta: Kompas.

Bloomberg. (2025, Juli 22). Grab Tolak Tuntutan Bagi Hasil 90% untuk Ojol & 10% ke Aplikator. Retrieved from https://www.bloombergtechnoz.com/detail-news/77929/grab-tolak-tuntutan-bagi-hasil-90-untuk-ojol-10-ke-aplikator

Budiono, M. F. (2023). Measuring The Job Precariousness Experienced By Gojek Drivers In Indonesia. Akselerasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Nasional, 5(2), 56-64.

CNN. (2025, Mei 21). Mengintip Pendapatan Ojol yang Terus Turun Meski Kerja 11 Jam Sehari . Retrieved from https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20250521103439-92-1231467

Conversation. (2021, April 30). Riset: Empat alasan kemitraan Gojek, Grab, hingga Maxim merugikan para Ojol. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/riset-empat-alasan-kemitraan-gojek-grab-hingga-maxim-merugikan-para-ojol-159832

DANAREKSA. (2024). 2024 Annual Report Laporan Tahunan. Danareksa.

Fairwork. (2021). Fairwork Ratings Indonesia 2021: Standar Kerja Layak pada Gig Economy. Retrieved from https://fair.work/wp-content/uploads/sites/17/2021/12/Bahasa-Indonesia-Fairwork-Ratings-

Fatmawati, D., Isbah, F., & Kusumaningtyas, A. P. (2019). Pekerja Muda dan Ancaman Deskilling-Skill Trap di Sektor Transportasi Berbasis Daring. Jurnal Studi Pemuda, 29-46.

Firdaus, S. U. (2025). Ketidakadilan Ekonomi dan Alienasi Pekerja: Kritik Terhadap Sistem Ekonomi Kapitalis. J-CEKI: Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah, 615-623.

Gozali, D. S. (2020). Pengantar Perbandingan Sistem Hukum. Bandung: Nusamedia.

Healy, J., Nicholson, D., & Pekarek, A. (2017, Oct 31). Should we tak the gig economy seriously? Labour & Industri. Labour and Industry: A Journal of the Social Economic Relations of Work, 27(3), 232-248.

Hidayah. N. P. Cloet, Q.R. Pradhan. D. (2021). The Implementation of Labor Development Principles According to Job Creation Law as a Reason to Protect Wages Rights,” Bestuur 9 (1).

IDEAS. (2023, Agustus 18). Survei: Mayoritas Driver Ojol Bekerja 9-16 Jam per Hari untuk Penuhi Kebutuhan Hidup. Retrieved from https://ideas.or.id/2023/08/18/survei-mayoritas-driver-ojol-bekerja

Indoprogress. (2021, Desember 2). Ilusi “Bos Bagi Diri Sendiri”: Dunia Algoritma dan Prekariat Digital. Retrieved from https://indoprogress.com/2021/12/ilusi-bos-bagi-diri-sendiri-dunia-algoritma-dan-prekariat-digital/

Kamim, A. B., & Khandiq, M. R. (2019). Gojek dan Kerja Digital: Kerentanan dan Ilusi Kesejahteraan yang Dialami Oleh Mitra Pengemudi Dalam Kerja Berbasis Platform Digital. Jurnal Studi Pemuda, 8(1), 59-73.

Kandogan. Y. & Johnson. S. D. (2024). “Political economy and income inequality: how did trade liberalization and changes in political and economic freedom affect the middle classes across the world?” Cogent Social Science 10 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2341702.

