PREMAN POLITIK DAN PASAR: ANCAMAN KEAMANAN TERHADAP IKLIM INVESTASI INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29103/jspm.v6i2.21933Keywords:
Thugging, Political Parties, Investment Climate, Global Competitiveness, IndonesiaAbstract
The phenomenon of thuggery in Indonesia is a complex problem that is rooted in the socio-political and economic structure of this country. This article aims to analyze the relationship between thuggery and political parties, as well as examine its impact on Indonesia's investment climate and global competitiveness. The research was conducted with a qualitative-descriptive approach, using secondary data obtained from literature studies, international agency reports, the latest government policy analysis, and equipped with a systematic luterature review (SLR) on related themes. The findings of the study show that thuggery evolved from a long history from the colonial era to the reform period, with a pattern of close relationships between thugs and political elites through networks of patronage and political clientelism. Thuggery is also used intensively as a tool of mass mobilization and an instrument of intimidation in electoral competitions. The impact on the investment climate is significant, as it creates additional costs in the form of illegal levies and intimidation, lowers investor confidence, and weakens Indonesia's competitiveness compared to neighboring countries such as Vietnam, Malaysia, and Thailand. The government has implemented a number of important policies, including the establishment of the Thugs Task Force by President Prabowo Subianto in May 2025, to overcome thuggery and create better stability for the business world. However, major challenges are still faced such as the involvement of officials, strong networks of thugs, and weak community participation. This article recommends strengthening synergy between the government, law enforcement, the business world, and the wider community through regulatory reform, increased transparency, and strict supervision. This step is expected to effectively reduce the negative impact of thuggery, improve the investment climate, and lift Indonesia's global competitiveness in the long term.
References
American Chamber of Commerce in Indonesia [AmCham]. (2020). Indonesia Investment Report 2020. AmCham Indonesia.
Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for Sale: Elections, Clientelism, and the State in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.
Aspinall, E., & Mietzner, M. (2019). Politics in Contemporary Indonesia: Institutional Change, Policy Challenges and Democratic Decline. Routledge.
Azca, M. N. (2011). In between military and militia: The dynamics of the security forces in the communal conflict in Ambon. Asian Journal of Social Science, 39(4), 565–587.
Barker, J. (2009). State of fear: Controlling the criminal contagion in Suharto’s New Order. Indonesia, (87), 1–26.
Berenschot, W. (2019). Informal governance and citizenship: The everyday state in Indonesia. Development and Change, 50(6), 1595–1615.
Brass, P. R. (2004). Forms of Collective Violence: Riots, Pogroms, and Genocide in Modern India. Princeton University Press.
Cribb, R. (1991). Gangsters and Revolutionaries: The Jakarta People's Militia and the Indonesian Revolution 1945-1949. University of Hawaii Press.
Hadiz, V. R. (2010). Localising Power in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia: A Southeast Asia Perspective. Stanford University Press.
Indonesian National Shipowners' Association [INSA]. (2021). Laporan Tahunan INSA 2021: Tantangan dan Solusi Industri Pelayaran Nasional. INSA Publishing.
International Crisis Group [ICG]. (2012). Dynamics of Violence in Papua. Asia Report No. 232, International Crisis Group.
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(2), 220-246.
Lay, C. (2014). Local politics and the dynamics of clientelism in Indonesia. In Aspinall & Sukmajati (Eds.), Electoral dynamics in Indonesia. NUS Press.
Lindsey, T. (2001). The Criminal State: Premanisme and the New Indonesia. In G. Lloyd & S. Smith (Eds.), Indonesia Today: Challenges of History (pp. 283–297). Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
McKinsey & Company. (2018). Unlocking Indonesia’s Economic Potential. McKinsey Global Institute.
Mietzner, M. (2007). Party financing in post-Soeharto Indonesia: Between state subsidies and political corruption. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 29(2), 238–263.
Mietzner, M. (2013). Money, Power, and Ideology: Political Parties in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia. NUS Press.
Ryter, L. (1998). Pemuda Pancasila: The Last Loyalist Free Men of Suharto’s Order?. Indonesia, 66, 45–73.
Savirani, A. (2016). Patronage politics in Java: Clientelism, particularistic ties, and money politics. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 35(3), 123–147.
Siregar, R. H. (2019). Political economy and local investment climate in decentralised Indonesia. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 36(2), 245–263.
Scott, J. C. (1972). Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia. American Political Science Review, 66(1), 91–113.
Tilly, C. (2003). The Politics of Collective Violence. Cambridge University Press.
Warburton, E. (2018). The technocratic populism of Indonesia’s Jokowi. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 54(3), 297–320.
Wilson, I. D. (2010). Violence and the urban poor in Jakarta: Security, citizenship, and 'kampung rules'. Critical Asian Studies, 42(4), 585–607.
Wilson, I. D. (2015). The Politics of Protection Rackets in Post-New Order Indonesia: Coercive Capital, Authority, and Street Politics. Routledge.
World Bank. (2020). Indonesia Economic Prospects: Towards a Secure and Fast Recovery. World Bank Group.
World Bank. (2020). Doing Business 2020: Economy Profile of Indonesia. World Bank Group.
World Economic Forum [WEF]. (2020). The Global Competitiveness Report 2020. World Economic Forum.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ali Nurdin, Nenden Suciyati Sartika, Verliani Dasmaran, Siti Nurbani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
.png)
