Resiliensi Anak dalam Keluarga Sosial: Kondisi Psikososial dan Pembentukan Kekerabatan di SOS Children’s Village Banda Aceh

Authors

  • Rika Dewi Akademi Kebidanan Saleha Banda Aceh, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29103/aaj.v10i1.27628

Keywords:

Alternative Care, Child Resilience, Family-Like Care, Social Kinship, SOS Children’s Village

Abstract

Children living apart from their biological families may experience psychological and social challenges that require supportive alternative care. This study describes psychosocial indicators associated with children’s resilience in the family-like care setting of SOS Children’s Village Banda Aceh and interprets them through an anthropological perspective on kinship. The study employed a descriptive quantitative design involving 65 children who were active residents of the care program and were included through total sampling. Data were collected through questionnaires, observation, and supporting interviews with caregivers and were analyzed using univariate frequencies and percentages. The findings showed that 55 children (84.6%) were of school age. Observations indicated that school-age children were accustomed to independently managing routine daily activities. Fifteen children (23.1%) demonstrated prosocial behavior, 11 (16.9%) confidently expressed their future aspirations, six (9.2%) showed limited confidence in discussing their aspirations, and three (4.6%) displayed emotional distress related to the absence of their biological parents. All children participated in religious activities. Observational and interview data indicated that shared routines, reciprocal assistance, caregiving relationships, and collective religious practices were interpreted as supporting the formation of social kinship and a sense of belonging. These relationships, however, did not entirely replace emotional attachments to biological families. Children’s resilience in family-like alternative care should therefore be understood as a relational and sociocultural process that may coexist with emotional vulnerability.

Abstrak: Anak yang tidak tinggal bersama keluarga biologis dapat menghadapi tantangan psikologis dan sosial yang memerlukan dukungan pengasuhan alternatif. Penelitian ini bertujuan menggambarkan indikator psikososial yang berkaitan dengan resiliensi anak dalam keluarga sosial di SOS Children’s Village Banda Aceh serta menafsirkannya melalui perspektif antropologi kekerabatan. Penelitian menggunakan desain deskriptif kuantitatif dengan melibatkan 65 anak aktif yang dipilih melalui teknik total sampling. Data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner, observasi, dan wawancara pendukung dengan ibu asuh, kemudian dianalisis secara univariat dalam bentuk frekuensi dan persentase. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa 55 anak (84,6%) berada pada usia sekolah. Hasil observasi menunjukkan bahwa anak usia sekolah terbiasa menjalankan aktivitas rutin sehari-hari secara mandiri. Sebanyak 15 anak (23,1%) menunjukkan perilaku prososial, 11 anak (16,9%) mampu menyampaikan cita-cita dengan percaya diri, enam anak (9,2%) menunjukkan kurangnya kepercayaan diri, dan tiga anak (4,6%) memperlihatkan distres emosional terkait ketidakhadiran orang tua kandung. Seluruh anak berpartisipasi dalam kegiatan keagamaan. Temuan observasi dan wawancara menunjukkan bahwa rutinitas bersama, pertukaran bantuan, hubungan pengasuhan, dan kegiatan keagamaan kolektif dapat dipahami sebagai praktik yang mendukung pembentukan kekerabatan sosial dan rasa memiliki. Namun, hubungan tersebut tidak sepenuhnya menggantikan keterikatan emosional dengan keluarga biologis. Resiliensi anak dalam pengasuhan alternatif berbasis keluarga karena itu perlu dipahami sebagai proses relasional dan sosial-budaya yang dapat berjalan berdampingan dengan kerentanan emosional.

References

Gayapersad, A., Ombok, C., Kamanda, A., Tarus, C., Ayuku, D., & Braitstein, P. (2019). The production and reproduction of kinship in charitable children’s institutions in Uasin Gishu County, Kenya. Child & Youth Care Forum, 48, 797–828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-019-09506-8

Goldfarb, K. E. (2016). “Coming to look alike”: Materializing affinity in Japanese foster and adoptive care. Social Analysis, 60(2), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2016.600204

Howard, A. H., Roberts, M., Mitchell, T., & Wilke, N. G. (2023). The relationship between spirituality and resilience and well-being: A study of 529 care leavers from 11 nations. Adversity and Resilience Science, 4(2), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42844-023-00088-y

Howell, S. (2003). Kinning: The creation of life trajectories in transnational adoptive families. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 9(3), 465–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00159

Howell, S. (2009). Adoption of the unrelated child: Some challenges to the anthropological study of kinship. Annual Review of Anthropology, 38, 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085115

Leinaweaver, J. B. (2014). Informal kinship-based fostering around the world: Anthropological findings. Child Development Perspectives, 8(3), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12075

Lou, Y., Taylor, E. P., & Di Folco, S. (2018). Resilience and resilience factors in children in residential care: A systematic review. Children and Youth Services Review, 89, 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.04.010

Luthar, S. S., Crossman, E. J., & Small, P. J. (2015). Resilience and adversity. In R. M. Lerner (Editor-in-Chief) & M. E. Lamb (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Vol. 3. Socioemotional processes (7th ed., pp. 247–286). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy307

Malindi, M. J., & Hay, J. (2023). Resilience anchors for children in an out-of-home care institution during and after COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1189739. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1189739

Masten, A. S. (2018). Resilience theory and research on children and families: Past, present, and promise. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 10(1), 12–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12255

Masten, A. S., & Motti-Stefanidi, F. (2020). Multisystem resilience for children and youth in disaster: Reflections in the context of COVID-19. Adversity and Resilience Science, 1(2), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42844-020-00010-w

McLaren, H., & Qonita, N. (2020). Indonesia’s orphanage trade: Islamic philanthropy’s good intentions, some not so good outcomes. Religions, 11(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11010001

Parry, S., Cox, N., Andriopoulou, P., Oldfield, J., Roscoe, S., Palumbo-Haswell, J., & Collins, S. (2023). Mechanisms to enhance resilience and post-traumatic growth in residential care: A narrative review. Adversity and Resilience Science, 4(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42844-022-00074-w

Shuttleworth, P. D. (2023). Recognition of family life by children living in kinship care arrangements in England. The British Journal of Social Work, 53(1), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcac114

Skoglund, J., Thørnblad, R., & Holtan, A. (2024). The meaning of biology in the foster family narratives of young adults. Nordic Social Work Research, 14(1), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2022.2155216

SOS Children’s Villages Indonesia. (n.d.). Tentang SOS Children’s Villages. Retrieved July 17, 2026, from https://www.sos.or.id/tentang-sos

Stojanović, A., & Rezo Bagarić, I. (2024). “Pushing forward”: Resilience of youth from alternative care in Croatia. European Journal of Social Work, 27(6), 1166–1177. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2024.2306381

Theron, L. (2023). Resilience of sub-Saharan children and adolescents: A scoping review. Transcultural Psychiatry, 60(6), 1017–1039. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461520938916

Thompson, R. A. (2016). Early attachment and later development: Reframing the questions. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (3rd ed., pp. 330–348). Guilford Press.

Ungar, M. (2008). Resilience across cultures. The British Journal of Social Work, 38(2), 218–235. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcl343

Ungar, M. (2021). Modeling multisystemic resilience: Connecting biological, psychological, social, and ecological adaptation in contexts of adversity. In M. Ungar (Ed.), Multisystemic resilience: Adaptation and transformation in contexts of change (pp. 6–32). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190095888.003.0002

Vignato, S. (2012). Devices of oblivion: How Islamic schools rescue “orphaned” children from traumatic experiences in Aceh (Indonesia). South East Asia Research, 20(2), 239–261. https://doi.org/10.5367/sear.2012.0107

Wahyuni, P., & Zainuddin, N. (2024). Islamic parenting methods to increase resilience capability in foster children at Bina Insani Orphanage, Moyudan, Sleman, Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Education and Ethics, 2(2), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.18196/jiee.v2i2.50

Westerlaken, R. (2024). Kinship care disruptions and child institutionalisation in Bali, Indonesia: A qualitative study. Institutionalised Children Explorations and Beyond, 11(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/23493003241255192

Wu, Q., Xu, Y., Pei, F., & Lim, N. (2023). Strength and resilience for kinship caregivers raising children: A scoping review. Societies, 13(12), Article 249. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13120249

Wulleman, L., Grietens, H., Noens, I., & Vliegen, N. (2023). (Re)defining family: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of foster children’s views of family in non-kinship foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 155, Article 107184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107184

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Dewi, R. (2026). Resiliensi Anak dalam Keluarga Sosial: Kondisi Psikososial dan Pembentukan Kekerabatan di SOS Children’s Village Banda Aceh. Aceh Anthropological Journal, 10(1), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.29103/aaj.v10i1.27628

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.