Katadata. (2024, Mei 22). Jumlah Driver Ojol Gojek yang Dapat Jaminan Sosial 23 Kali Lipat Grab . Retrieved from https://katadata.co.id/digital

Kompas. (2022, November 29). UMP DKI 2023 Naik Jadi Rp 4,9 Juta, tetapi Ditolak Pengusaha dan Buruh. Retrieved from https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2022/11/29/05404691/ump-dki-2023-

Kumparan. (2020, April 9). Organisasi Ojol: Ada 4 Juta Driver Ojol di Indonesia. Retrieved from https://kumparan.com/kumparantech/

Kumparan. (2022, Oktober 11). Fakta-fakta Pendapatan Ojol yang Nyaris Setara Ongkos yang Keluar. Retrieved from https://kumparan.com/kumparanbisnis/fakta-fakta-pendapatan-ojol-

Liputan6. (2019, Desember 23). Maxim, Ojol Asal Rusia Penantang Gojek dan Grab di Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.liputan6.com/tekno/read/4140565/maxim-ojol-asal-rusia-penantang-gojek-da.

Lhutfi, I., Ludigdo, U., Rusydi, M.K. & Baridwan. Z. (2024). “Political economy of accounting (PEA) perspectives on sustainable development goals (SDGs) toward local government’s budgeting in Indonesia,” Cogent Social Science 10 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2388170.

Novianto, A., Wulansari, A. D., & Hernawan, A. (2021, April). Riset: empat alasan kemitraan Gojek, Grab, hingga Maxim merugikan para Ojol. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/

Nurshafira. T., Alvian. R. A. (2018). “Political-Economy of Social Entrepreneurship in Indonesia: A Polanyian Approach,” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik 22 (2). https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.27942.

Nurwidhiana, N., Handari, S. T., & Latifah, N. (2020). Hubungan Antara Stres Kerja Dengan Kejadian Hipertensi Pada Pengemudi Ojek Online Dan Ojek Pangkalan Di Kota Bekasi Tahun 2017. Environmental Occupational Health And Safety Journal, 29-38.

Pati, S. (2019). “Legal Protection for Domestic Workers: The Experience of Indonesia.” Hasanuddin Law Review, 5(3), 311–320. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v5i3.2218.

Permana, M. Y., Izzati, N. R., & Askar, M. W. (2023). Measuring the Gig Economy in Indonesia: Typology, Characteristics, and Distribution. Elsevier.

Pikirian Rakyat. (2025, Mei 22). Ojol Menjerit! Penghasilan Harian Turun dari Rp 300 Ribu Jadi Rp 170 Ribu, Driver Keluhkan Sepi Order. Retrieved from https://jabar.pikiran-rakyat.com/nasional/pr-3659350828/ojol-menjerit-penghasilan

Polimpung, H. Y. (2019, Desember). Ngomong-ngomong, apa itu pekerja ‘prekariat’? Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338211841_Ngomong-ngomong_apa_itu_pekerja_'prekariat

Pradana, I. P. (2024). Pekerja Ekonomi Gig: Pengalaman Kerja Pengemudi Ojek Online Maxim dan Grab di Wilayah Timur Indonesia. The Journal of The Indonesian Scientist Association of Public Administration (AsIAN), 11-26.

Rahman, A., Santoso, I. B., & Astawa, I. K. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Waktu Kerja bagi Pekerja/Buruh Terhadap Pelanggaran Jam Kerja yang Melebihi Waktu Kerja pada Suatu Perusahaan. Unes Law Review, 270-286.

Reuters. (2025, Mei 21). Ride-hailing drivers in Indonesia hold protests to demand better pay. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/business/world-at-work/ride-hailing-drivers-indonesia-hold-protests-demand-bette

Sargeant, M. (2017). The Gig Economy and the Future of Work. E-Journal of International Comparative Labour Studies. Retrieved from CIPS Indonesia: https://www.cips-indonesia.org/post/gig-economy-kebebasan-yang-membebaskan-kesejahteraan?lang=id

Setiawan, A. (2025, Jun 25). Gig economy: Kebebasan yang Membebaskan Kesejahteraan? (CIPS) Retrieved September 2025, from Cener for Indonesian Policy Studies: https://www.cips-indonesia.org/post/gig-economy-kebebasan-yang-membebaskan-kesejahteraan?lang=id

SINDIKASI. (2020, Agustus 28). Mengenal Gig Economy. Retrieved from https://blog.sindikasi.org/mengenal-gig-economy/: https://blog.sindikasi.org/mengenal-gig-economy/

SMERU. (2020, Desember 30). Bertahan di Tengah Pandemi COVID-19 Ditinjau dari Sudut Ekonomi. Retrieved from https://smeru.or.id/id/article-id/bertahan-di-tengah-pandemi-covid-

Standing, G. (2011). The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury.

