Evaluation of 2013 Curriculum Implementation in The Achievement of Gradical Competency Standars in Mathematic About Mathematics Literation in SMAN 1 Menganti Gresik

Gilang Ilham Fitriyanto

Abstract


This study aims to determine the impact of the implementation of the 2013 curriculum on education units and the achievement of graduate competency standards for each student in the education unit and identify the impact and constraints of the implementation of the 2013 curriculum in mathematics and mathematics literacy related to translating story sentences in mathematical symbols and sentences, write down, and translate questions.

This evaluation study uses a countenance stake model with a quantitative approach. The method used is documentation, observation and questionnaire or questionnaire. Evaluation research subjects are 3 mathematics teachers and 34-35 samples of class XI students with curriculum object research documents, teacher documents, mathematics literacy skills and mathematics learning implementation in 2013 curriculum.

 The results showed the principle of curriculum development and curriculum components of SMAN 1 Menganti getting an average score of 100, component compilation of teacher documents amounting to 78, 25, implementation of 2013 curriculum learning mathematics subjects getting an average score of 79, 2013 curriculum authentic evaluation of the teacher's eyes lessons of 68.57, mathematical literacy skills obtained an average score of 70.

 Based on the results of the 2013 curriculum evaluation research at SMAN 1 Menganti, it can be concluded that the development and components of the 2013 curriculum have met the standards and refer to the graduate competency standards (SKL) but still need to improve teacher competencies, especially mathematics teachers and improve students' mathematical literacy abilities.


Keywords


Evaluation of 2013 Curriculum, Mathematics literacy

References


Abidin, Mulyati. (2018). Pembelajaran Literasi: Strategi Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Matematika, Sains, Membaca, dan Menulis. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Arifin. (2012). Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Creswell. (2016). Research Design: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Campuran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Einika, Azka. (2018). De Fermat: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. Menyambut PISA 2018: Pengembangan Literasi Matematika Untuk Mendukung Kecakapan Abad 21, 01-01.

Fisher, Williams. (2009). Unlocking Creativity: Teaching Across the Curriculum. London: David Fulton Publishers Ltd.

Hamalik, Oemar. (2012). Manajemen Pengembangan Kurikulum. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Hamid, Hasan. (2009). Evaluasi Kurikulum. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Hiyatullah, Furqon. (2014, Oktober 19). 8 Masalah Dalam Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Retrieved from Metro TV News: http://news.metrotvnews.com/read/2014/10/19/307023

Ilham, Gilang. (2017). Jurnal Mahasiswa UNESA . Evaluasi Implementasi Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan Di MI Plus Riyadlatul Athfal Hulaan Menganti Gresik, 08-01.

Kemendikbud. (2013). Dokumen Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Kemendikbud. (2017). Panduan Gerakan Literasi Nasional. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Kemendikbud. (2017). PISA Programme for International Student Assessment. Retrieved from Puspendik Kemendikbud: https://puspendik.kemdikbud.go.id/seminar/index.php?folder=Sosialisasi %20PISA%202018

Lilienfeld. (2011). Psychology: From Inquiry to Understanding. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Mathematics, N. C. (1991). Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics. Reston: VA:NCTM.

Moelenda, Januszewski. (2008). Educational Technology. New York: Lawrence Erlbum Associates.

Muhammad, Nuh. (2013, Januari 21). Dinas Pendidikan Gresik Siap Awali Kurikulum 2013. Retrieved from Kompas: http://lifestyle.kompas.com/read/2013/01/21/04560128/dinas.pendidikan.gresik.siap.awali.kurikulum.2013

Mulyasa. (2002). Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi, Konsep Karakteristik, dan Implementasi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyasa. (2017). Pengembangan dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Curriculum and Evaluation Standard for Teaching Mathematics. Reston: VA:NCTM.

OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 Result: What Students Know and Can Do Volume I. Kanada: OECD.

OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Assesment and Analytical Framework. Kanada: OECD.

OECD. (2016). PISA 2015: Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Sciene, and Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. Kanada: OECD.

OECD. (2016). PISA 2018 Draft Analytical Framework May 2016. Paris: OECD.

OECD. (2016). PISA 2018 Integrated Design. Paris: OECD.

Ricchey, Barbara. (1994). Teknologi Pembelajaran: Definisi dan Kawasanya. Washington DC: AECT.

Sanjaya, Wina. (2008). Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Schiro, Michael. (2017). Teori Kurikulum: Visi-Visi Yang Saling Bertentangan dan Kekhawatiran Tanpa Henti. Jakarta: PT. Indeks.

Siti, Juliantari. (2013, April 9). Kurikulum 2013, Untuk Siapa? Retrieved from Indonesia Corruption Watch: http://antikorupsi.org/en/news/kurikulum-2013-untuk-siapa

Stake, R. (1973). Program Evaluation Particularly Responsive Evaluation. New Trends in Evaluation. Goteborg, Sweden: Conference New Trends in Evaluation.

Stobaugh. (2013). Assering Critical Thinking in Middle and High Schools: Meeting in the Common Core. New York: Routledge.

Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Evaluasi: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Kombinasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suharsimi, Arikunto. (2014). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan: Pedoman Teoritis Praktis Bagi Mahasiswa Praktisi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Suryaningrum, Lilis. (2015). Jurnal Mahasiswa UNESA . Pelaksanaan Supervisi Kepala Sekolah Dalam Implementasi Kurikulum 2013, 2.

Wamendikbud. (2014, Januari 14). Press Workshop Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Retrieved from Kemendikbud: http://kemendikbud.go.id/paparan

Weisberg. (2006). Creativity: Understanding Innovation in Problem Solving, Science, Invention, and the Arts. Kanada: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v2i2.2138

Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 138 times

Refbacks



Copyright (c) 2020 Gilang Ilham Fitriyanto

International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies (IJEVS)

E-ISSN : 2684-6950