Understanding of Physics Concepts by Samudra Langsa University Students

Nuril Husna, Evendi Evendi, Rini Safitri, Wahyuni Wahyuni

Abstract


Understanding is the main basis for self-improvement in using various methods to create ideas. There are several levels in understanding, namely cognitive primitive, Image Making, Image Having, Property Noticing, formalizing, observing, structuring, inventizing c. This research is a type of research with a descriptive qualitative approach. The results showed that the first subject had the ability to understand concepts and was in the formalizing stage. There are as many as 35% of students who are at the formalizing stage. The second subject is still in the image-making stage. As many as 65% of students are in the image-making stage.


Keywords


understanding; concepts; physics.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, L. W. (1999). Rethinking Bloom’s Taxonomy: Implications for testing and assessment. The Educational Resources Information Cente, 1–25.

Bilal, E., & Erol, M. (2012). Effect of teaching via modeling on achievement and conceptual understanding concerning electricity. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 11(3), 236–247.

Caleon, I., & Subramaniam, R. (2010). Development and application of a three-tier diagnostic test to assess secondary students’ understanding of waves. International Journal of Science Education, 32(7), 939–961. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902890130

Çepni, S., & Şahin, Ç. (2012). Effect of Different Teaching Methods and Techniques Embedded in the 5E Instructional Model on Students ’ Learning about Buoyancy Force. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 4(2), 97–127.

Costu, B. (2008). Learning Science through the PDEODE Teaching Strategy : Helping Students Make Sense of. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(1), 3–9.

Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(2), 1–58. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020119

Hung, W., & Jonassen, D. H. (2006). Conceptual understanding of causal reasoning in physics. International Journal of Science Education, 28(13), 1601–1621. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600560902

Jensen, J. L., McDaniel, M. A., Woodard, S. M., & Kummer, T. A. (2014). Teaching to the Test...or Testing to Teach: Exams Requiring Higher Order Thinking Skills Encourage Greater Conceptual Understanding. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), 307–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9248-9

Kade, A., Degeng, I. N. S., & Ali, M. N. (2019). Effect of jigsaw strategy and learning style to conceptual understanding on senior high school students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(19), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i19.11592

Kola, A. J. (2017). Investigating the Conceptual Understanding of Physics through an Interactive-Lecture Engagement. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 6(1), 82–96.

Kotthoff, L. (2016). Algorithm selection for combinatorial search problems: A survey. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10101 LNCS, 149–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50137-6_7

Kulkarni, V., & Tambade, P. (2013). Assessing the Conceptual Understanding about Heat and Thermodynamics at Undergraduate Level. European Journal Of Physics Education, 4(2), 9–16. Retrieved from http://ejpe.erciyes.edu.tr/index.php/EJPE/article/view/101

Kusuma, M. D., Rosidin, U., Abdurrahman, A., & Suyatna, A. (2017). The Development of Higher Order Thinking Skill (Hots) Instrument Assessment In Physics Study. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSRJRME), 07(01), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0701052632

Nadhor, N., & Taqwa, M. R. A. (2020). Pemahaman Konsep Kinematika Mahasiswa Calon Guru Fisika: Ditinjau dari Level Pemahaman dan Teori Resource. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 4(3), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.4.3.82-90

Piirto, J. (2016). Creative Intelligence in the 21st Century In The Creative Intelligence of Teachers Resisting the Pearsonizing of Global Education. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Vol. 11).

Pirie, S., & Kieren, T. (1989). A Recursive Theory of Mathematical Understand. JStor, 9(3), 7–11.

Radovanović, J., & Sliško, J. (2013). Applying a predict-observe-explain sequence in teaching of buoyant force. Physics Education, 48(1), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/48/1/28

Rahmawati, I. D., Suparmi, & Sunarno, W. (2018). Students concept understanding of fluid static based on the types of teaching. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012029

Sagala, R., Umam, R., Thahir, A., Saregar, A., & Wardani, I. (2019). The effectiveness of stem-based on gender differences: The impact of physics concept understanding. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 753–761. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.3.753

Saputra, H., Kade, A., & Hatibe, A. (2017). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Levels of Inquiry ( LOI ) terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Fisika Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 3 Sigi. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako, 5(4), 21–26.

Saricayir, H., Ay, S., Comek, A., Cansiz, G., & Uce, M. (2016). Determining Students’ Conceptual Understanding Level of Thermodynamics. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(6), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i6.1421

Shidik, M. A. (2020). Hubungan Antara Motivasi Belajar Dengan Pemahaman Konsep Fisika Peserta Didik Man Baraka. Jurnal Kumparan Fisika, 3(2), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.33369/jkf.3.2.91-98

Taqwa, M. R. A., Priyadi, R., & Rivaldo, L. (2019). Pemahaman Konsep Suhu Dan Kalor Mahasiswa Calon Guru. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 7(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.24127/jpf.v7i1.1547

Wicaksono, I., Wasis, & Madlazim. (2017). the Effectiveness of Virtual Science Teaching Model ( Vs-Tm ) To Improve Student ’ S Scientific Creativity and Concept School Physics Subject Issn 1648-3898 Issn 2538-7138. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(4), 549–561.

Wilson, L. O. (2016). Anderson and Krathwohl Bloom’s Taxonomy Revised Understanding the New Version of Bloom’s Taxonomy. The Second Principle, 1–8. Retrieved from https://quincycollege.edu/content/uploads/Anderson-and-Krathwohl_Revised-Blooms-Taxonomy.pdf%0Ahttps://thesecondprinciple.com/teaching-essentials/beyond-bloom-cognitive-taxonomy-revised/%0Ahttp://thesecondprinciple.com/teaching-essentials/beyond-bloom-cog

Yana, A. U., Antasari, L., & Kurniawan, B. R. (2019). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Gelombang Mekanik Melalui Aplikasi Online Quizizz. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education), 7(2), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v7i2.14284

Zydney, J. M., & Warner, Z. (2016). Mobile apps for science learning: Review of research. Computers and Education, 94, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.001




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v3i6.5254

Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 17 times
 PDF Downloaded : 4 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Nuril Husna, Evendi, Rini Safitri & Wahyuni


International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies (IJEVS)

E-ISSN : 2684-6950