Evaluation of 2013 Curriculum Implementation in The Achievement of Gradical Competency Standars in Mathematic About Mathematics Literation in SMAN 1 Menganti Gresik

Authors

  • Gilang Ilham Fitriyanto State University of Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v2i2.2138

Keywords:

Evaluation of 2013 Curriculum, Mathematics literacy

Abstract

This study aims to determine the impact of the implementation of the 2013 curriculum on education units and the achievement of graduate competency standards for each student in the education unit and identify the impact and constraints of the implementation of the 2013 curriculum in mathematics and mathematics literacy related to translating story sentences in mathematical symbols and sentences, write down, and translate questions.

This evaluation study uses a countenance stake model with a quantitative approach. The method used is documentation, observation and questionnaire or questionnaire. Evaluation research subjects are 3 mathematics teachers and 34-35 samples of class XI students with curriculum object research documents, teacher documents, mathematics literacy skills and mathematics learning implementation in 2013 curriculum.

 The results showed the principle of curriculum development and curriculum components of SMAN 1 Menganti getting an average score of 100, component compilation of teacher documents amounting to 78, 25, implementation of 2013 curriculum learning mathematics subjects getting an average score of 79, 2013 curriculum authentic evaluation of the teacher's eyes lessons of 68.57, mathematical literacy skills obtained an average score of 70.

 Based on the results of the 2013 curriculum evaluation research at SMAN 1 Menganti, it can be concluded that the development and components of the 2013 curriculum have met the standards and refer to the graduate competency standards (SKL) but still need to improve teacher competencies, especially mathematics teachers and improve students' mathematical literacy abilities.

References

Abidin, Mulyati. (2018). Pembelajaran Literasi: Strategi Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Matematika, Sains, Membaca, dan Menulis. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Arifin. (2012). Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Creswell. (2016). Research Design: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Campuran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Einika, Azka. (2018). De Fermat: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. Menyambut PISA 2018: Pengembangan Literasi Matematika Untuk Mendukung Kecakapan Abad 21, 01-01.

Fisher, Williams. (2009). Unlocking Creativity: Teaching Across the Curriculum. London: David Fulton Publishers Ltd.

Hamalik, Oemar. (2012). Manajemen Pengembangan Kurikulum. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Hamid, Hasan. (2009). Evaluasi Kurikulum. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Hiyatullah, Furqon. (2014, Oktober 19). 8 Masalah Dalam Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Retrieved from Metro TV News: http://news.metrotvnews.com/read/2014/10/19/307023

Ilham, Gilang. (2017). Jurnal Mahasiswa UNESA . Evaluasi Implementasi Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan Di MI Plus Riyadlatul Athfal Hulaan Menganti Gresik, 08-01.

Kemendikbud. (2013). Dokumen Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Kemendikbud. (2017). Panduan Gerakan Literasi Nasional. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Kemendikbud. (2017). PISA Programme for International Student Assessment. Retrieved from Puspendik Kemendikbud: https://puspendik.kemdikbud.go.id/seminar/index.php?folder=Sosialisasi %20PISA%202018

Lilienfeld. (2011). Psychology: From Inquiry to Understanding. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Mathematics, N. C. (1991). Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics. Reston: VA:NCTM.

Moelenda, Januszewski. (2008). Educational Technology. New York: Lawrence Erlbum Associates.

Muhammad, Nuh. (2013, Januari 21). Dinas Pendidikan Gresik Siap Awali Kurikulum 2013. Retrieved from Kompas: http://lifestyle.kompas.com/read/2013/01/21/04560128/dinas.pendidikan.gresik.siap.awali.kurikulum.2013

Mulyasa. (2002). Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi, Konsep Karakteristik, dan Implementasi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyasa. (2017). Pengembangan dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Curriculum and Evaluation Standard for Teaching Mathematics. Reston: VA:NCTM.

OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 Result: What Students Know and Can Do Volume I. Kanada: OECD.

OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Assesment and Analytical Framework. Kanada: OECD.

OECD. (2016). PISA 2015: Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Sciene, and Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. Kanada: OECD.

OECD. (2016). PISA 2018 Draft Analytical Framework May 2016. Paris: OECD.

OECD. (2016). PISA 2018 Integrated Design. Paris: OECD.

Ricchey, Barbara. (1994). Teknologi Pembelajaran: Definisi dan Kawasanya. Washington DC: AECT.

Sanjaya, Wina. (2008). Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Schiro, Michael. (2017). Teori Kurikulum: Visi-Visi Yang Saling Bertentangan dan Kekhawatiran Tanpa Henti. Jakarta: PT. Indeks.

Siti, Juliantari. (2013, April 9). Kurikulum 2013, Untuk Siapa? Retrieved from Indonesia Corruption Watch: http://antikorupsi.org/en/news/kurikulum-2013-untuk-siapa

Stake, R. (1973). Program Evaluation Particularly Responsive Evaluation. New Trends in Evaluation. Goteborg, Sweden: Conference New Trends in Evaluation.

Stobaugh. (2013). Assering Critical Thinking in Middle and High Schools: Meeting in the Common Core. New York: Routledge.

Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Evaluasi: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Kombinasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suharsimi, Arikunto. (2014). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan: Pedoman Teoritis Praktis Bagi Mahasiswa Praktisi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Suryaningrum, Lilis. (2015). Jurnal Mahasiswa UNESA . Pelaksanaan Supervisi Kepala Sekolah Dalam Implementasi Kurikulum 2013, 2.

Wamendikbud. (2014, Januari 14). Press Workshop Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Retrieved from Kemendikbud: http://kemendikbud.go.id/paparan

Weisberg. (2006). Creativity: Understanding Innovation in Problem Solving, Science, Invention, and the Arts. Kanada: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Published

2020-02-28

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2020): February 2020

Section

Articles

License

Please find the rights and licenses in International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies (IJEVS)

1. License

The article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

2. Authors Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).

3. User Rights

IJEVS's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, IJEVS permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work. Users will also need to attribute authors and IJEVS on distributing works in the journal.

4. Rights of Authors

Authors retain the following rights:

  • Copyright, and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
  • The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books,
  • The right to self-archive the article,
  • the right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies).

5. Co-Authorship

If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.

6. Termination

This agreement can be terminated by the author or IJEVS upon two months notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating partys notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of IJEVS. 

7. Royalties

This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by IJEVS or its sublicensee.

8. Miscellaneous

IJEVS will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the articles editorial process is successfully completed and IJEVS or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. IJEVS may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers.