Analisis Jaringan Komunikasi Interpersonal Kelompok Tani dalam Koordinasi Penggunaan Combine Harvester di Pidoli Lombang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29103/ag.v11i1.26576Keywords:
Combine harvester, communication network centrality, farmer group, interpersonal communication, social network analysisAbstract
This study examines the interpersonal communication network of farmer groups in coordinating the use of combine harvesters for rice harvesting in Pidoli Lombang Village Panyabungan Subdistrict Mandailing Natal Regency. The research focuses on two farmer groups Willem Iskander and Biara Dagang with a total of 60 farmer respondents. The study applies a descriptive quantitative approach using Social Network Analysis SNA. Primary data were collected through a survey and sociometric questions to construct an actor to actor communication matrix then analyzed using UCINET VI and visualized with NetDraw. The analysis focuses on outdegree indegree closeness and betweenness centrality to identify key actors and information flow patterns related to harvest scheduling field rotation cost agreement and operator assignment. The results show that in the Willem Iskander farmer group actor NS holds the most strategic position as an information disseminator a main reference and a communication broker as indicated by outdegree 0.207 indegree 0.62 closeness 1.97 and betweenness 8.72. In the Biara Dagang farmer group dissemination and brokerage roles are more distributed across several members with the highest outdegree for PL 0.76 the main reference for PN 0.62 the highest closeness for AK 1.95 and a prominent brokerage role for KH 3.27. In conclusion the communication network structure in Pidoli Lombang forms central actors who shape the speed and direction of coordination in combine harvester use so strengthening the capacity of key actors may improve the effectiveness of harvest mechanization at the local level.
References
Aditya, R., Rahman, M., & Kusuma, H. (2024). Social network analysis in agricultural knowledge exchange among farmers. Journal of Rural Studies, 107, 103213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103213
Anggreny, S., Sumardjo, S., Lubis, D. P., & Syahyuti. (2025). Strengthening farmer institutional networks through stakeholder communication to foster farmers’ economic institutions. Jurnal Penyuluhan, 21(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.51852/jpp.v21i1.1071
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.
Fischer, E., & Qaim, M. (2023). Linking farmers to markets and knowledge networks for innovation adoption. World Development, 164, 106168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106168
Guerrero-Ocampo, S. B., & Díaz-Puente, J. M. (2023). Social network analysis uses and contributions to innovation initiatives in rural areas: A review. Sustainability, 15(18), 14018. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151814018
Isaac, M. E., Erickson, B., & Quashie-Sam, S. J. (2024). Farmer knowledge networks and social learning in agricultural systems. Agricultural Systems, 219, 103940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2024.103940
Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2024). Information diffusion and farmer communication networks in agricultural communities. Agricultural Systems, 219, 103936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2024.103936
Klerkx, L., Jakku, E., & Labarthe, P. (2024). A review of agricultural innovation systems and knowledge brokers. Global Food Security, 41, 100759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2024.100759
Matous, P., Silaen, P., & Sunaryanto, A. (2024). Hub-and-spoke social networks among Indonesian cocoa farmers homogenise farming practices. People and Nature. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10578
Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Pearson Education.
Park, J., Kim, H., & Shin, D. (2024). Social influence and knowledge exchange in farmer networks. Agriculture and Human Values, 41(2), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-023-10482-7
Qin, Y., Chen, Y., & Zhang, X. (2024). Network centrality and information diffusion in agricultural communities. Agricultural Systems, 221, 103995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2024.103995
Rahman, I., Siregar, H., & Ananda, P. (2023). Adaptasi Teknologi Tepat Guna untuk Energi Terbarukan di Daerah Terpencil. Jurnal Teknologi Masyarakat, 5(4), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.55991/jtm.2023.054121
Rahman, M. S., Hossain, M. A., & Sarker, M. R. (2023). Social interaction and agricultural technology adoption among smallholder farmers. Agricultural Systems, 208, 103662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103662
Scott, J. (2017). Social Network Analysis. SAGE Publications.
Spielman, D. J., Davis, K., & Negash, M. (2023a). Agricultural innovation systems and farmer knowledge networks: Implications for technology diffusion. Food Policy, 115, 102430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102430
Spielman, D. J., Davis, K., & Negash, M. (2023b). Agricultural innovation systems and farmer knowledge networks. Food Policy, 115, 102430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102430
Sujan, M. H. K., Sarker, M. R., Sarkar, M. A. R., Sultana, M., Rahman, M. S., Ahammad, S., & Khan, M. K. (2025). Harnessing rice combine harvester adoption for sustainable agriculture in wetland ecosystems. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 69(2), 456–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.70055
Susanti, E., Safrida, S., Nabila, N. P., & Iskandar, E. (2024). The adoption of combine harvester and its determinant factors for sustainable rice production in Aceh Besar District, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1290(1), 12052. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1290/1/012052
Valente, T. W., & Palinkas, L. A. (2023). Social network analysis for diffusion of innovations in communities. Social Networks, 72, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2023.01.002
Valente, T. W., Palinkas, L. A., Czaja, S., Chu, K. H., & Brown, C. H. (2023). Social network analysis for program implementation and diffusion of innovations. Social Networks, 72, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2023.01.002
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press.
Widayat, Y. Y., Karlina, N., Munajat, M. D. E., & Ningrum, S. (2023). Mapping policy actors using social network analysis on integrated urban farming programs. Sustainability, 15(12), 9612. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129612
Winarno, K., Sustiyo, J., Abdul Aziz, A., & Permani, R. (2025). Unlocking agricultural mechanisation potential in Indonesia: Barriers, drivers, and pathways for sustainable agri-food systems. Agricultural Systems, 226, 104305.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104305
Zhang, J., & Li, S. (2024). Decoding rural connections: Social network analysis in rural communities and agricultural innovation. China Journal of Population, Resources and Environment, 22(2), 145–156.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjpre.2024.11.013
Zhang, X., Li, H., Chen, Y., & Wu, J. (2024). Acceptance of new agricultural technology among small rural farmers: A UTAUT perspective. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 431. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04163-2
Zhang, Y., Liu, Q., & Chen, X. (2023). Network brokerage and innovation diffusion in rural agribusiness communities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 193, 122623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122623
Zhuhuri, M., Rahman, M., & Hasan, S. (2023). Network structure and knowledge exchange among farmer groups. Agriculture, 13(11), 2075. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13112075
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rony Rahmat Hidayat Hasibuan, Utari, Putra Kurniawan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication and this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this journal.
All articles in this journal may be disseminated by listing valid sources and the title of the article should not be omitted. The content of the article is liable to the author.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
In the dissemination of articles by the author must declare the Agrifo: Jurnal Agribisnis Universitas Malikussaleh as the first party to publish the article.







