ANALISIS BREAK EVENT POINT (BEP) PADA PT. ES MUDA PERKASA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE HARGA POKOK PRODUKSI (HPP)
Abstract
The survival of the company or the growth of the company, one part of the planning of profit planning profit used in the company is Break Even Point (BEP), which explains the relationship between costs, production volume, selling price in order to obtain the results of the company's research. This pricing is one of the determinants of competition in the market with similar industries. PT. Es Muda Perkasa is a company engaged in the industry of making ice blocks. In the competition, PT. Es Muda Perkasa has an approved selling price sufficient to compete in the industrial world but the prices offered by PT. Mighty Ice Young is still low. This is of course difficult for companies to be able to compete because the pricing that is applied is only based on estimation, so the price determined is not in accordance with production costs. Therefore the company needs to return to how the strategy of determining the price so that it can be achieved maximally, the determination and achievement of the BEP of the company can reach within a specified time. This study aims to analyze Break Event Point (BEP) at PT. Es Muda Perkasa, by determining the optimal selling price of ice blocks. The research method used in this study uses the calculation of event break-even points using the method of calculating the cost of production. Data collection using collection of observations, interviews, and literature studies. The results of the study showed break-even (break-even point) PT. Perkasa Es Muda after selling beam products as many as 2400 blocks with a turnover obtained for BEP amounting to Rp.605,812 with a selling price of ice blocks of Rp. 18.496 / stem.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alma. Buchari dan Ratih Hurriyati. 2008. Manajemen Corporate dan Strategi Pemasaran Jasa Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Damayanti. dan Christomo. 2014. Analisa Biaya Permintaan terhadap Penetapan Harga Marginal Unit Rumah di Perumahan Royal Regency. Lumajang. Jurnal Teknik Pomits. Vol 3. No 1.
Daryanto. 2011. Manajemen Pemasaran: Sari Kuliah. Bandung: Satu Nusa.
Djarwanto dan Pangestu Subagyo. 2002. Statistik Induktif. Edisi ke empat. Cetakan Keempat. BPFE. Yogyakarta.
Ferdinand. A. 2006. Metode Penelitian Manajemen. Semarang: Univ. Diponegoro.
Fransisca. Agnes. 2011. Perhitungan Harga Pokok Produksi Kain Yang Sebenarnya Untuk Penetapan Harga Jual. (Studi Kasus Pada PT. Panca Mitra Sandang Indah). Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Nomor 4 Tahun ke 2.
Garrison. R. H. 2003. Managerial Acounting. Institut Teknologi Bandung. Bandung: Penerbit Erlangga.
Herjanto. Eddy. 2007. Manajemen Operasi. Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Kotler Philip. Amstrong Gary. 2013. Prinsip-Prinsip Pemasaran. Edisi Ke-12. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Kotler. a Philip. 2002. Manajemen Pemasaran. Jilid I. Edisi Indonesia. Edisi Milenium. Edisi Kesepuluh. Penerbit PT. Prenhallindo. Jakarta.
Kotler. b Philip. 2002. Manajemen Pemasaran. Jilid II. Edisi Indonesia. Edisi Milenium.Edisi Kesepuluh. Penerbit PT. Prenhallindo. Jakarta.
Kotler. Philip And Gary Armstrong. 2008. Prinsip-Prinsip Pemasaran. Edisi 12. Jilid 1. Jakarta; Erlangga.
Muhammad DY. Novirani. Adianto. Penetapan Harga Jual Batu Bata Menggunakan Metode Target Profit Pricing. Jurnal Teknik Industri. Institut Teknologi Nasional (Itenas) Bandung. Vol. 02. N0. 03.
Mulyadi. 2009. Akuntansi Biaya. Edisi 5. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.
Sukirno. Sadono. 2012. Mikro Ekonomi Teori Pengantar. Cetakan ke-19 dan ke-27.
Supiadi. 2014. Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemenuhan Hak-Hak PDAM Kota Samarinda. Jurnal Beraja Niti. Vol 3(7): 1-23.
Tjiptono. Fandy. (2011). Strategi Pemasaran. Edisi 3. Yogyakarta : ANDI.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29103/jak.v8i1.2327
Article Metrics
Abstract Views : 1862 timesPDF Downloaded : 15 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Chairul Amni
ISSN 2301-4717