Differences of Visual, Auditorial, Kinesthetic Students in Understanding Mathematics Problems

Dwi Noviani Sulisawati, Lutfiyah Lutfiyah, Frida Murtinasari, Luzainiatus Sukma

Abstract


Characteristics of students who are diverse, such as different learning styles will also lead to the possibility of differences in students' ability to understand the learning material and every problem given, especially at the stage of understanding the problem given, because this stage is the most important step to determine the next problem-solving step. Therefore this study aims to reveal and illustrate how different characteristics of visual, audio and kinesthetic students in understanding problems. Data retrieval was done in class VIII of Arjasa 1 Junior High School with test methods, interviews, and questionnaires. Data were analyzed through stages of data reduction, analysis, and decision making. Furthermore, based on the data analysis that has been done, it can be concluded that there are differences in the characteristics of understanding problems for visual, auditory and kinesthetic students in terms of completeness and regularity of information writing, quantity of repetition of reading questions, marking important information and activity/movement habits done during the process of understanding the problem.

Keywords


Differences; Learning styles; Understanding; Mathematics Problems

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aljaberi, Nahil. M. (2015). University Students’ Learning Styles and Their Ability to Solve Mathematical Problems. International Journal of Business and Social Science, Vol.4, No.4(1), April 2015.

Anglin, K.L. (20104). Math Word Problem. USA: Wiley Publishing.

Awla, Hawkar Akram. (2014). Learning Styles and Their Relation to Teaching Styles. International Journal of Language and Linguistics 2014; 2(3): 241-245, doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20140203.23.

Barbe, W.B., Milone, M. N. (1981). What we Know about Modality Strengths. In Educational Leadership, 38 (5), 1981, pp. 378-380.

Bire, Arylien Ludji, Uda Geradus & Josua Bire. (2014). Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Visual, Auditorial, dan Kinestetik Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Kependidikan Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, Vol. 44, No. 2, November 2014.

DePorter, B dan Hernacki, M. (1992). Quantum Learning Membiasakan Belajar Nyaman dan Menyenangkan. Bandung: Kaifa Learning, pp 112.

DePorter, B dan Hernacki, M. (2016). Quantum Learning Membiasakan Belajar Nyaman dan Menyenangkan. Bandung: Kaifa Learning.

Dornyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Associates, Publishers.

Ghufron, M. N. & Risnawita, R. (2012). Gaya Belajar: Kajian Teoritik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Gilakjani, A.P., Ahmadi, S. M. (2011). The Effect of Visual, Auditory, and Kinaesthetic Learning Styles on Language Teaching. International Conference on Social Science and Humanity, IPEDR, Vol. 5 (2011), pp. 469-472. IACSIT Press, Singapore.

Huda, Miftahul. (2013). Model-Model Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran (Isu-Isu Metodis dan Paradigmatis), hal. 287-288. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Indrawati, Ristiana. (2017). Profil Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar. APOTEMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, Vol.3, No.2, Juli 2017, ISSN: 2407-8840, EISSN: 2580-9253.

Kaur, Berinderjeet. (1997). Difficulties with Problem Solving in Mathematics. Journal of The Mathematics Educator, 2(1), 93-112.

Keefe, J. W. (1979). Student Learning Styles: diagnosing and prescribing Programs. Reston, V.A.

Kharb, P., Prajna, PS, Manisha, J, Vishram, S. (2013). The

Learning Styles and the Preferred Teaching – Learning Strategies of First Year Medical Students. Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research, 7(6), 1089-1092, doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/5809.3090.

Lestari, K. E. & Yudhanegara, M. R. (2017). Penelitian Pendidikan matematika. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Mayer, R. E. (1998). Cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational aspects of problem solving. Instructional science, 26(1-2), 49-63.

Novriani, Milda R., Edy S. (2017). Analysis of Student Difficulties in Mathematics Problem Solving Ability at MTs Swara Ira Medan. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR) 2017, 33 (3), 63-75.

Nurkaeti, Nunuy. (2018). Polya’s Strategy: An Analysis of Mathematical Problem Solving Difficulty in 5th Grade Elementary School. Eduhumaniora: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, Vol. 10, No.2, Juli 2018 (140-147), p-ISSN2085-1234, e-ISSN 2579-5457.

Oxford, R. (2001). Language Learning Styles and Strategies. In. M. Celce-Murced, Ed. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (3 ed.). USA: Heinle & Heinle.

Siwi, Menik K., Yuhendri, L. V. (2016). Analysis Characteristics of Learning Styles VAK (Visual, Auditory, Kinesthetic) Student of Banks and Financial Institutions Course. International Conference on Education For Economics, Business, and Finance (ICEEBF), pp. 437-446.

Soancatl, V., Leon, A., Martinez, C., & Torres, L. (2010). Leading Students to Solve Math’s Problem Using Question-led Learning. Presented in Proceddings of the 4th European Conference on Games-Based Learning: ECGBL 2009.

Sofyan, R., Menik, K. S. (2018). The Impact of Visual, Auditory, and Kinesthetic Learning Styles on Economics Education Teaching. 1st International Conference on Economics Education, Economics, Business and Management, Accounting and Enterpreneurship (PICEEBA 2018), Vol. 57, pp.642-649.

Widiyanti, Teti. (2011). Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Pendidikan Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. (Online). Tersedia: http://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/bitstream/123456789/5755/1/TETI%20WIDIYANTI-FITK

Yulianti, Resdina Putri. (2017). Profil Pemecahan Masalah Aritmatika Sosial Siswa Kelas VIIA SMPN 2 Jember Berdasarkan Tahapan Polya Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar V-A-K (Visual, Auditorial, Kinestetik). (Skripsi tidak diterbitkan: Universitas Jember).

Zahroh, Umy dan Beni, Asyhar. (2014). Kecenderungan Gaya Belajar Mahasiswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Fungsi Bijektif. Jurnal Kebijakan dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Vol.2, No.1, Januari 2014 (72-81), ISSN: 2337-7623, EISSN: 2337-7615.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29103/mjml.v2i2.1385

Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 1350 times
 PDF Downloaded : 407 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Dwi Noviani Sulisawati, Lutfiyah, Frida Murtinasari, Luzainiatus Sukma

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

CURRENT INDEXING :

Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML) are abstracting & indexing in the following databases:

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTEScUl3v2Etgwe2TfFrBLazt810llmwl9VyyFd2lwnNa88qoHn

Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML) also has been listed and archives in the following databases: SHERPA/RoMEO Policy, LOCKSS Archieving System, ULRICHSWEB Proquest, EZB Universitat Reqensburq, Open Science Directory by EBSCO information service and ROAD ISSN.