Efektivitas Peningkatan Kinerja Aparatur Sipil Negara Melalui Sistem Merit (Meryt System) Pada Sekretariat Daerah Kabupaten Bener Meriah Tahun 2019

Didi Kusmana, Zulham -, Muhammad Bin Abubakar

Abstract


The Regional Secretariat of the Bener Meriah Regency in 2019 is the location of this study, which explores the efficacy of raising state public servants' performance using the merit system. The goal of the study is to comprehend how the spoil system can impede efforts to increase ASN performance as well as the efficacy of enhancing ASN performance through the merit system. Hani Handoko's theory of effectiveness, which uses outcome indicators (results) from the execution of programs/activities, is the theoretical framework that is applied. A qualitative research method was adopted for the study. The findings revealed that improving the performance of ASN through the Merit System at the Bener Meriah Secretariat in 2019 was still ineffective due to the low quality of the ASN serving in the Bener Meriah Secretariat due to the influence of the spoil system implementation due to the element of closeness or kinship with political officials in the area. Regency Bener Meriah The spoil system has a significant impact and hinders the effectiveness of improving the performance of ASN in the Bener Meriah Secretariat in 2019, because if the spoil system is still used in the placement and recruitment of ASN placed in the Setdakab, it will have an impact on the performance of other ASN, because the roles of ASN are different because ASN roles that are placed based on ability and competence qualifications will be defeated by ASN that is dominated by a spoil system because it is based on political power or through political intervention and power.


Keywords


Effectivity, Performance, Merit System

Full Text:

PDF

References


Australian Public Service Commission, Merit in Recruitment, apsc.gov.au, 2018.

Blunt, P. Turner, M.,& Lindroth, H, 2012. “Patronage Progress in Post Suharto Indonesia, Public Administration and Development, 32 (1),

Caverley, N. 2002. Monitoring Merit. Institute of Public Administration of Canada (IPAC) Case Program in Canadian Public Administration.

Hasan Shadily, 1980. Ensiklopedia Bahasa Indonesia. IchtiarBaru-Van Hoevedan Elsevier Publishing projects

Henry Simamora, 1995. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, STIE YKPN, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Inu Kencana. 2006. Ilmu Administrasi Publik. Jakarta: PT.Rineka Cipta

Kast, Fremont dan E, Rosenzweig, James. 2002. Organisasi dan Manajemen 1. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.

Kementerian Pendayaguaan Aparatur Negara. 2018. Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Nomor 40 Tahun 2018 tentang Pedoman Sistem Merit dalam Manajemen Aparatur Sipil Negara. Jakarta: Kemenkumham.

Komisi Aparatur Sipil Negara. 2017. Peraturan Ketua Komisi Aparatur Sipil Negara Nomor 5 Tahun 2017 tentang Penilaian Mandiri Penerapan Sistem Merit dalam Manajemen Aparatur Sipil Negara di Instansi Pemerintah. Jakarta: Kemenkumham.

Mahmudi. 2005. Manajemen Kinerja Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: UPP AMP YKPN.

Mahsun, M, 2006. Pengukuran Kinerja Sektor Publik,. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Miles, Mathew B. 1994. Qualitative data analisys: an expanded sourcebook, London; United Kingdom, SAGE Publication, Inc,

Mohammad As’ad, 1995. Psikologi Industry. Edisi Keempat, Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Prabu, Mangkunegara Anwar. 2005. Evaluasi Kinerja SDM. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Republik Indonesia. 2014. Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN). Jakarta: Kemenkumham.

Republik Indonesia. 2017. Peraturan Presiden Nomor 11 Tahun 2017 tentang Manajemen Pegawai Negeri Sipil (PNS). Jakarta: Kemenkumham.

Sedarmayanti, 2003. Good Governance : Dalam Rangka Otonomi Daerah Upaya Membangun Organisasi Efektif dan Efisien melalui Restrukturasi dan Pemberdayaan, Ed 1, Bandung : Mandar Maju.

Sendow. 2007. Pengukuran Kinerja Karyawan.Jakarta: Gunung Agung.

Stephen P Robbins, 2000. Perilaku Organisasi, Edisi Bahasa Indonesia, Jakarta : Prinhalindo.

Sugiyono. 2017. Metode Penelitian Kunatitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.

Susanto, Ely. 2017. Change in Paradigm of Civil Servant Management in Indonesia: From a Traditional Toward a Strategic Approach: Opportunities and Challenges. International Journal of Policy Studies Vol.8, No.2, 67 86.

Sutarto. 2006. Dasar-Dasar Organisasi. Gadjah Mada University Press. Yogyakarta.

Transparency International, 2018. Corruption Perception Index of 2018, Berlin: Transparency International.

Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 Tentang Manajemen Aparatur Sipil Negara

United Nation Development Programme. 2015. Meritocracy for Public Service Excellence. Singapore: UNDP Global Centre for Public Service Excellence.

United States Merit System Protection Board. 2017. The Merit System Principles: Keys to Managing Federal Workforce. Washington, DC: USMSPB.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29103/jtp.v2i2.8695

Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 122 times
 PDF Downloaded : 158 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Jurnal Transparansi Publik (JTP) EISSN: 2809-1310 Flag Counter