The development of cooperative learning models of Make A Macth type of historical materials of the formulation and rativication of the 1945 Constitution to improve of students’ learning outcomes

Defa Mashuri


This study was conducted in the 2018/2019 academic year and is motivated by the learning outcomes of class VII students for the 2017/2018 academic year on the historical material of the formulation and ratification of the 1945 NRI Constitution which has not yet reached the KKM: 75.00 with an average grade per grade of 55.00. The objectives of this study are 1). Produce validity, practicality, and effect liveness of the learning model Pkn. This type of research is the research and development of a 4-D model design with modifications to 3-D adapted from Thiagarajan. Limited trials were conducted in class VII-A. Data collection techniques used validation, observation, questionnaires, pre-test & post-test ins trumpets. The study data analysis yielded:1). The validity level of the syllabus is: 3.17, RPP: 3.28, Bas: 3.17, Lks: 3.19, Question Card: 3.12 & Answer Card: 3.27 and Assessment Card: 3.19 and Pre-test questions: 3.22 & Post-test questions: 3.19.2). The level of practicality of the average Rpp implementation: 3.34, Average Bas readability: 89.63%, and Lks: 90.85%. 3). The level of effectiveness of student responses showed positive responses with an average: 86.60% of the learning tools. Students' activities when teaching and learning process in class showed 86.60% of VII-A students were very active in following the make a match learning model. Analysis of learning outcomes obtained an average N-Gain: 0.58 and showed an increase with the average category average and pre-test average value: 60.09 & post-test average value: 83.61.


Development; Cooperative learning model; Make A Match; Learning Outcomes;

Full Text:



Ali, M.& Asrori, M. (2006). Psychology of Youth Development of Students. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Arikunto, S. (1998). Prosedur Research A Practical Approach. Jakarta: PT.Rineka Cipta.

Arikunto, S. (2009). Basics of educational evaluation (revised edition). Bandung: PT. Bumi aksara.

Anisa, N. A. (2017). The application of the cooperative learning model of the make a macth type to improve the learning achievement of grade X accounting 1 students in Basic Competence: Keeping a customized journal of accounting for grade X students of accounting 1 SMK Koperasi Yogyakarta Academic year. 2016/2017. Skripsi.

Boeree, G., C. (Methods of Learning & Teaching criticism and suggestions of the world of learning and teaching education. Yogyakarta: Publisher AR-Ruzz Media.

Creswell, J.,W. (2010). Research Design Approaches to Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.

Ciftci, S. (2015). The effect of using problem based learning in social studies education and student attitude toward social studies courses. Journal procedia.

Dahar, R.W. (1998).Learning Theory. Jakarta: Dekdikbud & Dirjen Pen didikan Tinggi proyek pengembangan LPTK Jakarta.

Depdiknas. (2008). Instructional Material Development Guide. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Depdiknas. (2009). Development of a Learning Lesson Plan. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Dariyo, A. (2004). Adolescent Developmental Psychology.Ciawi-Bogor: PT.Ghalia Indonesia.

Emzir. (2008). Quantitative & Qualitative Educational Research Methodology:Jakarta : PT.Raja Grafido Persada.

Ennis, R.,H. (1962).”A Concept of Critical Thinking”.Harvard Educational Review.Vol.32, No.(1), Hal : 81-111.

Ennis, R.H. (1996).Critical Thinking. The University of illinois: Prentice Hall Inc.

Fisher, A. (2009).Critical Thinking an introduction.Jakarta: PT. Erlangga.

Mulia, T., P. (2017). “Development of Natural Science Teaching Devices with a Cooperative Learning Model Type of make a match Aided by flash media to reduce misconceptions in the material of the human circulatory system in elementary school students“.

Mulyana, D. (2010). Qualitative Research Methodology. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosda Karya.

Mifta, D., R. (2015). “The implementation of the make a match cooperative learning model as an effort to increase student participation and learning outcomes in multimedia vocational subjects in grade X Multimedia at SMK Negeri 6 Purworejo”.

Minatul, M. R. (2012). ”The Effect of Make A Match Cooperative Teaching Model on Mathematics Learning Outcomes in grade IV SDN 03 Sumberejo Students in Academic Year 2012/2013”.

Mashuri, D. (2019). Development of Cooperative Learning Models of Make A Macth Type of Historical Materials of The Formulation And Rativication of The 1945 Constitution To Improve Students Learning Outcomes. Tesis. Unesa Social Studies Education Master Program, Postgraduate of State University of Surabaya.

Nurmareta, S. G. (2017). Development of PBL-based digital learning tools to improve students' critical thinking skills, theme of the role and function of natural resources. Surabaya: Comprehensive Paper Post Graduate State University of Surabaya.

Hadjar, I. (1996). Basics of quantitative methods in education. Jakarta: Publisher Raja Grafido Persada.

Hasbullah. (2009). Basic In Science education. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Handayani, L. (2015). Development of Social Studies Learning Tools with an Inquiry Approach. Journal of social education studies.Vol.4, No.1, page: 1-7.

Panuju, P. & Umani, I. (1999). Adolescent Psychology. Yogyakarta : PT. Tiara Wacana Yogyakarta.

Paul, Eggen & Don, Kauchak. (2012). ” Learning Strategies and Models ”Teaching Content and Thinking Skills”.6th edition. Jakarta: Penerbit Indeks.

Putri, T. M. (2017).” Development of Cooperative Science Learning Tools Type Make A Match with Flash Media Assistance to Reduce Misconceptions of Elementary School Students on Human Circulatory System Material”. Surabaya. Thesis Post Graduate of State University of Surabaya.

Riduwan. (2010). Thesis Preparation Methods and Techniques. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.

Riyanto, Y. (2009). New Paradigm of learning. Jakarta : Publisher Prenadermedia Group.

Rusman. (2012). Learning Models, Developing Teacher Professionalism, 2nd Edition. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.

Sarwono, J.(2006). Quantitative & Qualitative Research Methods. Yogyakarta: Publisher Graha Ilmu.

Sugiyono. (2009). Quantitative Research Methods, Qualitative and R&D. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2016). Statistics For Research. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suprijono, A. (2009). Theory and Applications "Collection of Cooperative Learning Learning Methods”. Surabaya.

Suprijono, A. (2011). Cooperative Learning : TPaikem's Theory and Application. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Suprijono, A.(2016). The Pilatory Emmanence Learning Model. Yogyaarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Suryanti. (2008). Innovative Learning Models. Surabaya: Unesa University Press.

Singarimbum, M. & Effendi, S.(1989). Survey Research Methods.Jakarta: PT.Pustaka LP3ES Indonesia, anggota IKAPI.

Sanjaya, W. (2016). Educational Process Standards Oriented Learning Strategy. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Sagala, S. (2006). Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Trianto. (2007). Integrated Learning Model In Theory And Practice. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.

Tim Penyusun. (2016). Guidelines for Writing a Thesis and Dissertation for the Postgraduate Program of the State University of Surabaya 2016/2017. Pasca

Winataputra, U.S. (2003). Teaching and Learning Strategies. Jakarta: The Open University Publishing Center.

Yulvi, M. (2017). Development of Student Worksheets (LKS) Type make a match on Compound Nomenclature in Senior High School 1 Kota Jantho Aceh Besar.

Zuriah, N. (2006). Social Research Methodology and Theory Education-Application. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 15 times
 PDF Downloaded : 14 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 Defa Mashuri

International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies (IJEVS)

E-ISSN : 2684-6950