SYAIFUDIN, I. A. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum Pekerja Gig Atas Ketidakpastian Penghasilan Perspektif Undang-Undang Ketenagakerjaan Dan Prinsip Keadilan Ibnu Taimiyah. Retrieved from https://etheses.uin-malang.ac.id/76281/1/210202110128.pdf:

TangerangNews. (2025, Mei 22). Berapa Banyak Driver Ojol di Indonesia? Segini Jumlahnya . Retrieved from https://www.tangerangnews.com/nasional/read/53760/Berapa-

Tempo. (2025, Mei 20). Alasan Gojek dan Grab Tolak Tuntutan Ojol Ubah Status Kemitraan. Retrieved from https://www.tempo.co/ekonomi/alasan-gojek-dan-grab-tolak-tuntutan-ojol-ubah-status-kemitraan-1493889

Tempo. (2025, Mei 21). Aksi Mogok Ojol Menghilangkan Perputaran Uang Rp 188 Miliar. Retrieved from https://www.tempo.co/ekonomi/aksi-mogok-ojol-menghilangkan-perputaran-uang-rp-188-miliar-1503780

Tempo. (2025, Mei 22). Asosiasi: Tak Semua Driver Ojol Menuntut Status Pekerja Tetap. Retrieved from https://www.tempo.co/ekonomi/asosiasi-tak-semua-driver-ojol-

Tempo. (2025, Mei 22). Ekonom: Industri Ojol Berkembang karena Minimnya Lapangan Kerja. Retrieved from https://www.tempo.co/ekonomi/ekonom-industri-ojol-berkembang-

Tempo. (2025, Mei 9). SPAI Serahkan Kajian Perubahan Status Ojol Jadi Pekerja ke Kemnaker. Retrieved from https://www.tempo.co/ekonomi/spai-serahkan-kajian-perubahan-status-ojol-jadi-pekerja-ke-kemnaker-1377218

Tirto. (2019, Februari 25). Kemenhub Hapus Aturan Jam Kerja Ojek Online. Retrieved from https://tirto.id/kemenhub-hapus-aturan-jam-kerja-

Tirto. (2024, September 2). Nestapa Ojol: Tulang Punggung Ekonomi, tapi Tak Dapat Hak Layak. Retrieved from https://tirto.id/nestapa-ojol-tulang-punggung-ekonomi-tapi-tak-dapat-hak-layak-g3hA#google_vignette: https://tirto.id/nestapa-ojol-tulang-punggung-ekonomi-tapi-tak-dapat-hak-layak-g3hA#google_vignette

Tirto. (2025, Mei 8). 1,7 Juta Pengemudi Ojol Belum Punya BPJS Ketenagakerjaan. Retrieved from https://tirto.id/17-juta-pengemudi-ojol-belum-punya-bpjs-ketenagakerjaan-hbv2: https://tirto.id/17-juta-pengemudi-ojol-belum-punya-bpjs-ketenagakerjaan-hbv2

Tokopedia, G. G. (2022). One Enduring Ecosystem. 2022 Laporan Tahunan. PT GoTo Gojek Tokopedia Tbk.

UNDIP. (n.d.). Gambaran Umum Maxim Dan Wilayah Kota Semarang. Retrieved from https://eprints2.undip.ac.id/id/eprint/21928/3/BAB%202.pdf:

ZAKKY, M. W. (2025). Pengaruh Fleksibilitas Kerja, Kesehatan Mental Dan Kepuasan Kerja Terhadap Loyalitas Mitra Kerja Driver Shopeefood Di Kota Malang Dengan Work Life Balance Sebagai Variabel Mediasi. Retrieved from https://etheses.uin-malang.ac.id/75412/2/210501110002.pdf: