Representasi Aspirasi Daerah dalam Koordinasi DPD RI dan Pemerintah Daerah Provinsi Bengkulu

Authors

  • Farida Nur Aini Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu, Indonesia
  • Susiyanto Susiyanto Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu, Indonesia
  • Eni Khairani Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu, Indonesia
  • Novella Firsty Putri Diantra Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29103/aaj.v10i1.27238

Keywords:

aspirasi daerah, DPD RI, pemerintah daerah, koordinasi, pembangunan Bengkulu

Abstract

This article analyzes the effectiveness of coordination between members of the Regional Representative Council of the Republic of Indonesia (DPD RI) from Bengkulu Province and the Bengkulu Provincial Government in advocating community aspirations for regional development. The study is based on the unclear working mechanism between DPD RI as a regional representative institution at the national level and the provincial government as the administrator of regional autonomy. From a socio-anthropological perspective, regional aspirations are understood not merely as administrative proposals, but also as expressions of local interests, experiences of development inequality, and demands for recognition within central–local relations. This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach through in-depth interviews, observation, and document analysis. The informants include a DPD RI member from Bengkulu Province, the Head of the DPD RI Representative Office in Bengkulu, the Regional Secretary of Bengkulu Province, and community figures. The analysis focuses on three coordination mechanisms: mutual adjustment, direct supervision, and the standardization of procedures, outputs, and skills. The findings show that coordination has taken place through formal and informal communication, particularly in the aspiration-gathering stage. However, coordination remains ineffective in the stage of advocating these aspirations to the central government because there is no standard operating procedure governing joint work mechanisms. This article emphasizes the need to institutionalize coordination so that regional aspirations do not stop at the collection stage but are systematically advocated through national policy processes.

Abstrak: Artikel ini menganalisis efektivitas koordinasi antara Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Republik Indonesia (DPD RI) Provinsi Bengkulu dan Pemerintah Daerah Provinsi Bengkulu dalam memperjuangkan aspirasi masyarakat untuk peningkatan pembangunan daerah. Kajian ini berangkat dari belum jelasnya mekanisme hubungan kerja antara DPD RI sebagai representasi daerah di tingkat nasional dan pemerintah daerah sebagai penyelenggara otonomi daerah. Dalam perspektif sosial-antropologis, aspirasi daerah tidak hanya dipahami sebagai daftar usulan administratif, tetapi juga sebagai ekspresi kepentingan lokal, pengalaman ketimpangan pembangunan, dan kebutuhan pengakuan dalam relasi pusat–daerah. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif melalui wawancara mendalam, observasi, dan telaah dokumen. Informan penelitian meliputi Anggota DPD RI Provinsi Bengkulu, Kepala Kantor Perwakilan DPD RI Provinsi Bengkulu, Sekretaris Daerah Provinsi Bengkulu, dan tokoh masyarakat. Analisis difokuskan pada tiga mekanisme koordinasi, yaitu saling mengingatkan, supervisi langsung, dan standardisasi prosedur, hasil, serta keterampilan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa koordinasi telah berlangsung melalui komunikasi formal dan informal, terutama dalam penjaringan aspirasi. Namun, koordinasi belum efektif pada tahap pengawalan aspirasi ke pemerintah pusat karena belum tersedia SOP yang mengatur pola kerja bersama. Artikel ini menegaskan pentingnya pelembagaan koordinasi agar aspirasi daerah tidak berhenti pada penjaringan, tetapi terkawal hingga proses kebijakan nasional.

References

Akbar, A., Flacke, J., Martinez, J., & van Maarseveen, M. F. A. M. (2020). Participatory planning practice in rural Indonesia: A sustainable development goals-based evaluation. Community Development, 51(3), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2020.1765822

Annahar, N., Widianingsih, I., Muhtar, E. A., & Paskarina, C. (2023). The road to inclusive decentralized village governance in Indonesia. Sustainability, 15(11), 8616. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118616

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

Bakar, S. N. (2010). Potret dan dinamika politik DPD RI dalam sistem ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia. Sekretariat DPD RI.

Brodjonegoro, B., & Asanuma, S. (2000). Regional autonomy and fiscal decentralization in democratic Indonesia. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 41(2), 111–122. https://scholar.ui.ac.id/en/publications/regional-autonomy-and-fiscal-decentralization-in-democratic-indon/

Creswell, J. W. (2015). Penelitian kualitatif dan desain riset: Memilih di antara lima pendekatan. Pustaka Pelajar.

Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011

Faiz, P. M., Isra, S., & Agustine, O. V. (2023). Strengthening Indonesia’s Regional Representative Council through judicial review by the Constitutional Court. SAGE Open, 13(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231204408

Fatimah, M., Haryanto, H., & Retnandari, N. D. (2024). Central-local government relations in regional planning and budgeting in Indonesia: Between autonomy and control. Policy & Governance Review, 8(2), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v8i2.922

Fitrani, F., Hofman, B., & Kaiser, K. (2005). Unity in diversity? The creation of new local governments in a decentralising Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 41(1), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074910500072690

Hadiz, V. R. (2004). Decentralization and democracy in Indonesia: A critique of neo-institutionalist perspectives. Development and Change, 35(4), 697–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0012-155X.2004.00376.x

Handoko, T. H. (1995). Manajemen (Edisi 2, Cet. 9). BPFE

Hardjo Soekarto, & Sudarsono. (2014). Pengkajian posting fungsi pengawasan DPD RI dalam Musrembang. Parlemen Pers.

Larkin, B. (2013). The politics and poetics of infrastructure. Annual Review of Anthropology, 42, 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155522

Mahi, B. R. (2010). Intergovernmental relations and decentralization in Indonesia: New arrangements and their impacts on local welfare. Economics and Finance in Indonesia, 58(2), 149–172. https://www.lpem.org/repec/lpe/efijnl/201007.pdf

Mardiasmo. (2002). Akuntansi sektor publik. Andi.

Mintzberg, H. (1989). Mintzberg on management: Inside our strange world of organizations. Free Press.

Ndraha, T. (2003). Kybernology: Ilmu pemerintahan baru. Rineka Cipta.

Pirmansyah, M. (2014). Eksistensi Dewan Perwakilan Daerah dalam sistem bikameral di Indonesia. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 2(1), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v1i1.1461

Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum015

Riyadi, & Bratakusumah, D. S. (2005). Perencanaan pembangunan daerah: Strategi menggali potensi dalam mewujudkan otonomi daerah. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Sekretariat Jenderal MPR. (2004). Dewan Perwakilan Daerah dalam sistem ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia. Sekretariat Jenderal MPR.

Smoke, P., & Lewis, B. D. (1996). Fiscal decentralization in Indonesia: A new approach to an old idea. World Development, 24(8), 1281–1299. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00042-3

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian administrasi dilengkapi dengan metode R&D. Alfabeta.

Sumaryadi, I. N. (2005). Efektivitas implementasi kebijakan otonomi daerah. Citra Utama.

Syaukani, H. R., Gaffar, A., & Rasyid, R. (2012). Otonomi daerah dalam negara kesatuan. Pustaka Pelajar.

Tukan, J. P. P., & ALW, L. T. (2018). DPD (Regional Representative Council), as a state agency of Indonesian state system, runs the authority of its role and function to create the existence of bicameral system in Indonesia. Diponegoro Law Review, 3(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.3.1.2018.64-74

Widjaja, H. A. W. (2014). Otonomi daerah dan daerah otonom. Rajawali Pers.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Aini, F. N., Susiyanto, S., Khairani, E., & Diantra, N. F. P. (2026). Representasi Aspirasi Daerah dalam Koordinasi DPD RI dan Pemerintah Daerah Provinsi Bengkulu. Aceh Anthropological Journal, 10(1), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.29103/aaj.v10i1.27238

Issue

Section

Articles