Orientasi Eksternal, Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan, dan Emisi Polusi

Nurna Aziza

doi:10.29103/jak.v12i1.14665

Orientasi Eksternal, Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan, dan Emisi Polusi

Nurna Aziza

Abstract

Companies in open economies with stronger external orientations have come under pressure from customers and other stakeholders to implement global corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities since the 2000s. The purpose of this study proposes a relationship between CSR, the level of external orientation, and pollution emissions, such as pollution reduction. It uses an empirical methodology using secondary data for manufacturing companies. The results showed that external orientation is related to pollution emissions, corporate social responsibility is negatively related to pollution emissions, and there is a proven moderating effect on pollution emissions. The higher the external orientation but with high corporate social responsibility can withstand the increase in pollution emissions by manufacturing companies.

Keywords

Open Economy, Pollution Emissions, External Orientation, Pollution Reduction, Social Responsibility

Full Text:

PDF PDF

References

Antweiler, W., Copeland, B., Taylor, M., 2001. Is free trade good for the environment? Am. Econ. Rev. 91 (4), 877–908.

Barcena-Ruiz, J.C., Sagasta, A., 2022. Cross-ownership and corporate social responsibility. Energy Econ. 106104.

Bombardini, M., Li, B., 2020. Trade, pollution and mortality in China. J. Int. Econ. 12, 103321.

Chichilnisky, C., 1994. North-South trade and the global environment. Am. Econ. Rev. 84, 851–874.

Christensen, H., Hail, L., Leuz, C., 2019. Adoption of CSR and sustainability reporting standards: economic analysis and review. SSRN J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ ssrn.3427748.

Clarkson, P.M., Li, Y., Richardson, G.D., Vasvari, F.P., 2008. Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: an empirical analysis. Account. Organ. Soc. 33 (4–5), 303–327.

Deere Birkbeck, C., 2021. Greening International Trade: Pathways Forward. Global Governance Centre and the Forum on Trade, Environment & the SDGs (TESS), Geneva.

Fukuda, K., Ouchida, Y., 2020. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and the environment: does CSR increase emissions? Energy Econ. 92, 104933.

Hart, S.L., 2011. A natural-resource-based view of the firm: fifteen years after. J. Manag. 37 (5), 1464–1479.

Ioannou, I., Serafeim, G., 2017. The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting. In: Harvard Business School Research Working Paper, No. 11-100.

Kraus, S., Rehman, S.U., García, F.J.S., 2020. Corporate social responsibility and environmental performance: the mediating role of environmental strategy and green innovation. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 160, 120262.

Lu, Z., Mahalik, M.K., Mallick, H., Zhao, R., 2022. The moderating effects of democracy and technology adoption on the relationship between trade liberalisation and carbon emissions. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 180, 121712.

Aziza. N, 2014. Anteseden Pengungkapan Lingkungan dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Image Perusahaan (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di Indonesia). Jurnal Fairness, Vol. 4 No. 1. 2014, 1 – 22.

Pham, H.S.T., Tran, H.T., 2020. CSR disclosure and firm performance: the mediating role of corporate reputation and moderating role of CEO integrity. J. Bus. Res. 120, 127–136.

Purwaningsih. R, N.Aziza. 2019. Pengaruh Corporate Social Responsibilty terhadap Financial Distress Dimoderasi oleh Siklus Hidup Perusahaan pada tahan Mature. Jurnal Akuntansi Vol.19, No. 3 Hal 173 – 186. https://doi.org/10.33369/j.akuntansi.9.3.173-186.

Wang, Q., Dou, J., Jia, S., 2016. A meta-analytic review of corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: the moderating effect of contextual factors. Bus. Soc. 55 (8), 1083–1121.

Xu, Y., Dietzenbacher, E., Los, B., 2020. International trade and air pollution damages in the United States. Ecol. Econ. 171, 106599.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29103/jak.v12i1.14665