A METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR VISUAL COMFORT ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATIONAL SPACES

Authors

  • Hazim Seder Faculty of Engineering, Lincoln University College, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Janani Selvam Faculty of Engineering, Lincoln University College, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Najib Taher Ahmed Al-Ashwal Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai 81310, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29103/arj.v13i1.25248

Keywords:

daylighting, educational buildings, glare, illuminance, visual comfort

Abstract

Visual comfort is a critical component of indoor environmental quality in schools, where lighting conditions influence visual performance, attention, and perceived well-being. In dense urban fabrics and semi-arid climates, classrooms often face a dual constraint: limited effective daylight use due to glare, privacy, and noise, alongside over-reliance on inadequately tuned electric lighting. This paper proposes a structured methodological framework for assessing visual comfort through an integrated workflow that combines field-based diagnostics (spot illuminance measurements and photographic documentation), occupant feedback, and simulation-based illustration using DIALux Evo. An illustrative, case-based application in public schools in Hebron City (Palestine) demonstrates how the framework supports interpretive understanding of recurring conditions, such as uneven illuminance distribution and potential glare-related situations, using standards (e.g., EN 12464-1) as non-evaluative reference points. The study does not claim performance compliance, certification, or predictive validation. It outlines how AI-assisted decision support may be incorporated in future work to enable scalable early-stage assessments across classroom typologies.

References

[1] M. Kraus and I. J. Senitkova, “Indoor environmental quality determinants in the buildings,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, IOP Publishing Ltd, Dec. 2020. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/960/4/042092.

[2] T. Rus, D. Beu, and C. Ciugudeanu, “THE IMPACT OF THE INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ON STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE,” in GEOLINKS Conference Proceedings, Saima Consult Ltd, 2021, pp. 51–61. doi: 10.32008/geolinks2021/b1/v3/05.

[3] N. T. Al-Ashwal and A. S. Hassan, “Estimation of energy savings due to the integration of daylight with artificial lighting in classrooms,” Adv. Sci. Lett., vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 6140–6143, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1166/asl.2017.9223.

[4] D. Licina, P. Wargocki, C. Pyke, and S. Altomonte, “The future of IEQ in green building certifications,” Buildings and Cities, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 907–927, 2021, doi: 10.5334/bc.148.

[5] S. Altomonte, P. Rutherford, and R. Wilson, “Indoor Environmental Quality: Lighting and Acoustics,” in Encyclopedia of Sustainable Technologies, M. A. Abraham, Ed., Oxford: Elsevier, 2017, pp. 221–229. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.10196-4.

[6] Ibrahim Al-Sulaihi, Khalid Al-Gahtani, Abdullah Alsugair, and Ibrahim Tijani, “Assessing Indoor Environmental Quality of Educational Buildings Using BIM,” Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering B, vol. 4, no. 8, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.17265/2162-5263/2015.08.006.

[7] W. Labib, H. Sirror, E. S. Abowardah, and W. Metwally, “Effect of Indoor Environmental Quality on Work Productivity in Educational Buildings: A Review.,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Institute of Physics, 2022. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1026/1/012057.

[8] S. K. Purushothaman, J. Selvam, and V. Muthunarayanan, “Ambient indoor air pollution and its consecutive effect on environment materials and health,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 37, no. Part 2, pp. 504–508, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.MATPR.2020.05.483.

[9] P. Dhayal and B. Jha, “Indoor Visual Comfort: A Review of Factors and Assessments,” 2023, Center for Cities, University of Moratuwa. doi: 10.61275/ISVSEJ-2023-10-11-03.

[10] N. T. Al-Ashwal and A. S. Hassan, “The Impact Of Daylighting-Artificiel Lighting Integration on Building Occupant’s Health and Performance,” International Journal Transaction Journal of Engineering Management & Applied Sciences & Technologies, vol. 9, pp. 97–105, 2018.

[11] A. Baba, I. Shahrour, and M. Baba, “Indoor Environmental Quality for Comfort Learning Environments: Case Study of Palestinian School Buildings,” Buildings, vol. 14, no. 5, May 2024, doi: 10.3390/BUILDINGS14051296.

[12] UN-Habitat, “PROFILE FOR THE STATE OF Palestine,” United Nations Human Settlements Programme, 2017.

[13] N. Z. Ministry of Education, “Designing Quality Learning Spaces-Lighting and Visual Comfort Designing Quality Learning Spaces (DQLS) Lighting and Visual Comfort,” 2020.

[14] S. Aghajari and C.-C. Chen, “Optimizing Classroom Lighting for Enhanced Visual Comfort and Reduced Energy Consumption,” Buildings, vol. 15, no. 8, p. 1233, 2025.

[15] C. V. Magero, J. Nyamari, and R. Mutisya, “Visual Comfort and Discomfort in Public Boarding Secondary Schools in Nairobi City County, Kenya,” East African Journal of Health and Science, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 62–84, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.37284/eajhs.6.1.1123.

Downloads

Published

31-03-2026

How to Cite

[1]
H. Seder, J. Selvam, and N. Al-Ashwal, “A METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR VISUAL COMFORT ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATIONAL SPACES”, ARJ, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Mar. 2026.

Issue

Section

Articles