The A6S Information Literacy Model for Digital Age Library instruction

Authors

  • Arman Arman Department of Educational Technology, Postgraduate Program of State University of Jakarta, 13220
  • Murni Winarsih Department of Educational Technology, Postgraduate Program of State University of Jakarta, 13220
  • Nurdin Ibrahim Department of Educational Technology, Postgraduate Program of State University of Jakarta, 13220

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v1i8.2269

Keywords:

Information Literacy, Instructional Design, Library Instruction

Abstract

Information literacy has became a central issue of modern society. The rapid growth of information technology (IL) and the emergence of new digital devices not only require changes in the concept of IL itself, but also in practice. This paper discusses findings of study of design and development research with the goal of study was to develop the development of blended model of information literacy instruction (ILI) for higher education library instruction. Data were collected through a checklist, pretest, posttest, and attitude questionnaire throughout a series of formative evaluation stages. The data obtained were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. The result showed that the A6S (analyze, select, search, sort, synthesize, share, and self-evaluation) information model effective to enhance students IL. offered recommendation regarding implementation in library instructions

References

ACRL. (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.

Afacan, Y. (2018). Student experiences of blended learning in interior architecture. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 17, 399-422.

ALA, & AECT. (1998). Information power: Building partnerships for learning. http://www.ala.org/ala/aasl/aaslproftools/informationpower/InformationLiteracyStandards_final.pdf

Arends, R., & Kilcher, A. (2010). Teaching For Student Learning. New York: Taylor & Francis.

Barbazette, J. (2013). How to write terrific training materials: Methods, tools, and techniques. San Fransisco: John Wiley & Sons.

Bawden, D. (2001). Information and digital literacies: a review of concepts. Journal of documentation, 57(2), 218-259.

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach (Vol. 722). New York: Springer Science & Business Media.

Bundy, A. (2004). Australian and New Zealand Information Literacy Framework: Principles, Standards and Practice 2. http://wwwxaulxdu.au/InfoLiteracv/lnfoLiteracyFramework.pdf

Çoklar, A. N., Yaman, N. D., & Yurdakul, I. K. (2017). Information literacy and digital nativity as determinants of online information search strategies. Computers in human behavior, 70, 1-9.

Crawford, J. (2006). The use of electronic information services and information literacy: A Glasgow Caledonian University study. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 38(1), 33-44.

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. California: Sage publications.

Doran, R. L. (2002). Science educator's guide to laboratory assessment. Danvers, MA.: NSTA press.

Feng, L., & Ha, J.-L. (2016). Effects of Teachers' Information Literacy on Lifelong Learning and School Effectiveness. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(6).

Gagne, R. M., Wager, W. W., Golas, K. C., Keller, J. M., & Russell, J. D. (2005). Principles of instructional design. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. New York: Wiley Computer Pub.

Goodman, V. D. (2009). Keeping the user in mind: Instructional design and the modern library. Cambridge: Elsevier.

Haythornthwaite, C., & Andrews, R. (2011). E-learning theory and practice. London: Sage Publications.

Hepworth, M., & Walton, G. (2009). Teaching information literacy for inquiry-based learning. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.

Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2017). THE Blended WORKBOOK: Learning to Design the Schools of Our Future. San Fransisco: Wiley.

IFLA. (2011). IFLA media and information literacy recommendations [Press release]. Retrieved from

https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/information-literacy/publications/media-info-lit-recommend-en.pdf

Innes, R. B. (2004). Reconstructing undergraduate education: Using learning science to design effective courses. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ju, S. Y. (2018). Perceptions and practices of blended learning in foreign language teaching at USIM. European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research, 12(1), 170-176.

Kan'an, A. (2018). The Relationship between Jordanian Students' 21 st Century Skills (Cs21) and Academic Achievement in Science. Journal of Turkish Science Education (TUSED), 15(2).

Kavitha, R. K. J., W. ( 2019). A study on the student experiences in blended learning environments. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 7., 183-186.

Kavšek, T., Peklaj, C., & Žugelj, U. (2016). Information literacy training evaluation: the case of first year psychology students. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(4), 293-299.

Kguchi, A. (2015). Educational Robotics as a Learning Tool for Promoting Rich Environments for Active Learning (REALs). In J. Keengwe (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Educational Technology Integration and Active Learning (pp. 19-47). Hershey, PA.: IGI Global.

Khatun, M., Virkus, S., & Rahman, A. J. (2015). Digital information literacy: a case study in Oslo public library. Paper presented at the European Conference on Information Literacy.

Lanham, R. A. (1995). Digital Literacy. Scientific American, 3(273), 198-199.

Lanning, S. (2017). Concise guide to information literacy. California: ABC-CLIO.

Lin, Y.-W., Tseng, C.-L., & Chiang, P.-J. (2017). The Effect of Blended Learning in Mathematics Course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 13(3).

Lombard, E. (2010). Pursuing information literacy: Roles and relationships. Cambridge: Chandos Publishing.

Mackey, T. P., & Jacobson, T. E. (2014). Metaliteracy: Reinventing information literacy to empower learners. Chicago: American Library Association.

Mahmood, K. (2016). Do people overestimate their information literacy skills? A systematic review of empirical evidence on the Dunning-Kruger effect. Communications in Information Literacy, 10(2), 3.

Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. J., Kemp, J. E., & Kalman, H. K. (2007). Designing effective instruction. New Jersey: Wiley.

NRC. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washinton, DC: National Academies Press.

ORourke, K., & Kahn, P. (2005). Understanding enquiry-based learning. In T. Barrett, I. Mac Labhrainn & H. Fallon (Eds.), Handbook of enquiry and problem-based learning; Irish case studies and international perspectives. Galway: AISHE and NUI Galway.

Ormrod, J. E., & Davis, K. M. (2004). Human learning. London: Merrill

Osguthorpe, R. T., & Graham, C. R. (2003). Blended Learning Environments Definitions and Directions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(227-233).

Oweis, T. I. (2018). Effects of Using a Blended Learning Method on Students Achievement and Motivation to Learn English in Jordan: A Pilot Case Study. Education Research International, 2018.

Parsazadeh, N., Ali, R., & Saeed, I. I. R. (2015). Digital information evaluation skills among students in higher education. Jurnal Teknologi, 75(11).

Roblyer, M. D. (2015). An introduction to systematc instructional design for traditional, online, and blended environments: essential steps and strategies to plan instruction for traditional, online, and blended classrooms. New Jersey: Pearson.

Rosman, T., Mayer, A.-K., & Krampen, G. (2016). A longitudinal study on information-seeking knowledge in psychology undergraduates: Exploring the role of information literacy instruction and working memory capacity. Computers & Education, 96, 94-108.

Saunders, L. (2013). Culture and collaboration: Fostering integration of information literacy by speaking the language of faculty. Paper presented at the Association of College and Research Libraries National Conference.

SCONUL. (2011). The SCONUL seven pillars of information literacy: Core model for higher education. London: Society of College, National and University Libraries Working Group on Information Literacy.

Shao, X., & Purpur, G. (2016). Effects of information literacy skills on student writing and course performance. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(6), 670-678.

Slavin, R. E. (2006). Educational psychology: Theory and practice. Boston: Pearson.

Sylvester, C. (2015). More questions than answers? A review of the effectiveness of inquiry based learning in higher education. The Journal of Commonwealth Law and Legal Education, 10(1), 21-29.

Tessmer, M. (1993). Planning and conducting formative evaluations. Oxon: Routledge.

Thorne, K. (2003). Blended learning: how to integrate online & traditional learning. London: Kogan Page Publishers.

Travis, T. A. (2017). From the classroom to the boardroom: The impact of information literacy instruction on workplace research skills. Education Libraries, 34(2), 19-31.

Walsh, J. (2015). Information literacy instruction: Selecting an effective model. Cambridge: Chandos Publication.

Welsh, T., & Wright, M. (2010). Information literacy in the digital age: An evidence-based approach. Cambridge: Chandos Publishing.

Woolf, B. P. (2009). Building Intelligent Interactive Tutors: Student-Centered Strategies for Revolutionizing E-Learning. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann.

Downloads

Published

2020-02-05

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 8 (2019): December 2019

Section

Articles

License

Please find the rights and licenses in International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies (IJEVS)

1. License

The article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

2. Authors Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).

3. User Rights

IJEVS's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, IJEVS permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work. Users will also need to attribute authors and IJEVS on distributing works in the journal.

4. Rights of Authors

Authors retain the following rights:

  • Copyright, and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
  • The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books,
  • The right to self-archive the article,
  • the right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies).

5. Co-Authorship

If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.

6. Termination

This agreement can be terminated by the author or IJEVS upon two months notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating partys notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of IJEVS. 

7. Royalties

This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by IJEVS or its sublicensee.

8. Miscellaneous

IJEVS will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the articles editorial process is successfully completed and IJEVS or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. IJEVS may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers.